Response of plant species to coal-mine soil materials
- 21 Downloads
A two-year experiment was conducted on the Black Mesa Coal Mine near Kayenta, Arizona to investigate the growth and establishment of seven plant species in unmined soil (undisturbed soil) and coal-mine soil (spoils). Natural rainfall (20 cm/yr) and natural rainfull plus sprinkler irrigation (50 cm/yr) were the irrigation treatments applied to each soil material.
Plant species grew better in unmined soil than in coal-mine soil. Supplemental irrigation water resulted in more plant growth than did natural rainfall alone in both soil materials; however, there were highly significant differences among species. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and all of the annual perennial grasses used, excluding Indian ricegrass (Oryzopsis hymenoides Ricker), produced effective ground cover on both soil materials when they received supplemental irrigation water. Fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens Pursh.) had low germination (emergence), seedling establishment, and stem production during the first year of growth; however, in the second year of growth, this species produced a dense ground cover on coal-mine soil with natural rainfall plus irrigation. In revegetating the Black Mesa Coal Mine, Harlan II barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and Super X wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) provided initial protective cover until adapted perennial species could be established for permanent stabilisation.
The Black Mesa Research Study indicated that irrigation water during seedling establishment was essential for the effective stabilisation of coal-mine soils in a semiarid environment.
KeywordsPerennial Grass Ground Cover Seedling Establishment Soil Material Irrigation Treatment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Aldon, E. F., ‘Reclamation of coal-mined land in the Southwest’,Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 33(2), 75–9 (1978).Google Scholar
- 2.Argall, G. O. (Editor), ‘Management of disturbed mining lands: how it's done in Arizona’,World Mining, 28(5), 50–53 (1975).Google Scholar
- 3.Day, A. D., Mitchell, G. F., Tucker, T. C., and Thames, J. L., ‘Emergence and growth of plant species in coal mine soil’,Journal of Environmental Quality, 8(1), 110–14(1979).Google Scholar
- 4.Day, A. D., and Ludeke, K. L., ‘New barley plants grow faster and stabilize copper tailings better’,World Mining. 31(11), 41–3(1978).Google Scholar
- 5.Jaynes, R. A., and Harper, K. T., ‘Patterns of natural vegetation in the arid southeastern Utah’,Journal of Range Management, 31(6), 407–11 (1978).Google Scholar
- 6.Jones, J. N., Armiger, W. G. and Bennett, O. L., ‘A two-step system for revegetation of surface mine spoils’,Journal of Environmental Quality, 4(2), 233–5 (1975).Google Scholar
- 7.LeRoy, J. C., and Keller, H., ‘How to reclaim mined areas, tailing ponds and dumps into valuable land’,World Mining, 8(1), 34–41 (1972).Google Scholar
- 8.Packer, P. E., and Aldon, E. F., ‘Revegetation techniques for dry regions’, in Schaller, F. W., and Sutton, P. (Editors),Reclamation of Drastically Disturbed Lands, Chapter 24, pp 425–50, American Society of Agronomy Inc., Crop Science of America Inc. and Soil Science Society of America Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA (1978).Google Scholar
- 9.Plass, W. T., ‘Reclamation of coal-mined land in Appalachia’,Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 33(2), 56–61 (1978).Google Scholar
- 10.Power, J. F., Ries, R. E., and Sandoval, F. M., ‘Reclamation of coal-mined land in the northern Great Plains’,ibid., 33(3), 69–74 (1978).Google Scholar
- 11.Ries, R. E., and Day, A. D., ‘Use of irrigation in reclamation in dry regions’, in Schalter and Sutton,op. cit., Chapter 24, pp 505–20.Google Scholar
- 12.Steel, R. G. D., and Torrie, J. H.,Principles and Procedures of Statistics, 481 pp, McGraw-Hill (1960).Google Scholar