Skip to main content
Log in

A prospective study of effects of belsey MK IV antireflux surgery on endoscopic esophagitis, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and 24-Hr pH measurements

Relation to symptom improvement

  • Originals Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A prospective study on the effect of the Belsey MK IV operation on esophagitis, lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP), and acid reflux as monitored on 24-hr pH recording was conducted to investigate the association between objective changes and the effect of operation on reflux-associated symptoms. Thirty-one patients were included. The effect of surgery on symptoms was recorded in all patients, and 22 patients agreed to undergo endoscopy, manometry, and 24-hr pH recording. Follow-up ranged from three to nine years (mean five years); 87% reported long-lasting improvement (50% free of symptoms, 37% major improvement, no medication needed). The combination of symptomatic improvement and absence of esophagitis was found in 70%. LESP significantly increased [8±6 mm Hg preoperatively, 14±5 mm Hg postoperatively (P<0.001)] to a level above 5 mm Hg in 96% of the patients. No endoscopic esophagitis was found in 17 of 20 patients (85%;P<0.05) (two patients refused endoscopy). The 24-hr pH monitoring normalized in 11 of the 20 patients (55%) (one registration failed). The operation-induced rise in LESP correlated with improvement on endoscopy (r=0.51;P<0.002) and with reduction of reflux parameters (number of episodes with pH<4:r=0.64;P<0.05, percentage of total time pH<4:r=0.42;P=0.07). A rise in LESP must be an important aim of antireflux surgery. The Belsey MK IV does not induce a rise to a level that causes severe dysphagia or bloating, but the trade-off is less control of acid reflux. The Belsey MK IV provides long-lasting symptomatic improvement in 87% of patients. Normalization of the 24-hr pH profile is an essential marker for successful surgery, and we propose to score the results of antireflux surgery by a combination of clinical symptoms and endoscopic findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holt S, Howden CW: Omeprazole. Overview and opinion. Dig Dis Sci 36:385–393, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maton PN: Drug therapy: Omeprazole. N Engl J Med 324:965–975, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sandmark S, Carlsson R, Fausa O, Lundell L: Omeprazole or ranitidine in the treatment of reflux esophagitis. Results of a double-blind, randomized, Scandinavian multicenter study. Scand J Gastroenterol 23:625–632, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  4. Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Jansen JBMJ, Festen HPM, Meuwissen SGM, Lamers CBHW: Double blind multicenter comparison of omeprazole and ranitidine in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis. Lancet 1:349–351, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dehn TCB, Shepherd HA, Colin-Jones D, Kettlewell MGW, Carroll NJ: Double-blind comparison of omeprazole (40 mg od) versus cimetidine (400 mg qd) in the treatment of symptomatic erosive reflux oesphagitis. Gut 31:509–513, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  6. Richter JE: Surgery for reflux disease-reflections of a gastroenterologist. N Engl J Med 326:825–827, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jansen JBMJ, Lamers CBHW: High doses of ranitidine in patients with reflux oesophagitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 25(suppl):42–46, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  8. Belsey RHR: Transthoracic partial fundoplication (Belsey repair).In GG Jamieson (ed). Surgery of the Oesophagus. London, Churchill Livingstone, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  9. Arndorfer RC, Steff JJ, Dodds WJ, Linehan JH, Hogan WJ: Improved infusion system for intraluminal esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology 73:23–27, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  10. Savary M, Miller G: The Esophagus, Handbook and Atlas of Endoscopy. Slothum Schweitz, Verlag Gassmann AG, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  11. Masclee AAM, De Best ACAM, De Graaf R, Cluysenaer OJJ, Jansen JBMJ: Ambulatory 24 hr pH-metry in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Determination of criteria and relation to endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 25:225–230, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson LF, DeMeester TR: 24 hr pH monitoring in the distal esophagus: A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 62:325–332, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  13. Glantz SA: Primer of Biostatistics, 2nd ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor TV, Holt S: Antireflux surgery. A time for reappraisal. Br Med J 300:1603–1604, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  15. Spechler SJ: Comparison of medical and surgical therapy for complicated gastroesophageal reflux disease in veterans. N Engl J Med 326:787–792, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  16. DeMeester TR, Bonavina L, Albertucci M: Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 204:9–20, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guamer V, Martinez N, Gavino JF: Ten years evaluation of posterior fundoplasty in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Am J Surg 139:200–203, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  18. Siewert JR, Feussner H, Walker SJ: Fundoplication: How to do it? Periesophageal wrapping as a therapeutic principal in gastroesophageal reflux prevention. World J Surg 16:326–334, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stein HJ, DeMeester PR: Who benefits from antireflux surgery? World J Surg 16:313–319, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  20. DeMeester TR, Wernly JA, Bryant GH: Clinical andin-vitro analysis of gastroesophageal competence: A study of the principles of antireflux surgery. Am J Surg 137:39–45, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stein HJ, Bremner RM, Jamieson J, DeMeester TR: Effect of Nissen fundoplication on esophageal function. Am J Surg 161:709–713, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stein HJ, Barlow AP, DeMeester TR, Hinder RA: Complications of gastroesophageal reflux: Role of the lower esophageal sphincter, esophageal acid and acid/alkaline exposure and duodenogastric reflux. Ann Surg 216:35–43, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stein HJ, DeMeester TR, Naspetti R, Jamieson J, Perry RE: Three-dimensional imaging of the lower esophageal sphincter in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 374–384, 1991

  24. Dent J, Dodds WJ, Friedman RH: Mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux in recurrent asymptomatic patients. J Clin Invest 65:256–267, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dodds WJ, Dent J, Hogan WJ, Arndorfer RC: Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with reflux esophagitis. N Engl J Med 310:284–288, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jamieson GG: Anti-reflux operations: How do they work? Br J Surg 74:155–156, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ott DJ, Katz PO, Wu WC: Anti-reflux barrier.In DO Castell et al (eds). Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Mt. Kisco, New York, Futura, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zaninotto G, DeMeester TR, Schwizer W, Johansson KE, Cheng S: The lower esophageal sphincter in health and disease. Am J Surg 155:104–111, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rosen SN, Pope CE II: Extended esophageal pH monitoring. J Clin Gastroenterol 11:260–270, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bennett JR: pH-measurement in the oesophagus. Balliere's Clin Gastroenterol 1:747–767, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  31. Breumelhof R, Smout AJPM, Schijns MWRJ, Bronzwaer PWA, Akkermans LMA, Jansen A: Prospective evaluation of the effects of Nissen fundoplication on gastroesophageal reflux. Surg Gynecol Obstet 171:115–119, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  32. Negre JB: Postfundoplications symptoms. Ann Surg 146:635–637, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shirazi SS, Schulze K, Soper RT: Long-term follow-up for treatment of complication of chronic reflux esophagitis. Arch Surg 122:548–552, 1987

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horbach, J.M.L.M., Cnossen, M.H., Jansen, J.B.M.J. et al. A prospective study of effects of belsey MK IV antireflux surgery on endoscopic esophagitis, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and 24-Hr pH measurements. Digest Dis Sci 39, 385–392 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02090213

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02090213

Key words

Navigation