Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to point out some progresses which were made in the field of Multicriteria Decision-Aid. These progresses concern individual preference modelling, preference aggregation, mathematical programming and theoretical aspects of MCDA.
Sommario
Questo articolo si propone di evidenziare alcuni dei più significativi progressi scientifici effettuati nel campo dell'aiuto multicriteriale alle decisioni (Multicriteria Decision Aid: MCDA). In particolare vengono considerati recenti sviluppi relativi alla modellizzazione delle preferenze individuali, all'aggregazione delle preferenze, alla programmazione matematica e ad altri aspetti teorici nell'ambito dell'MCDA.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ABBAS M., VINCKE Ph.,Preference Structure and Threshold Models, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 2, 1993, pp. 171–178.
BOUYSSOU D., PERNY P.,Ranking methods for valued preference relations: a characterization of a method based on leaving and entering flows, European Journal of Operations Research, 61, 1992, pp. 186–194.
BOUYSSOU D.,Ranking methods based on valued preference relations: a characterization of the net flow method, European Journal of Operations Research, 60, 1992, pp. 61–68.
DOIGNON J. P., MONJARDET B., ROUBENS M., VINCKE Ph.,Biorder families, valued relations and preference modelling, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 30 (4), 1986, pp. 435–480.
FISHBURN P. C.,Utility theory for decision-marking, Wiley, New York, 1970a.
FISHBURN P. C.,Utility theory with inexact preferences and degrees of preference, Synthese, 21, pp. 204–222.
FISHBURN P. C.,Binary choice probabilities: on the varieties of stochastic transitivity, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 10, pp. 327–352.
KEENEY R., RAIFFA H.,Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs, J. Wiley and Sons, 1976.
LUCE D.,Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination, Econometrica, 24, pp. 178–191.
OVCKINNIKOV S., ROUBENS M.,On fuzzy strict preference, indifference and incomparability relations, Fuzzy sets and systems, 47, 1992, pp. 313–318.
PIRLOT M.,Ranking procedures for valued preference relations: a characterization of the ‘MIN’ procedure, Cahiers du CERO, 34, pp. 233–241.
POINCARÉ H.,La valeur de la science, Flammarion, 1935.
ROUBENS M., VINCKE Ph.,Preference Modelling, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Sciences, 250, Springer Verlag, 1985, p. 100.
ROY B.,Critères multiples et modélisation des préférences: l'apport des relations de surclassement, Revue d'Economie Politique, 1, 1974.
ROY B., VINCKE Ph.,Relational systems of preference with one or more pseudo-criteria: some new concepts and results, Management Science, 30 (11), 1984, pp. 1323–1335.
ROY B., VINCKE Ph.,Pseudo-orders: definition, properties and numerical representation, Mathematical Social Sciences, 14 (2), 1987, pp. 263–274.
Roy B., BOUYSSOU D.,Aide Multicritère à la décision: Méthodes et Cas, Eds Economica, 1993.
STEUER R.,Multiple criteria optimization: theory, computation and application, Wiley, New York, 1986.
TSOUKIAS A., VINCKE Ph.,A survey on non conventional Preference Modeling, Ricerca Operativa, 61, 1992, pp. 5–48.
VINCKE Ph.,Vrais, quasi, pseudo et précritères dans un ensemble fini: propriétés et algorithmes, Cahier du Lamsade, 27, Université Paris-Dauphine, 1980.
VINCKE Ph.,(P.Q.I.)-preference structures, in Non-conventional preference relations in decision making, J. Kacprzyk and M. Roubens (eds), Springer-Verlag, 301, 1988, pp. 72–81.
VINCKE Ph.,Multicriteria Decision-aid, Wiley, 1992, p. 154.
VINCKE Ph.,Exploitation of a crisp relation in a ranking problem, Theory and Decision, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 32, 1992, pp. 221–249.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vincke, P. Recent progresses in Multicriteria Decision-Aid. Rivista di Matematica per le Scienze Economiche e Sociali 17, 21–32 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088976
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088976