Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 243–254 | Cite as

Self-recognition of the body and its parts during late adolescence

  • John K. Collins
Article

Abstract

Male and female student volunteers were photographed nude in three orientations: front, side, and rear. One month later, they were asked to identify their bodies or bodily parts from an array of seven photographs grouped according to height and linearity. Thirty judgments of the full body, multiple parts, and single parts were made, including the head, thorax, abdomen, arms and legs, as well as the torso and top and bottom halves of the body. Females took significantly longer to identify themselves than did males and frontal identifications were carried out quicker than rear identifications, which in turn were judged quicker than side orientations. The breasts were found to be the most important secondary sexual characteristic for females, and bodily hair for males. The genitals were judged quickly and accurately by males. The results are discussed in terms of ego involvement, narcissism, and the increased attention given to the body during adolescence.

Keywords

Health Psychology Bodily Part School Psychology Female Student Late Adolescence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnhoff, F. N., and Damianopoulos, E. N. (1962). Self-body recognition: An empirical approach to body image.Merrill-Palmer Quart. 8: 143–148.Google Scholar
  2. Ausubel, D. P., Montemayor, R., and Svajian, P. (1977).Theory and problems of Adolescent Development, Grune and Stratton, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, D. (1960). The body concept.J. Ment. Sci. 106: 56–75.Google Scholar
  4. Cole, L., and Hall, I. N. (1970).The Psychology of Adolescence, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Collins, J. K., Harper, J. F., and Cassel, A. J. (1976). Self-body recognition in late adolescence.Austral. Psychologist 11: 153–157.Google Scholar
  6. Douvan, E., and Adelson, J. (1966).The Adolescent Experience, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Gellert, E., Girgus, J., and Cohen, J. (1971). Children's awareness of their bodily appearance: A developmental study of factors associated with the body percept.Genet. Psychol. Monogr. 84: 109–174.Google Scholar
  8. Grinder, R. E. (1973).Adolescence, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Horrocks, J. E. (1976).The Psychology of Adolescence, Houghton Mifflin Boston.Google Scholar
  10. Hurlock, E. (1973).Adolescent Development, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Jersild, A. (1978).The Psychology of Adolescence, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Laganza, S. (1978). Self-recognition of the human face in adolescence and adulthood: A study of narcissism. B. A. honours thesis. School of Behavioural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  13. Lerner, R. M. (1969a). Some female stereotypes of male body build behavior-relations.Percept. Mot. Skills 28: 363–366.Google Scholar
  14. Lerner, R. M. (1969b). The development of stereotyped expectancies of body build-behavior relations.Child Devel. 40: 137–141.Google Scholar
  15. Lerner, R. M., and Spanier, G. B. (1980).Adolescent Development: A Life-Span Perspective, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Maslow, A. H., and Sakoda, J. M. (1952). Volunteer-error in the Kinsey study.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 47: 259–262.Google Scholar
  17. McCandless, B. R. (1970).Adolescents: Behavior and Development, Dryden Press, Hinsdale, Ill.Google Scholar
  18. Parnell, R. W. (1964). Simplified somatotypes.J. Psychosomat. Res. 8: 311–315.Google Scholar
  19. Rogers, D. (1962).The Psychology of Adolescence, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Schilder, P. (1931).Brain and Personality, Nervous and Mental Diseases Publishing Company, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Schilder, P. (1935)The Image and Appearance of the Human Body, Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  22. Schonfeld, W. A. (1950). Inadequate masculine physique as a factor in personality development of adolescent boys.Psychosomat. Med. 12: 49–54.Google Scholar
  23. Sheldon, W. H., Dupertius, C. W., and McDermott, E. (1954).Atlas of Men, Harper, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Shulman, L. S. (1970). Reconstruction of educational research.Rev. Educ. Res. 40: 371–396.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, A. (1974).The Body, Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middlesex.Google Scholar
  26. Stolz, H. R., and Stolz, L. M. (1944). Adolescent problems related to somatic variations. In Henry, N. B. (ed.),Forty-Third Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  27. Thornburg, H. D. (1975).Development in Adolescence, Brooks/Cole, Monterey, Calif.Google Scholar
  28. Wapner, S., Werner, H., and Chandler, K. A. (1951). Experiments in sensory-tonic field theory of perception: 1. Effects of extraneous stimulation of the visual perception of verticality.J. Exper. Psychol. 42: 341–345.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • John K. Collins
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Behavioural SciencesMacquarie UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations