Abstract
University students are expected to defer to the authority of the formal rules of a university and to any symbols of that authority. A student engaging in open confrontation of the authority structure is violating the norms of the student role. While there are many measures of student support for protest, existing measures are inappropriate as generalized measures of deviance in the student role. This research develops two measures: Attitudinal Support for Confrontation (ASC) and Behavioral Support for Confrontation (BSC). Results of tests of reliability, convergent validity, and theoretical relevance show that (1) responses are internally consistent; (2) both measures tap a confrontation continuum; (3) descriptive characteristics of ASC supporters are comparable to other attitudinal protest measures; and (4) there are differences between behavioral and attitudinal support patterns.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altbach, P. G. (1979). Whatever happened to student activists?Chron. Higher Educ. 18: 56.
Altbach, P. G., and Peterson, P. M. (1972). Before Berkeley: Historical perspectives on American student activism. In Altbach, P. G., and Laufer, R. S., (eds.),The New Pilgrims: Youth Protest in Transition McKay, New York, pp. 3–31.
Bisconti, A. S., and Astin, A. W. (1971).Protest Behavior and Response on the U.S. Campus American Council on Education, Washington, D.C.
Braungart, R. G. (1966). SDS and YAF: Backgrounds of student political activists. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Miami, Fla.
Braungart, R. G. (1971). Family status, socialization and student politics, a multivariate analysis.Am. J. Sociol. 77: 108–130.
Braungart, R. G. (1976). College and noncollege youth politics in 1972: An application of Mannheim's generation unit model.J. Youth Adoles. 5: 325–347.
Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle.Psychol. Iss. 1: 1–171.
Erikson, E. H. (1968).Identity, Youth and Crisis Norton, New York.
Finney, H. C. (1971). Political libertarianism at Berkeley: An application of perspectives from the new left.J. Soc. Iss. 27: 35–62.
Flacks, R. (1967). The liberated generation: An exploration of the roots of student protest.J. Soc. Iss. 23: 52–75.
Hess, R. O., and Torney, J. V. (1967).The Development of Political Attitudes in Children, Aldine, Chicago.
Hodgkinson, H. (1970), Student protest — an institutional and national profile.The Record 71(May): 537–555.
Hope, D. R. (1976). Changes in college students' value patterns in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s.Soc. Educ. 49: 155–163.
Keniston, K. (1968).Young Radicals Harcourt, Brace and World, New York.
Keniston, K. (1971).Youth and Dissent Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
Kerpelman, L. C. (1969). Student political activism and ideology: Comparative characteristics of activists and nonactivists.J. Counsel. Psychol. 16: 8–13.
Kornberg, A., and Brehm, M. L. (1971). Ideology, institutional identification and campus activism.Soc. Forces 49: 445–460.
Levin, M. (1970). Social climates and political socialization. In Sigel, R. S., (ed.),Learning About Politics Random House, New York, pp. 353–362.
Lubell, S. (1968). That “generation gap.”Pub. Interest 13: 52–60.
Meehl, O. (1977). Law and the fire side inductions: Some reflections of a clinical psychologist. In Tapp, J. L., and Levine, F. J. (eds.),Law, Justice, and the Individual in Society Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 10–28.
Middleton, R., and Putney, S. (1963). Student rebellion against parental beliefs.Soc. Forces 41: 377–383.
Newcomb, T. (1943).Personality and Social Change: Attitude Formation in a Student Community Dryden, New York.
Olsen, M. (1970). Social and political participation of blacks.Am. Sociol. Rev. 35: 682–697.
Orum, A., and Cohen, R. S. (1973). The development of political orientations among black and white children.Am. Sociol. Rev. 38: 62–74.
Parsons, T., and Platt, G. M. (1972). Higher education and changing socialization. In Riley, M. W., Johnson, M., and Forer, A. (eds.),Aging and Society Sage, New York, pp. 236–291.
Somers, R. H. (1965). The mainsprings of rebellion: A survey of Berkeley students in November 1964. In Lipset, S. M., and Wolin, S. S. (eds.),The Berkeley Student Revolt Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y., pp. 530–558.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1963).Methodology and Scores of Socioeconomic Status. Working Paper No. 15, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C.
Westby, D. L., and Braungart, R. G. (1966). Class and politics in the family backgrounds of student political activists.Am. Sociol. Rev. 31: 690–692.
Wood, J. L. (1974).The Sources of American Student Activism D.C. Health, Lexington, Mass.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herrman, M.S. Developing a measure of student deviance: A research note. J Youth Adolescence 9, 229–238 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088467
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088467