Skip to main content
Log in

Loperamide improves anal sphincter function and continence after restorative proctocolectomy

  • Motitity, Nerve-Gut Interactions, Hormones, And Receptors
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The physiological and clinical effects of loperamide treatment versus placebo were investigated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study in patients operated with restorative proctocolectomy. Sixteen patients operated with endoanal mucosectomy and a handsewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and 14 patients operated with abdominal proctocolectomy and stapling of the pouch to the top of the anal canal were studied. While loperamide treatment increased resting anal pressure in both groups of patients by approximately 20% (P<0.05), squeeze pressure was not affected. Loperamide did not affect pouch volume or contractility. Sensory thresholds and the recto/pouch-anal inhibitory reflex were not influenced by loperamide treatment. Clinical function was improved, with a reduced bowel frequency and an improved nighttime continence, with less soiling (P<0.05) as well as need to wear a protective pad.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wexner SD, Jensen L, Rothenberger DA, Wong WD, Goldberg SM: Long-term functional analysis of the ileoanal reservoir. Dis Colon Rectum 32:275–281, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pemberton JH, Phillips SF, Ready RR, Zinsmeister AR, Bears OH: Quality of life after Brooke ileostomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 209:620–628, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Öresland T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Hultén L: The clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective study in 100 patients. Int J Colorect Dis 4:50–56, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schiller LR, Santa Ana CA, Morawski SG, Fordtran JS: Mechanism of the antidiarrheal effect of loperamide. Gastroenterology 86:1475–1480, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Theodorou V, Fioramonti J, Hachet T, Bueno L: Absorptive and motor components of the antidiarrhoeal action of loperamide: Anin vivo study in pigs. Gut 32:1355–1399, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De Luca A, Coupar IM: Difenoxin and loperamide: Possible mechanisms of intestinal antisecretory action. Arch Pharmacol 347:231–237, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  7. Read M, Read NW, Barber DC, Duthie HL: Effects of loperamide on anal sphincter function in patients complaining of chronic diarrhea with fecal incontinence and urgency. Dig Dis Sci 27:807–814, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Göke A, Ewe K, Donner K, Meyer zum Büschenfelde KH: Influence of loperamide and loperamide oxide on the anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 35:857–861, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rattan S, Culver PJ: Influence of loperamide on the internal anal sphincter in the opossum. Gastroenterology 93:121–128, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hallgren T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Öresland T, Hultén L: The stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A randomized study comparing two different pouch designs. Scand J Gastroenterol 25:1161–1168, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Åkervall S, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Öresland T, Hultén L: Manovolumetry: A new method for investigation of anorectal function. Gut 29:614–623, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Öresland T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Åkervall S, Hultén L: Manovolumetric and sensory characteristics of the ileoanal J-pouch compared with healthy rectum. Br J Surg 77:803–806, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Öresland T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Hallgren T, Hultén L: A prospective randomized comparison of two different pouch designs. Scand J Gastroenterol 25:986–996, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ooms LAA, Degryse AD, Janssen PAJ: Mechanisms of action of loperamide. Scand J Gastroenterol 19:145–155, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hughes S, Higgs NB, Turnberg LA: Loperamide has antisecretory activityin vivo in human jejunum. Gut 24:A495, 1983

  16. Kachel GW, Ruppin H, Hagel J, Barina W, Meinhard M, Domschke W: Effect of loperamide on jejunal fluid transport and propulsion in man. Gastroenterol 84:1200, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reynolds IJ, Gould RJ, Snyder SH: Loperamide: Blockade of calcium channels as a mechanism for antidiarrheal effects. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 231:628–632, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Burleigh DE, D'Mello A: Neural and pharmacological factors affecting motility of the internal anal sphincter. Gastroenterology 84:409–417, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McKirdy HC: Effect of loperamide on human isolated internal anal sphincter. J Physiol 316:18, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  20. Emblem R, Stien R, Mörkrid L: The effect of loperamide on bowel habits and anal sphincter function in patients with ileoanal anastomosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 24:1019–1024, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yagasaki O, Suzuki H, Sohji Y: Effects of loperamide on acetylcholine and prostaglandin release from isolated guinea pig ileum. Jpn J Pharmacol 28:873–882, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Musial F, Enck P, Kalveram K-T, Erckenbrecht JF: The effect of loperamide on anorectal function in normal healthy men. J Clin Gastroenterol 15:321–324, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Orkin BA, Soper NJ, Kelly KA, Dent J: Influence of sleep on anal sphincteric pressure in health and after ileal pouchanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 35:137–144, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Duthie GS, Bartolo DCC: Nocturnal leakage is related to high pressure waves following restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 77:A699-A700, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hallgren T, Fasth S, Delbro D, Nordgren S, Öresland T, Hultén L: The effects of atropine or benzilonium on pelvic pouch and anal sphincter function. Scand J Gastroenterol 26:563–571, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kramer P: Effect of antidiarrheal and antimotility drugs on ileal excreta. Am J Dig Dis 22:327–332, 1977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Körner MM: Differential effects of loperamide on gut motility. Gastroenterology 82:1255, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  28. O'Connell PR, Pemberton JH, Brown ML, Kelly KA: Determinants of stool frequency after ileal pouch-anal anstomosis. Am J Surg 153:157–164, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This investigation was supported by grants from the Swedish Medical Research Council (17X-03117), the University of Göteborg, Göteborgs Läkarsällskap, Assar Gabrielssons Fond, AB Skandias 100-årsfond and Ingabritt och Arne Lundbergs Forskningsfond.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hallgren, T., Fasth, S., Delbro, D.S. et al. Loperamide improves anal sphincter function and continence after restorative proctocolectomy. Digest Dis Sci 39, 2612–2618 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02087698

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02087698

Key words

Navigation