Abstract
We assessed the relationship of lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) to presence and absence of lower esophageal mucosal ring (LEMR) in 66 patients to determine if the LEMR was more likely related to prolonged sphincter hypotension. This potential relationship is of interest because LEMR may be due to reflux esophagitis. Each patient had radiographic and manometric studies, and both examinations were done within one week of each other. The mean LESP in patients with LEMR was 23.8 mm Hg (range 4.2–64 mm Hg) compared to 28.7 mm Hg (range 8–59 mm Hg) in patients without LEMR; the difference was not statistically significant. Patients with LEMR were also divided into three subgroups according to the diameter of the rings (≤13 mm, 14–19 mm, ≥20 mm). There was no significant relationship between the caliber of LEMR and LESP (P>0.05). Presence of LEMR did not affect the amplitude or duration of primary esophageal peristalsis. These results do not support a relationship between LEMR and prolonged LESP hypotension or abnormal esophageal motility. However, other pathogenetic mechanisms involved in producing reflux esophagitis not related to prolonged sphincter hypotension were not studied.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ott DJ, Gelfand DW, Wu WC, Castell DO: Esophagogastric region and its rings. AJR 142:281–287, 1984
Ott DJ, Katz PO, Wu WC: Anti-reflux barrier.In Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Therapy. DO Castell, WC Wu, DJ Ott (eds). Mount Kisco, New York, Futura Publishing Company, 1985, pp 35–54
Ott DJ, Wu WC, Gelfand DW: Reflux esophagitis revisited: Prospective analysis of radiologic accuracy. Gastrointest Radiol 6:1–7, 1981
Johnson LF, DeMeester TR, Haggitt RC: Endoscopic signs for gastroesophageal reflux objectively evaluated. Gastrointest Endosc 22:151–155, 1976
Cohen S, Harris LD: Does hiatus hernia affect competence of the gastroesophageal sphincter? N Engl J Med 284:1053–1056, 1971
Chen YM, Ott DJ, Gelfand DW, Munitz HA: Multiphasic examination of the esophagogastric region for strictures, rings and hiatal hernia: evaluation of the individual techniques. Gastrointest Radiol 10:311–316, 1985
Ott DJ, Richter JE, Chen YM, Wu WC, Gelfand DW, Castell DO: Esophageal radiography and manometry: Correlation in 172 patients with dysphagia. AJR 149:307–311, 1987
Richter JE, Wu WC, Johns DN, Blackwell JN, Nelson JL, Castell JA, Castell DO: Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers. Variability of pressures with age and frequency of “abnormal” contractions. Dig Dis Sci 32:583–592, 1987
Ahtaridis G, Snape WJ Jr, Cohen S: Lower esophageal sphincter pressure as an index of gastroesophageal acid reflux. Dig Dis Sci 26:993–998, 1981
Wolf BS, Brahams SA, Khilnani MT: The incidence of hiatus hernia in routine barium meal examination. Mt Sinai J Med NY 26:598–600, 1959
Wright RA, Hurwitz AL: Relationship of hiatal hernia to endoscopically proved reflux esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci 24:311–313, 1979
Ott DJ, Gelfand DW, Chen YM, Wu WC, Munitz HA: Predictive relationship of hiatal hernia to reflux esophagitis. Gastrointest Radiol 10:317–320, 1985
Chen YM, Gelfand DW, Ott DJ, Munitz HA: Natural progression of the lower esophageal mucosal ring. Gastrointest Radiol 12:93–98, 1987
Jamieson J, Hinder RA, DeMeester TR, Litchfield D, Barlow A, Bailey RT Jr: Analysis of thirty-two patients with Schatzki's ring. Am J Surg 158:563–566, 1989
Eckardt VF, Adami B, Hücker H, Leeder H: The esophagogastric junction in patients with asymptomatic lower esophageal mucosal rings. Gastroenterology 79:426–430, 1980
Marshall JB, Kretschmar JM, Diaz-Arias AA: Gastroesophageal reflux as a pathogenic factor in the development of symptomatic lower esophageal rings. Arch Intern Med 150:1669–1672, 1990
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, M.Y.M., Ott, D.J., Donati, D.L. et al. Correlation of lower esophageal mucosal ring and lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Digest Dis Sci 39, 766–769 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02087421
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02087421