Skip to main content
Log in

Socio-economic impact management: programme design and implementation considerations

Minerals and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While larger mineral resource development projects offer new jobs and provide a stimulus to the economy of the area where they are sited, they may also pose problems in rural areas associated with rapid population growth. The purpose of an impact management programme is to anticipate and alleviate project effects that are generally perceived as undesirable and to enhance effects that are beneficial to site area communities. While the effective management of project effects is the end towards which all impact assessment efforts are directed, an integrated approach to impact management has been notably lacking. This paper suggests a systems framework for meeting this need by: (1) reviewing the need for impact management efforts; (2) discussing the objectives of, and considerations in, designing impact management programmes; (3) presenting a conceptual framework for, and key components of, such a programme; and (4) suggesting an approach for implementing such a system as an integral part of the project development process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Santini, D. L. South, D. W., and Stenehjem, E. J.,Evidence of Future Increases in the Impact of Conventional Electric Facilities on Rural Communities, ANL/EES-TM-152, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Warrack, A. A., and Dale, L.,Megaprojects and Small Communities — Is It Progress?, Paper presented at the Human Side of Energy Conference, Second International Forum, Edmonton, Alberta (August 1981).

  3. McKay, G. A.,The Economic Impact of North Sea Oil on Scotland. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Selvik, A.,Social and Economic Impacts of North Sea Petroleum in Norway — Experiences and Challenges, Paper prepared for the annual meetings of the Canadian Sociological and Anthropological Association, The Institute of Industrial Economics, Bergen, Norway (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brjscoe, Maphis, Murray, and Lamont, Inc.,Impact Assessment: Anaconda Copper Company. Stillwater County, Montana, Boulder, Colorado (1981).

  6. Gilmore, J. S., and Duff, M. K.,Boom Town Growth Management: A Case Study of Rock Springs — Green River, Wyoming, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Summers, G. F., Evans, S. D., Clemente, F., Beck, E. M., and Minkoff, J.,Industrial Invasion of Nomelropolitan America: A Quarter Century of Experience. Praeger Publishers, New York (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Albrecht, S., ‘Socio-cultural factors and energy resource development in rural areas in the West’,Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 7, pp 78–90 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Summers, G. F., and Selvik, A.,Energy Resource Communities, The Institute of Industrial Economics, Bergen, Norway (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Murdock, S. H., and Leistritz, F. L.,Energy Development in the Western United States: Impact on Rural Areas, Praeger Publishers, New York (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dixon, M.,What Happened to Fairbanks? The Effects of the Trans-Alaska Oil Pipeline on the Community of Fairbanks, Alaska, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gilmore, J. S., ‘Boom towns may hinder energy resource development’,Science, Vol. 191, pp 535–40 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Metz, W. C., ‘The energy industry's involvement in housing’ in Kwit, L. (Editor),Directions in Urban Energy Systems, Praeger Publishers, New York, (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Metz, W. C.,Construction Work Force Management: Worker Transportalion and Temporary Housing Techniques, Report prepared for Western Rural Development Center, Corvallis, Oregon (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Myhra, D.,Energy Plant Sites: Community Planning for Large Projects, Conway Publications, Atlanta (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peelle, E.,Mitigating Community Impacts of Energy Development: Some Examples for Coal and Nuclear Generating Plants in the United States, Paper presented at the 1979 Annual Meeting of the America Association for the Advancement of Science, Houston, Texas, (3 January 1979).

  17. Gilmore, J. S., Hammon, D., Moore, K., Johnson, J., and Coddington, D.,Socioeconomic Impacts of Power Plants, Report prepared for Electric Power Research Institute, Denver Research Institute, Denver (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leistritz, F. L., and Maiki, K. C.,Socioeconomic Effects of Large Scale Resource Development Projects in Rural Areas: The Case of McLean County, North Dakota, Ag Econ Rpt. No. 151, North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station, Fargo (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Metz, W. C., ‘The mitigation of socioeconomic impacts by electric utilities’,Public Utilities Fortnightly, Vol. 106(1), pp 34–42 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Parsons, T.,The Social System, The Free Press, New York (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Buckley, W.,Sociology and Modern Systems Theory, Prentice-Hall, (1967).

  22. Holmes and Narver, Inc.,Life Support Facility Planning and Evaluation Concept Study for Construction and Deployment Personnel, M-X Weapons System, US Army Corps of Engineers, San Francisco, California (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Metz, W. C.,Socioeconomic Impact Management in the Western Energy Industry. BNL-25545, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  24. O'Hare, M., Sanderson, D., and Bacow, L. S.Facility Siting and Public Opposition. Van Nostrand-Reinhold (1982).

  25. Halstead, J. M., Leistritz, F. L., Rice, D. G., Saxowsky, D. M., and Chase, R. A.,Mitigating Socioeconomic Impacts of Nuclear Waste Repository Siting, North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station, Fargo (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Luke, R. T., ‘Managing community acceptance of major industrial projects’,Coastal Zone Management Journal, Vol.7, pp 271–96 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Creighton, J. L.,Public Involvement Manual: Involving the Public in Water and Power Resource Decisions. Water and Power Resources Service, Denver, Colorado (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  28. DePape, D.,Government/Industry Agreements for Resource Development: Socioeconomic Considerations, Presentation to CIM Annual General Meeting, Quebec City, Quebec, (27 April 1982).

  29. Leistritz, F. L., and Chase, R. A., ‘Socioeconomic impact monitoring systems: a review and evaluation’,Journal of Environmental Management (in press), (1982).

  30. Leiztritz, F. L., and Murdock, S. H.,Socioeconomic Impact of Resource Development: Methods for Assessment, Westview Press, Boulder Colorado (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hobart, C.,Energy Resource Development: Impact on Indigenous Community, Paper presented at the Four Nations Energy Resource Communities Conference, Edmonton and Calgary, Alberta (June 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Aronson, C.,Energy Development in Rural Areas: Corporate Provision of Housing and Community Infrastructure, Battelle Human Affairs Research Center, Seattle (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Briscoe, Maphis, Murray, and Lamont, Inc.,Action Handbook: Managing Growth in the Small Community, Prepared for US Environmental Protection Agency, Boulder, Colorado (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Urban Systems Research and Engineering, Inc.,A Handbook for the States on the Use of Compensation and Incentives in the Siting of Hazardous Waste Management Facilities, Prepared for US Environmental Protection Agency, Urban Systems Research and Engineering Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leistritz, F.L., Halstead, J.M., Chase, R.A. et al. Socio-economic impact management: programme design and implementation considerations. Minerals and the Environment 4, 141–150 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02085975

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02085975

Keywords

Navigation