Netherland Journal of Aquatic Ecology

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 255–264 | Cite as

The sweet, the salt and the sour: Contrasts in the restoration of aquatic systems

  • Brian Moss


Aquatic System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ALLEN, J.R. and S.J. HAWKINS. 1993. Can biological filtration be used to improve water quality? In: K.N. White, E.G. Bellinger, A.J. Saul. M. Symer and K. Hendry, Eds., Urban waterside regeneration, problems and prospects. Ellis Horwood Press, UK, p. 377–385.Google Scholar
  2. ALLEN, J.R., S.J. HAWKINS, G.R. RUSSELL and K.N. WHITE, 1992. Eutrophication and urban renewal: problems and perspectives for the management of disused docks. Sci. Tot. Env., Suppl. 1992: 1283–1295.Google Scholar
  3. ALLEN, J.R., S.B. WILKINSON and S.J. HAWKINS, 1995. Redeveloped docks as artificial lagoons: The development of brackish-water communities and potential for conservation of lagoonal species. Aquat. Cons. mar. Freshwat. Ecos. 5: 299–309.Google Scholar
  4. BATTARBEE, R.W., T.E.H. ALLOTT, K. BULL, A.E.G. CHRISTIE, C. CURTIS, R.J. FLOWER, J. HALL, R. HARRIMAN, A. JENKINS, S. JUGGINS, A. KREISER, S.E. METCALFE, S.J. ORMEROD, and S.T. PATRICK. 1994. Critical loads of acid deposition for UK freshwaters. Environmental Change Research Centre Research Papers 11:1–139.Google Scholar
  5. BENNION, H., S. JUGGINS and N.J. ANDERSON, 1996. Predicting epilimnetic phosphorus concentrations using an improved diatom-based transfer function and its application to lake eutrophication management. Environ. Sci. and Technol. 30: 2004–2007.Google Scholar
  6. BIRKS, H.J.B., J.M. LINE, S. JUGGINS, A.C. STEVENSON and C.J.F. TER BRAAK, 1990. Diatoms and pH reconstruction, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 327: 263–278.Google Scholar
  7. HAINS, B.A. and A. HORTON, 1969. British Regional Geology. Central England 3rd Edition. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  8. HOLLAND, D.G. and J.P.C. HARDING, 1984. Mersey. In: B.A. Whitton, Ed., Ecology of European Rivers. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, p. 113–144.Google Scholar
  9. HOSPER, H., 1989. Biomanipulation, a new perspective for restoring shallow, eutrophic lakes in the Netherlands. Hydrobiol. Bull. 23: 11–19.Google Scholar
  10. HOSPER, S.H. and E. JAGTMAN, 1990. Biomanipulation additional to nutrient control for restoration of shallow lakes in the Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 523–534.Google Scholar
  11. HOSPER, H. and M.L. MEIJER, 1993. Biomanipulation, will it work for your lake? A simple test for the assessment of chances for clear water, following drastic fish-stock reduction in shallow, eutrophic lakes. Ecol. Engin. 2: 63–72.Google Scholar
  12. JEPPESEN, E., J.P. JENSEN, P. KRISTENSEN, M. SØNDERGAARD, E. MORTENSEN, O. SORTKJAER and K. OLRIK, 1990. Fish manipulation as a lake restoration tool in shallow, eutrophic, temperate lakes 2: threshold levels, long-term stability and conclusions. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 219–227.Google Scholar
  13. JEPPESEN, E.. P. KRISTENSEN, J.P. JENSEN, M. SØNDERGAARD, E. MORTENSEN and T. LAURIDSEN, 1991, Recovery resilience following a reduction in external phosphorus loading of shallow, eutrophic Danish lakes: duration, regulating factors and methods for overcoming resilience. Mem. Ist. ltal. Idrobiol. 48: 127–148.Google Scholar
  14. JEPPESEN, E., M. SØNDERGAARD, E. MORTENSEN, P. KRISTENSEN, B. RIEMANN, H.J. JENSEN, J.P. MÜLLER, O. SORTKJAER, J.P. JEN-SEN, K. CHRISTOFFERSEN, S. BOSSELMANN and E. DALL, 1990. Fish manipulation as a lake restoration tool in shallow, eutrophic temperate lakes 1: cross-analysis of three Danish case studies. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 205–218.Google Scholar
  15. JOHNES, P., B. MOSS and G. PHILLIPS, 1996. The determination of total nitrogen and total phosphorus concentrations in freshwaters from land use, stock headage and population data: testing of a model for use in conservation and water quality management. Freshwat. Biol. 36:451–473.Google Scholar
  16. KILINC, S., 1995. Limnological studies on the North West Midland meres, with special reference to Whitemere. Ph D. Thesis, University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
  17. McGOWAN, S., 1996. Ancient cyanophyte blooms. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
  18. McNEISH, A.S., R.T. LEAH, L. CONNOR and M.S. JOHNSON, 1994. Methyl-hexachlorocyclohexane in mussels(Mytilus edulis) from the Mersey estuary. Mar. Poll. Bull. 28: 254–258.Google Scholar
  19. MEIJER, M.L., A.J.P. RAAT and R.W. DOEF, 1989. Restoration by biomanipulation of the Dutch shallow, eutrophic Lake Bleiswijske Zoom: first results. Hydrobiol. Bull. 23: 49–57.Google Scholar
  20. MEIJER, M.L., M.W. DE HAAN, A.W. BREUKELAAR and H. BUITENVELD, 1990. Is reduction of the benthivorous fish an important cause of high transparency following biomanipulation in shallow lakes? Hydrobiologia 200/201, 303–315.Google Scholar
  21. MEIJER, M.L. and H. HOSPER, 1997. Effects of biomanipulation in the large and shallow Lake Wolderwijd, the Netherlands. Hydrobiologia (in press).Google Scholar
  22. MEIJER, M.L., E. JEPPESEN, E. VAN DONK, B. MOSS, M. SCHEFFER, E. LAMMENS, E. VAN NES, J.A. VAN BERKUM, G.J. DE JONG, B.A. FAAFENG, and J.P. JENSEN, 1994. Long term responses to fish-stock reduction in small shallow lakes: interpretation of five-year results of four biomanipulation cases in The Netherlands and Denmark. Hydrobiologia 275/276: 457–466.Google Scholar
  23. MEIJER M.L., E.H. VAN NES, E.H.R.R. LAMMENS, R.D. GULATI, M.P. GRIMM, J. BACKX, P. HOLLEBEEK, E.M. BLAAUW and A.W. BREUKELAAR, 1994. The consquences of a drastic fish stock reduction in the large and shallow Lake Wolderwijd, the Netherlands. Can we understand what happened? Hydrobiologia 275/276: 31–42.Google Scholar
  24. MOSS, B., 1989. Water pollution and the management of ecosystems: a case study of science and scientist. In: P.J. Grubb and R.H. Whittaker, Eds. Toward a More Exact Ecology. Thirtieth Symposium of the British Ecological Society. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, p. 401–422.Google Scholar
  25. MOSS, B., 1990. Engineering and biological approaches to the restoration from eutrophication of shallow lakes in which aquatic plant communities are important components. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 367–377.Google Scholar
  26. MOSS, B., 1992. The scope for biomanipulation in improving water quality. In D.W. Sutcliffe & J.G. Jones, Eds., Eutrophication: Research and applicationto water supply. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, p. 73–81.Google Scholar
  27. MOSS, B., S. McGOWAN and L. CARVALHO, 1994. Determination of phytoplankton crops by top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in a group of English lakes, the West Midland meres. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39: 1020–1029.Google Scholar
  28. MOSS, B., J. MADGWICK and G. PHILLIPS, 1996a. A guide to the restoration of nutrient-enriched shallow lakes. Broads authority and Environment Agency, Norwich.Google Scholar
  29. MOSS, B., J. STANSFIELD, K. IRVINE, M. PERROW and G. PHILLIPS, 1996b. Progressive restoration of a shallow lake — a twelve-year experiment in isolation, sediment removal and biomanipulation. J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 71–86.Google Scholar
  30. MOSS, B., M. BEKLIOGLU, L. CARVALHO, S. KILINC, S. McGOWAN and D. STEPHEN. 1997.Vertically-challenged limnology: contrasts between deep and shallow lakes. Hydrobiologia (in press).Google Scholar
  31. MOSS, C.E., 1913. The vegetation of the Peak District, Cambridge university press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  32. NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY, 1995. The Mersey estuary. A report on environmental quality. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  33. PHILLIPS, W., 1884. The breaking of the Shropshire meres. Trans. Shrops. Arch. nat. Hist. Soc. 7: 277–300.Google Scholar
  34. REYNOLDS, C.S., 1979. The limnology of the eutrophic meres of the Shropshire — Cheshire plain — a review. Field Stud. 5: 93–173.Google Scholar
  35. SCHEFFER, M., S.H. HOSPER, M.-L. MEIJER, B. MOSS and E. JEPPESEN, 1993. Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. Trends in Ecol. & Evol. 8: 275–279.Google Scholar
  36. SCHINDLER, D.W., 1977. The evolution of phosphorus limitation in lakes. Science 195: 897–898.Google Scholar
  37. SINKER, C.A., 1962. The North Shropshire Meres and Mosses; a background for ecologists. Field Stud. 1: 101–138.Google Scholar
  38. TEN BRINK, B.J.H., S.H. HOSPER, and F. COLIJN, 1991. A quantitative method for description and assessment of ecosystems: The AMOEBA approach, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 23:265–270.Google Scholar
  39. VAN DONK, E., E. DE DECKERE, G.P. KLEIN BRETELER and J.T. MEULEMANS, 1994. Herbivory by waterfowl and fish on macrophytes in a biomanipulated lake:effects on long term recovery. Verh. internat. Verein, theor. angew. Limnol. 25: 2139–2143.Google Scholar
  40. VAN DONK, E., M.P. GRIMM, R.D. GULATI, P.G.M. HEUTS, W.A. DE KLOET and L. VAN LIERE, 1990. First attempt to apply whole lake foodweb manipulation on a large scale in the Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 291–301.Google Scholar
  41. VAN DONK, E. and R.D. GULATI, 1995. Transition of a lake to turbid state six years after biomanipulation: mechanisms and pathways. Water Sci. & Technol. 32: 197–206.Google Scholar
  42. VAN DONK, E., R.D. GULATI and M.P. GRIMM, 1989. Food web manipulation in Lake Zwemlust:positive and negative effects during the first two years. Hydrobiol. Bull. 23: 19–34.Google Scholar
  43. VAN DONK, E., R.D. GULATI, A. IEDEMA, and J.T. MEULEMANS, 1993. Macrophyte-related shifts in the nitrogen and phosphorus contents of the different trophic levels in a biomanipulated shallow lake. Hydrobiologia 251: 19–26.Google Scholar
  44. WEBB, M., 1924. Precious Bane. Jonathan Cape, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian Moss
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesThe University of LiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations