Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 339–365 | Cite as

Unrelated machine scheduling with time-window and machine downtime constraints: An application to a naval battle-group problem

  • Youngho Lee
  • Hanif D. Sherali
Article

Abstract

This paper deals with an unrelated machine scheduling problem of minimizing the total weighted flow time, subject to time-window job availability and machine downtime side constraints. We present a zero-one integer programming formulation of this problem. The linear programming relaxation of this formulation affords a tight lower bound and often generates an integer optimal solution for the problem. By exploiting the special structures inherent in the formulation, we develop some classes of strong valid inequalities that can be used to tighten the initial formulation, as well as to provide cutting planes in the context of a branch-and-cut procedure. A major computational bottleneck is the solution of the underlying linear programming relaxation because of the extremely high degree of degeneracy inherent in the formulation. In order to overcome this difficulty, we employ a Lagrangian dual formulation to generate lower and upper bounds and to drive the branch-and-bound algorithm. As a practical instance of the unrelated machine scheduling problem, we describe a combinatorial naval defense problem. This problem seeks to schedule a set of illuminators (passive homing devices) in order to strike a given set of targets using surface-to-air missiles in a naval battle-group engagement scenario. We present computational results for this problem using suitable realistic data.

Keywords

Unrelated machine scheduling time-window constraints Lagrangian relaxation strong integer programming formulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    K.R. Baker,Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling (Wiley, New York, 1974).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    D.D. Boyer, E.L. Perry and E.L. Price, Force level control in naval anti-air warfare,Proc. Symp. on Command and Control Research, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA (June, 1990).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    P.M. Camerini, L. Fratta and F. Maffioli, On improving relaxation methods by modified gradient techniques, Math. Progr. Study 3(1975)26–34.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    T.J. Chan and C.A. Yano, A multiplier adjustment approach for the set partitioning problem, Oper. Res. 40(1992)S40-S47.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    M.L. Fisher, The Lagrangian relaxation method for solving integer programming problems, Manag. Sci. 27(1981)1–18.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    M.R. Garey and D.S. Johnson, Two-processor scheduling with start times and deadlines, SIAM J. Comp. 6(1977)416–426.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    M.R. Garey and D.S. Johnson,Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness (W.H. Freeman, New York, 1979).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    E.S. Gottlieb and M.R. Rao, The generalized assignment problem: valid inequalities and facets, Math. Progr. 46(1990)31–52.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    E.S. Gottlieb and M.R. Rao, (1,k)-configuration facets for the generalized assignment problem, Math. Progr. 46(1990)53–60.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Grabowski, E. Nowicki and S. Zdrzalka, A block approach for single machine schedule with release dates and due dates, Euro. J. Oper. Res. 26(1986)278–285.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    P.L. Hammer, E.L. Johnson and U.N. Peled, Facets of regular 0–1 polytopes, Math. Progr. 8(1975)179–206.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    M. Held, P. Wolfe and H.P. Crowder, Validation of subgradient optimization, Math. Progr. 6(1974)62–88.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Y. Lee, The polyhedral structure of some combinatorial optimization problems with applications to a naval defense problem, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic and State University (August, 1992).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    V.J. Leon and S.D. Wu, On scheduling with ready-times, due-dates, and vacations, Naval Res. Log. 39(1992)53–65.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    R.E. Marsten, An algorithm for large set partitioning problems, Manag. Sci. 20(1974)774–787.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    G.L. Nemhauser and L.A. Wolsey,Integer and Combinatorial Optimization (Wiley, New York, 1988).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    M. Padberg, On the facial structure of set packing polyhedra, Math. Progr. 5(1973)199–215.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    M. Padberg and G. Rinaldi, A branch-and-cut algorithm for the resolution of large-scale symmetric traveling salesman problems, SIAM Rev. 33(1991)60–100.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    C.N. Potts, Analysis of a heuristic for one machine sequencing with release dates and delivery times, Oper. Res. 28(1980)1436–1441.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    S.C. Sarin, S. Ahn and A.B. Bishop, An improved branching scheme for the branch and bound procedure of schedulingn jobs onm parallel machines to minimize total weighted flowtime, Int. J. Prod. Res. 26(1988)1183–1191.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    H.D. Sherali, Y. Lee and D.D. Boyer, Models and algorithms for scheduling passive homing device in battle-group anti-air warfare scenarios, Research Report, Department of Industrial and Systems engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, (Dec. 1991), to appear in Naval Res. Log.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    H.D. Sherali and O. Ulular, A primal-dual conjugate subgradient algorithm for specially structured linear and convex programming problems, Appl. Math. Optim. 20(1989)193–224.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    B. Simons, On scheduling with release times and deadlines, in:Proc. NATO Advanced Study and Research Institute on Theoretical Approach to Scheduling Problems, ed. M.A.H. Dempster et al. (Reidel, Hingham, 1981) pp. 75–88.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    B. Simons, Multiprocessor scheduling of unit-time jobs with arbitrary release times and deadlines, SIAM J. Comp. 12(1983)294–299.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    B. Simons and M.K. Warmuth, A fast algorithm for multiprocessor scheduling of unit-length jobs, SIAM J. Comp. 18(1989)690–710.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    J.P. Sousa and L.A. Wolsey, A time index formulation on non-preemptive single machine scheduling problem, Math. Progr. 54(1992)353–367.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    E. Zemel, Easily computable facets of the knapsack polytope, Math. Oper. Res. 14(1989)760–764.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© J.C. Baltzer AG, Science Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Youngho Lee
    • 1
  • Hanif D. Sherali
    • 2
  1. 1.US WEST Advanced TechnologiesBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Department of Industrial and Systems EngineeringVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations