Advertisement

Mathematical Geology

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 41–68 | Cite as

Inversion of dynamical indicators in quantitative basin analysis models. III. Multiwell information and two-dimensional case histories

  • Z. Yu
  • I. Lerche
  • Q. Bour
Article

Abstract

A dynamical tomography method, which inverts dynamical indicators to evaluate the parameters controlling geological processes as well as those in intrinsic equations of state, was introduced into a 2D fluid flow/compaction model termed GEOPETII (developed at the University of South Carolina), with the assumption of invariance to spatial location of parameters in equations of state, but allowing geologic process parameters to change with well location. Synthetic tests, including sensitivity analysis, are given to illustrate the operation of the system. The nonlinear inverse two-dimensional tomography method, together with a systematic linear search procedure, provides a useful approach to determine and constrain the parameters entering quantitative models of dynamical sedimentary evolution. Applying the method to an interpreted section from a seismic line in the Navarin Basin. Bering Sea. Alaska, the predictions of present-day formation thicknesses, porosity, and fluid pressure with depth are improved at four controlling well locations (Amoco Mishu No. 1, Exxon Redwood 1, Exxon Redwood 2, and Amoco Danielle), relative to previous results which used only a forward model. In this way the geohistory and structural development of the basin can be defined better, which helps in the reconstruction of thermal history, and so of hydrocarbon generation, migration, and accumulation histories in relation to structural and stratigraphic development.

Key words

inversion methods basin analysis modeling Navarin Basin (Alaska) tomographic parameters GEOPETII 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bour, O., and Lerche, I., 1994, Numerical modeling of abnormal fluid pressure in the Navarin Basin, Bering Sea: Marine & Petrol. Geology, v. 11, no. 4, p. 491–500.Google Scholar
  2. Hunt, J. M., 1979, Petroleum geochemistry and geology: W. H. Freeman and Co., San Fransico. 617 p.Google Scholar
  3. Lerche, I., 1990a, Basin analysis: quantitative methods. Vol. 1: Academic Press, Orlando, 562 p.Google Scholar
  4. Lerche, I., 1990b, Basin analysis: quantitative methods, Vol. 2: Academic Press, Orlando, 570 p.Google Scholar
  5. Lerche, I., 1991, Inversion of dynamical indicators in quantitative basin analysis models. I. The-oretical considerations: Math. Geology, v. 23, no. 6, p. 817–832.Google Scholar
  6. Nakayama, K., 1987, Two-dimensional basin analysis for petroleum exploration: unpubl. doctoral dissertation, Univ. South Carolina, 289 p.Google Scholar
  7. Rodgers, D. A., 1980, Analysis of pull-apart basin development produced by enechelon strike-slip faults,in Ballance, P. F., and Reading, H. G., eds., Sedimentation in oblique-slip mobil zones: Intern. Assoc. Sedimentologists Spec. Publ., v. 4. p. 27–41.Google Scholar
  8. Steffi, D. A., 1991, Abnormal formation pressure in the Navarin Basin, Bering Sea, Alaska: U.S. Mineral Management Service OCS Rept. MMS91-0034, 75 p.Google Scholar
  9. Turner, R. F., 1984, Geological and operational summary, Navarin Basin COST No. 1, Well, Bering Sea, Alaska: U.S. Mineral Management Service OCS Rept. MMS84-0031, 245 p.Google Scholar
  10. Worrall, D. M., 1991. Tectonic history of the Bering Sea and the evolution of Tertiary strike-slip basins of the Bering shelf: Geol. Soc. America, Spec. Paper 257, 120 p.Google Scholar
  11. Yu, Z., 1992, Quantitative basin modeling: an application in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge of Alaska, and salt influences on thermal anomalies and fracturing patterns of sediments in Gulf of Mexico: unpubl. doctoral dissertation, Univ. South Carolina, 161 p.Google Scholar
  12. Zhao, K., and Lerche, I., 1993, Inversion of dynamical indicators in quantiative basin analysis models. II. Synthetic tests and a case history using dynamical indicator tomography: Math. Geology, v. 25, no. 2, p. 107–123.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Z. Yu
  • I. Lerche
  • Q. Bour
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geological SciencesUniversity of South CarolinaColumbia

Personalised recommendations