Advertisement

Mathematical Geology

, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp 917–936 | Cite as

Prospector II: Towards a knowledge base for mineral deposits

  • Richard B. McCammon
Article

Abstract

What began in the mid-seventies as a research effort in designing an expert system to aid geologists in exploring for hidden mineral deposits has in the late eighties become a full-sized knowledge-based system to aid geologists in conducting regional mineral resource assessments. Prospector II, the successor to Prospector, is interactive-graphics oriented, flexible in its representation of mineral deposit models, and suited to regional mineral resource assessment. In Prospector II, the geologist enters the findings for an area, selects the deposit models or examples of mineral deposits for consideration, and the program compares the findings with the models or the examples selected, noting the similarities, differences, and missing information. The models or the examples selected are ranked according to scores that are based on the comparisons with the findings. Findings can be reassessed and the process repeated if necessary. The results provide the geologist with a rationale for identifying those mineral deposit types that the geology of an area permits. In future, Prospector II can assist in the creation of new models used in regional mineral resource assessment and in striving toward an ultimate classification of mineral deposits.

Key words

expert systems knowledge base mineral resource assessment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Campbell, A. N., Hollister, V. F., Duda, R. O., and Hart, P. E., 1982, Recognition of a Hidden Mineral Deposit by an Artificial Intelligence Program: Science, v. 217, p. 927–929.Google Scholar
  2. Cox, D. P., and Singer, D. A., eds., 1986, Mineral Deposit Models: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1693, 379 p.Google Scholar
  3. Duda, R. O., 1980, The Prospector System for Mineral Exploration: Final Report SRI Project 8172, Menlo, California, 120 p.Google Scholar
  4. Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., Nilsson, Reboh, R., Slocum, J., and Sutherland, G. L., 1977, Development of a Computer-Based Consultant for Mineral Exploration: Annual Report SRI Projects 5821 and 6415. 1 October 1976 to 30 September 1977, Menlo Park, California, 202 p.Google Scholar
  5. Gaschnig, J. 1980, Development of Uranium Exploration Models for the Prospector Consultant System: Final Report SRI Project 7856, Menlo Park, California, 603 p.Google Scholar
  6. McCammon, R. B., 1984, Recent Developments in Prospector and Future Expert Systems: IEEE Proceedings Pecora IX Spatial Information Technologies for Remote Sensing Today and Tomorrow, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, p. 243–248.Google Scholar
  7. McCammon, R. B., 1989a, Prospector II—The Redesign of Prospector: AI Systems in Government, March 27–31, 1989. Washington, D.C., p. 88–92.Google Scholar
  8. McCammon, R. B., 1989b. Progress Report on the Calibration of Numerical Mineral Deposit Models (abs): 18th Geochautauqua on Mineral Resource Assessment “Integrated Approaches,” October 13–14. Newark, Delaware, p. 17.Google Scholar
  9. McCammon. R. B., Light, T. D., and Rinehart, C. D., 1988, Mineral Resource Assessment for Part of the White Mountains National Recreation Area,in Galloway. J. P., and Hamilton, T. D., eds.,Geologic Studies in Alaska by the U.S. Geological Survey During 1987: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1016, p. 71–74.Google Scholar
  10. Nokleberg, W. J., Bundtzen, T. K., Berg, H. C., Brew, D. A., Grybeck, D., Robinson, M. S., Smith, T. E., and Yeend, W., 1987, Significant Metalliferous Lode Deposits and Placer Districts of Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1786, 104 p.Google Scholar
  11. Reboh, R., and Reiter, J., 1983. A Knowledge-Based System for Regional Mineral Resource Assessment: Final Report SRI Project 4119, Menlo Park, California, 267 p.Google Scholar
  12. Reed, B. L., 1986. Descriptive Model of Sn Greisen Deposits,in D. P. Cox and D. A. Singer, eds.,Mineral Deposit Models: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1693, 379 p.Google Scholar
  13. Singer, D. A., and Cox, D. P., 1988, Applications of Mineral Deposit Models to Resource Assessments: U.S. Geological Survey Yearbook Fiscal Year 1987, p. 55–57.Google Scholar
  14. Weber, F. R., McCammon, R. B., Rinehart. C. D., Light, T. D., and Wheeler, K. L., 1988, Geology and Mineral Resources of the White Mountains National Recreation Area. East-Central Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 88-284, 120 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard B. McCammon
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyReston

Personalised recommendations