Mathematical Geology

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 259–278 | Cite as

The use of stochastic simulations and geophysical logs to characterize spatial heterogeneity in hydrogeologic parameters

  • Terry D. Lahm
  • E. Scott Bair
  • Franklin W. Schwartz
Article

Abstract

Characterization of the spatial distribution of hydrogeologic parameters in an aquifer is important to understanding the hydrodynamics of a groundwater flow system. The operational procedure presented in this paper uses core permeability and porosity data and geophysical logs to characterize hydrogeologic parameters, especially hydraulic conductivity (K). The procedure is illustrated with a geostatistical analysis of the permeability distribution along a 120 km cross section of the Milk River aquifer in Alberta, Canada. Geologic and hydrogeologic data from aquifers come in a variety of forms. In deep, regional aquifers, the most ubiquitous form usually is geophysical logs that are used to determine spatial variations in the thickness, porosity, and permeability as well as other rock properties of hydrostratigraphic units. Several methods of deriving hydraulic conductivity values from geophysical logs are evaluated with respect to the Milk River aquifer. Based on a statistical evaluation, a direct relation between porosity and permeability was selected. Once the hydrogeologic data were analyzed and evaluated, a stochastic approach using Bayesian updating with Cholesky decomposition is used to describe the spatial heterogeneity of hydraulic conductivity. This approach produces random-correlated fields of hydraulic conductivity that are conditioned at specific locations by the geophysically derived hydraulic conductivity values. The conditioned, random-correlated fields of hydraulic conductivity are a description of relatively small-scale heterogeneity in the hydraulic conductivity field that can be used in a numerical transport model as a detailed, spatial description of hydraulic conductivity.

Key words

Bayesian updating conditioned simulations Milk River aquifer random-correlated fields 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alabert, F., 1987, The practice of fast conditional simulations through the LU decomposition of the covariance matrix: Math. Geology, v. 19, no. 5, p. 369–386.Google Scholar
  2. Biella, G., Lozej, A., and Tabacco, I., 1983, Experimental study of some hydrogeophysical properties of unconsolidated porous media: Ground Water, v. 21, no. 6, p. 741–751.Google Scholar
  3. Chilingar, G. V., 1963, Relationship between porosity, permeability, and grain-size distribution of sands and sandstones: Proc. Intern. Sedimentology Congress, Amsterdam, Antwerp, p. 71–75.Google Scholar
  4. Clifton, P. M., and Neuman, S. P., 1982, Effects of kriging and inverse modeling on conditional simulation of the Avra Valley aquifer in southern Arizona: Water Res. Research, v. 18, no. 4, p. 1215–1234.Google Scholar
  5. Croft, M. G., 1971, A method of calculating permeability from electric logs: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 750-B, p. B265–B269.Google Scholar
  6. de Marsily, G., 1986, Quantitative hydrogeology, groundwater hydrology for engineers: Academic Press, San Diego, California, 440 p.Google Scholar
  7. Domenico, P. A., and Schwartz, F. W., 1990. Physical and chemical hydrogeology: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 824 p.Google Scholar
  8. Doveton, J. H., 1986, Log analysis of subsurface geology, concepts and computer methods: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 273 p.Google Scholar
  9. Fogg, G. E., Lucia, F. J., and Senger, R. K., 1991, Stochastic simulation of interwell-scale heterogeneity for improved prediction of sweep efficiency in a carbonate reservoir,in Lake, L. W., Carroll, H. B., Jr., and Wesson, T. C., eds., Reservoir characterization II: Academic Press, New York, p. 355–381.Google Scholar
  10. Freeze, R. A., 1975. A stochastic-conceptual analysis of one-dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneous media: Water Res. Research, v. 11. no. 5, p. 725–741.Google Scholar
  11. Freeze, R. A., and Cherry, J. A., 1979. Groundwater: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 604 p.Google Scholar
  12. Freeze, R. A., Massmann, J. Smith, L., Sperling, T., and James, B., 1990, Hydrogeological decision analysis: 1. A framework: Ground Water, v. 28, no. 5, p. 738–766.Google Scholar
  13. Gelhar, L. W., 1986, Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to applications: Water Res. Research, v. 22, no. 9, p. 135s-145s.Google Scholar
  14. Hachich, W., and Vanmarcke, E. H., 1983, Probabilistic updating of pore pressure fluids: Jour. Geotechnical Engineering, Div. Am. Soc. Civil Engineering, v. 109, p. 373–385.Google Scholar
  15. Hearst, J. R., and Nelson, P. H., 1985, Well logging for physical properties: McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 571 p.Google Scholar
  16. Hendry, M. J., Schwartz, F. W., and Robertson, C., 1991, Hydrogeology and hydrochemistry of the Milk River aquifer system Alberta. Canada: a review: Applied Geochemistry, v. 6, no. 4. p. 369–380.Google Scholar
  17. Hess, K. M., Wolf, S. H., and Celia, M. A., 1992, Large-scale natural gradient tracer test in sand and gravel, Cape Cod, Massachusetts 3. Hydraulic conductivity variability and calculated macrodispersivities: Water Res. Research, v. 28, no. 8, p. 2011–2027.Google Scholar
  18. Hoeksema, R. J., and Kitanidis, P. K., 1985, Analysis of the spatial structure of properties of selected aquifers: Water Res. Research, v. 21, no. 4, p. 563–572.Google Scholar
  19. Jorgensen, D. G., 1989, Using geophysical logs to estimate porosity, water resistivity, and intrinsic permeability: U.S. Geol. Survey Water-Supply Paper 2321, 24 p.Google Scholar
  20. Journel, A. G., and Huijbregts, Ch. J., 1978, Mining geostatistics: Academic Press, New York, 600 p.Google Scholar
  21. Kelly, W. E., 1977, Geoelectric sounding for estimating aquifer hydraulic conductivity: Ground Water, v. 15, no. 6, p. 420–425.Google Scholar
  22. Keys, S. W., and MacCary, L. M., 1971, Application of borehole geophysics to water-resources investigations: U.S. Geol. Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 2, 123 P.Google Scholar
  23. Mantoglou, A., and Wilson, J. L., 1982, The turning bands method for simulation of random fields using line generation by a spectral method: Water Res. Research, v. 18, no. 5, p. 1379–1394.Google Scholar
  24. Massmann, J., 1990, MTS2D. FOR: unpublished FORTRAN code, Dept. Civil Engineering. Univ. of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
  25. Massmann, J., and Freeze, R. A., 1987, Groundwater contamination from waste management sites: the interaction between rick-based engineering design and regulatory policy 1. Methodology: Water Res. Research, v. 23, no. 2, p. 351–367.Google Scholar
  26. Massmann, J. W., and Freeze, R. A., 1989, Updating random hydraulic conductivity fields: a two-step procedure: Water Res. Research, v. 25, no. 7, p. 1763–1765.Google Scholar
  27. McCrossan, R. G., and Glaister, R. P., eds., 1964, Geological history of Western Canada: Alberta Soc. Petroleum Geologists, Calgary, Alberta, 232 p.Google Scholar
  28. Meijer Drees, N. C., and Mhyr, D. W., 1981, The upper Cretaceous Milk River and Lea Park formations in southeastern Alberta: Bull. Can. Petrol. Geology, v. 29, no. 1, p. 42–74.Google Scholar
  29. Meyboom, P., 1960, Geology and groundwater resources of the Milk River Sandstone in southern Alberta: Research Counc. Alberta, Mem. 2, 89 p.Google Scholar
  30. Robin, M. J. L., Gutjahr, A. L., Sudicky, E. A., and Wilson, J. L., 1993, Cross-correlated random field generation with the direct Fourier transform method: Water Res. Research, v. 29, no. 7, p. 2385–2397.Google Scholar
  31. Smith, L., 1981, Spatial variability of flow parameters in a stratified sand: Math. Geology, v. 13, no. 1, p. 1–21.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, L., and Schwartz, F. W., 1981, Mass transport, 2. Analysis of uncertainty predictions: Water Res. Research, v. 17, no. 2, p. 351–369.Google Scholar
  33. Sudicky, E. A., 1986. A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and its role in the dispersion process: Water Res. Research, v. 22, no. 13, p. 2069–2082.Google Scholar
  34. Timur, A., 1968, An investigation of permeability, porosity, and residual water saturation relationships for sandstone reservoirs: Log Analyst, v. 9. no. 4, p. 8–17.Google Scholar
  35. Toth, J., and Corbet, T., 1986, Post-Paleocene evolution of regional groundwater flow-systems and their relation to petroleum accumulations, Taber area, southern Alberta. Canada: Bull. Can. Petrol. Geology, v. 34, no. 3, p. 339–363.Google Scholar
  36. Urish, D. W., 1981, Electrical resistivity-hydraulic conductivity relationships in glacial outwash aquifers: Water Res. Research, v. 17, no. 5, p. 1401–1408.Google Scholar
  37. Wendt, W. A., Sakurai, S., and Nelson. P. H., 1986, Permeability prediction from well logs using multiple regression,in Lake. L. W., and Carroll, H. B., Jr. eds., Reservoir characterization: p. 181–221.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terry D. Lahm
    • 1
  • E. Scott Bair
    • 1
  • Franklin W. Schwartz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geological SciencesThe Ohio State UniversityColumbus

Personalised recommendations