Skip to main content
Log in

Method of choice for urinary diversion in surgical treatment of bladder carcinoma

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evidence is presented concerning 94 patients with malignancy of bladder in whom diversion of urine was performed after cystectomy for exclusion of the baldder. There were 80 men and 14 women, ages ranging from 30 to 81 years. In 35 of these 94 cases ureterosigmoidoanastomosis, in 38 cases ureterocutaneostomy, in 15 Portilla's operation, in 2 Bricker's method and in 4 nephro-pyelostomy were performed. For the prevention of bleeding cystectomy was preceded by bilateral ligation of the internal iliac artery in 14 cases.

Continuous postoperative follow-up of the patients (from a few months to 14 years) and analysis of the early and late results allow to regard the combined technique of Coffey II-Nesbit-Goodwin as the method of choice having the slightest risk of peritonitis, intestinoureteral reflux and other complications inherent in other procedures. Of the existing methods of ureterocutaneostomy the authors have chosen Le Dentu's method with some modifications. They consider ureterostomy to be the simplest and quickest method owing to the higher location of ureterostoma. Portilla's method is no longer used because of its unfavourable long-term results.

Of 94 patients with cancer of the bladder, who had been subjected to different methods of urinary diversion in the years 1954–1974, 16 have survived up till now. There are 10 survivors after ureterosigmoidoanastomosis, 5 after ureterocutaneostomy and 1 after Bricker's operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lopatkin, N. A.: Urinary diversion after cystectomy. Proceedings of the 5th Union Conference of Urologists. Moscow 1967, part 2, pp. 67–68.

  2. Martinov, A. V.: Transplantation of the ureters into the rectum. Proceedings of the 15th Congress of Russian Surgeons. Petersburg 1923, p. 344.

  3. Pytel, A. J.: Surgical treatment of cancer of the bladder.J. Urol. Nephrol. (Moscow),3, 33–48 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tzulukidze, A. P., Murvanidze, D. D., Dvali, R. F., Ivashchenko, G. M.: Formation of a new plastic reservoir for urine after total cystectomy.J. Urol. Nephrol. (Moscow),1, 46 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bricker, E. M.: Symposium on clinical surgery: bladder substitution after pelvic evisceration.Surg. Clin. N. Amer. 30, 1511 (1950).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chute, R., Sallade, R. L.: Bilateral side-by-side cutaneous ureterostomy in the midline for urinary diversion.J. Urol., 85, 280 (1961).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coffey, R. C.: Transplantation of the ureters into the large intestine in the absence of functioning urinary bladder.Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 32, 383 (1921).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goodwin, W. E., Harris, A. P., Kaufmann, J. J., Beal, J. M.: Open transcolonic uretero-intestinal anastomosis; new approach.Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 97, 295 (1953).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lange, J., Lange, D., Phelippot, J. L., Valentin, F.: Cystectomies totales. Résultats de 200 observations.J. Urol. Néphrol. (Paris)79, 99 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Le Dentu, A. Affections chirurgicales des reins, des uretères et des capsules surrénales. Masson, Paris 1889, V, p. 803.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nesbit, R. M.: Ureterosigmoid anastomosis by direct elliptical anastomosis; a preliminary report.J. Urol. 61, 728 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Portilla Sanches, R., Blanco, F. L., Santamarina, A., Casals Roa, J.: Vesical regeneration in the human after total cystectomy and implantation of the plastic mould.Brit. J. Urol. 30, 180 (1958).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sorrentino, M.: Quelques considérations sur les procédés de dérivation haute des urines.Acta Urol. Belg. 31, 5 (1963).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Steg, A., Vignes, C., Aboulker, P.: A propos de cas d'implantation urétérocolique selon la technique de “Goodwin” après cystectomie totale.Ann. Urol. (Paris)5, 161 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lopatkin, N.A., Mazo, E.B. & Vartanyan, O.K. Method of choice for urinary diversion in surgical treatment of bladder carcinoma. International Urology and Nephrology 8, 113–120 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02082206

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02082206

Keywords

Navigation