Abstract
Treatment of penile fracture, due to the low number of cases, still lacks adequate documentation. The authors present two cases of such pathology, which were treated conservatively, and presented penile deformities in the late follow up. Both conservative and surgical management are discussed; since surgery in these cases has low mortality and clinical treatment can be followed by various sequelae, the authors favour the former, stressing that it is mandatory in cases with urinary obstruction, progressive infiltration or cutaneous laceration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Thompson, R. F.: Rupture (fracture) of penis.J. Urol., 71, 226 (1954).
Greecy, A. A., Beazlie, F. S. Jr.: Fracture of the penis: traumatic rupture of corpara cavernosa.J. Urol., 78, 620 (1957).
Meares, E. M.: Traumatic rupture of the corpus cavernosum.J. Urol., 105, 407 (1971).
Gross, M.: Fracture of the penis: retionale of surgical management.J. Urol., 106, 708 (1971).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dénes, F.T., Netto, N.R., Srougi, M. et al. Traumatic rupture of the corpora cavernosa. International Urology and Nephrology 9, 317–320 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02081949
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02081949