International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 139–151 | Cite as

Ureteral reconstruction and its problems

  • K. Uhlir
Article
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

Ileoplasty has proved superior to all other procedures for ureteral reconstruction by substituting healthy tissue of normal blood and nerve supply for damaged ureteral portions and thus avoiding late complications inherent in other techniques. Occasional complications involved by the method usually give no major cause for concern. Ileoplasty saved the kidney and even the life of the patients. The majority of patients could lead a normal life after operation. Ureteral replacement by an intestinal loop is regarded as a highly significant contribution to urological surgery.

Keywords

Public Health Significant Contribution Normal Blood Healthy Tissue Late Complication 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Petkovics, S.: Les indications, et les techniques différentes de l'anastomose urétérovésicale et leur résultats.J. d'Urol. 62, 225 (1956).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Puigvert, A.: Cirurgia del uréter terminal. Anales del hospital de la Santa Cruz y San Pablo. Vol.XXVIII, Numl. 1–8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pyrah, L. N., Raper, F. P.: Some uses of an isolated loop of ileum in genito-urinary surgery.Brit. J. Urol. 42, 22 (1955).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quénu, L.: Les bases anatomiques de l'iléo-urétéro-cystoplastie.J. d'Urol. 63, 237 (1957).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scheele, K.: Die Dünndarmringplastik der narbigen Schrumfblase. 2. Aufl. VEB Georg Thieme, Leipzig 1950.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Strohmenger, P., Sack, H.: Resorption radioaktiv markierter Substanzen aus Harnblase und isolierter Dünndarmschlinge.Urol. Int. 21, 538 (1966).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Uhlir, K.: IV. vsesvazová konference urologu, 1961. Moscow 1963, 104.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Uhlir, K., Neuwirt, K.: The effect of irradiation of the pelvic region on the urinary system. XII. Congr. Soc. int. urol., Rio de Janeiro,1, 433 (1961).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Uhlir, K.: Die Verletzung des Harnleiters bei gynäkologischen, Operationen.Z. f. Urol. 58, 581 (1965).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Uhlir, K.: Ileoplastika v urologii.Cas. lék. ces. 30–31, 959 (1960).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Uhlir, K.: Die Ileoplastik in der Urologie und ihre Resultate.Z. f. Urol. 56, 479 (1963).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Uhlir, K., Chaloupka: Nervous tissue in experimental irradiation cystitis.Urologia 27, 397 (1960).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Uhlir, K.: Replacement of the entire ureter by the small intestine.Urologia 31, 712 (1964).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Uhlir, K.: Some problems in replacement of parts of the urinary tract.Jap. J. Urol. 59, 755 (1968).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Uhlir, K.: Gynaecological injuries to the ureter.Urologia 37, 1 fasc. III (1970).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Uhlir, K.: Solitary kidney surgery.Internat. Urology and Nephrology 3, 111 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Uhlir
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of UrologyJ. E. Purkinje UniversityBrnoCzechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations