Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of ureteral calculi with the Zeiss loop

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

342 patients with ureteral calculi were treated with the Zeiss loop. In 5 of the patients the loop was used bilaterally. The calculus was removed in 287 (82.7%) cases. Treatment with the loop failed in 60 (16.3%) patients. Best results with this treatment were achieved when the calculi were located in the lower third of the ureter. Here 87.6% of the calculi could be removed. When the loop was utilized in the middle third of the ureter treatment proved successful in 76.3% of the cases whereas 61.9% of the patients were successfully treated when the stone was in the upper third of the ureter. In one case perforation of the ureter occurred after a loop which had been in place for 8 days was pulled. In another patient the loop got caught and had to be removed by an open procedure. Two patients (0.58%) died during treatment, one of them of consequences of his underlying diesease, the other one succumbed to urosepsis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albrecht, K. F., Metzger, D.: Zur Behandlung des Harnleitersteines mit Schlingenkathetern.Urologe, 9, 178 (1970).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bandhauer, K.: Therapie des Uretersteines.Actuelle Urol. 1, 42 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bandhauer, K., Frick, J., Marberger, H.: Der Wert periodischer Spasmolyticagaben beim eingeklemmten Harnleiterstein.Langenbecks Arch. klin. Chir. 313, 467 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beominghaus, H.: Diagnostische, klinische und therapeutische Betrachtungen zum Harnleiterstein.Z. Urol. 54, 127 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fox, M., Pyrah, L. N., Raper F. R.: Management of ureteric stones: A review of 292 cases.Brit. J. Urol. 37, 660 (1965).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Higgins, C. C., Straffon, R. A.: Urology, 2nd Ed. Saunders, Philadelphia 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karcher, G.: Beitrag zur transurethralen Uretersteinentfernung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung evtl. Spätfolgen.Urologe, 3, 135 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kolle, P.: Zur Diagnostik und Therapie der Harnleitersteine.Münch. med. Wschr. 101, 1611 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krebs, W.: Zystoskopische Ureterolithotomie.Chirurg 30, 299 (1959).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Prince, Ch. L., Scardino, P.: A statistical analysis of ureteral calculi,J. Urol. (Baltimore)83, 561 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zeiss, L.: Über eine neue Methode der konservativen Harnleitersteinbehandlung. (Die Harnleitersteinextraktion mit dem Schlingenkatheter).Z. Urol. 33, 121 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagel, R., Marquardt, H. & Grull, S. Treatment of ureteral calculi with the Zeiss loop. International Urology and Nephrology 4, 215–220 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02081874

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02081874

Keywords

Navigation