Abstract
Objective. There is no data on the use of hospital-wide online edical record (OLMR) systems by anesthesiologists. We measured how often anesthesiologists accessed the OLMR database maintained by the hospital, how often data was copied from this database into the clinic's computer system, and how much data was copied.Methods. In a preanesthetic evaluation clinic that has a computerized evaluation system designed for physician-entered data, a graphical user-interface prototype link provided access to the hospital OLMR database for users and was studied over a 37-day period. The software allowed the user to search the OLMR system by patient name, retrieve a text listing of the patient's record, and then copy and paste desired information into the forms of the preanesthetic system. Using embedded routines, we recorded how many times physicians searched for and retrieved medical records from the hospital OLMR database, as well as how many times they copied data to the preoperative database. As a measure of howmuch data was copied, the number of characters was also recorded.Results. Of 1,080 patients evaluated in the clinic during the study period, electronic searches of the hospital OLMR database for 221 patients (20.5%) were noted. Of these searches, 208 (94.1%, or 19.3% of 1,080 patients) successfullyretrieved data from the patient's record. Data wascopied for 170 patients — 81.7% of the successful searches. Of 7,525,153 characters retrieved, 262,269 were copied — an average of 1,543 characters per instance of copying.Conclusion. We conclude that anesthesiologists, given even crude graphical access to a hospital OLMR database, will retrieve and copy data, potentially increasing the accuracy of the medical records and saving time.
References
Murphy G. System and data protection. In: Ball MJ, Collen MF, eds. Aspects of the computer-based patient record. New York: Springer-Verlag, c.1992: 208.
Gibby GL, Jackson KI, Gravenstein JS, Paulus DA. Development of problem categories for computerized preanesthesia evaluation of outpatients [abstract]. J Clin Monit 1992; 8: 156–157
Papaconstantiou CA, Gibby GL, JacksonKI, Gravenstein JS. Effectiveness of selectable text in the physical exam portion of a computerized preanesthetic evaluation [abstract]. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: A320
Gibby GL, Prescher MC, Paulus DA, Sirota DJ, Jackson K, Gravenstein JS, van der Aa JJ. Computerized preanesthesia evaluation of surgical inpatients increases secondary diagnoses noted by hospital coders [abstracted]. J Clin Monit 1995; 11: 268
Downey M, Mullersmann G. Andrews P. Electronic medical records: The UF/Shands experience. Proceedings of the 1995 Southeastern Medical Informatics Conference. Available from the Internet at the following address: http:// www.med.ufl.edu/medinfo/smic95/abslO.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gibby, G.L., Lemeer, G. & Jackson, K. Use of data from a hospital online medical records system by physicians during preanesthetic evaluation. J Clin Monitor Comput 12, 405–408 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02077638
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02077638