AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 339–356 | Cite as

Engineering perspectives and technology design in the United States

Abstract

Technology design has social as well as technical determinants. These social factors, such as the political context and social philosophy, vary historically and cross-nationally. The work upon which this paper is based addresses the nature of process technology design in the United States and focuses on the underlying assumptions that guide technology design, based on both historical analysis and survey and case studies of current design practices. Central to this work is an analysis of how the US approaches compare to some of the other industrial nations and the assumptions and implications of different social design concepts such as human-centered design, skill-based design, and human factors.

Keywords

Technology design Taylorism Engineering design Manufacturing Technology Human Factors Human-centred design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, P. (1986). New Technologies, New Skills.California Management Review, Fall.Google Scholar
  2. Alluisi, E.A. (1987). Human Factors Technologies-Past Promises, Future Issues. In L.S. Mark, J.S. Worm, R.L. Huston (eds)Ergonomics and Human Factors: Recent Research, Springer-Verlag. New York.Google Scholar
  3. Badham, R. and Shallock B. (1991). Human Factors in CIM: A Human Centered Perspective Form Europe. University of Wollongong, Australia. (Unpublished paper.)Google Scholar
  4. Blackler, F. and Brown, C. (1986). Alternative Models to Guide the Design and Introduction of the New Information technologies into Work Organizations.Journal of Occupational Psychology, January: 187–313.Google Scholar
  5. Blanchard, B. and Fabrycky, W. (1981).Systems Engineering and Analysis Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  6. Blumenthal, M. and Dray, J. (1985). The Automated Factory: Vision and Reality.Technology Review, January: 29–37.Google Scholar
  7. Boguslaw, R. (1965).The New Utopians: A Study of System Design and Social Change. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  8. Brodner, P. (1986). Skill Based Manufacturing vs. ‘Unmanned Factory’—Which is Superior?International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1. 145–153.Google Scholar
  9. Burawoy, M, (1979).Manufacturing Consent, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Chems, A. (1987). Principles of Sociotechnical Design Revisted.Human Relations, 40 (3), 153–162.Google Scholar
  11. Coulter, J. (1979).The Social Construction of Mind. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  12. Coulter, J. (1983).Rethinking Cognitive Learning. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  13. Dreyfus, H. (1979).What Computers Can't Do. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Dreyfuss, H. (1967).The Measure of Man: Human Factors in Design. Whitney Library of Design, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Ehn, P. (1989).Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts, Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Ehn, P. and Morten K. (1987). The Collective Resource Approach to Systems Design. In G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, and M. Kyng (eds.)Computers and Democracy: A Scandanavian Challenge, Avebury Gower Publishing Co. Ltd, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  17. Ellis, D.O. and Ludwig, F.J. (1962).Systems Philosophy. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  18. Gibson, J.E. (1968).Introduction to Engineering Design. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Gordon, D.E., Edwards, R. and Reich, M. (1982)Segmented Work. Divided Workers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. Hindhede, U. (1983).Machine Design Fundamentals—A Practical Approach. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Hirschhorn, L. (1984).Beyond Mechanization. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).Google Scholar
  22. Hobsbawm, E. (1984).Workers: Worlds of Labor. Pantheon Books, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Jaikumar, R. (1986). Postindustrial Manufacturing.Harvard Business Review, November–December 69–76.Google Scholar
  24. Kusterer, K. (1978).Know-How on the job Westview Press, Boulder (CO).Google Scholar
  25. Landes, D.S. (1969).The Unbound Prometheus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  26. Lund, R., Bishop, A., Salzman, H. and Newman, A. (1991)Principles of Machine/Human Compatibility in Manufacturing Systems. Final Report to the National Science Foundation, Engineering Division, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  27. Majchrzak, A. (1988).The Human Side of Factory Automation Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  28. Nelson, D. (1975).Workers and Managers. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
  29. Perrow, C. (1983). The Organizational Context of Human Factors Engineering.Administrative Science Quarterly, December 521–541.Google Scholar
  30. Piore, M.J. and Sabel, C.F. (1984).Second Industrial Divide Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Rosenthal, S. and Salzman, H. (1989). Values in the Design of New Technology: The Case of Software, Report to the National Science Foundation, Ethics and Values Studies Section, August.Google Scholar
  32. Rouse, W.B. and Cody, W.J. (1987). On the Design of Man-Machine Systems: Principles, Practices, and Prospects.IFAC World Congress, MunchenGoogle Scholar
  33. Salzman, H. (1989). Computer-Aided Design: Limitations in Automating Design and DraftingIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, November, 36 (4).Google Scholar
  34. Salzman, H. (1991). Skill-Based Design: The Case of Manufacturing Equipment. In P. Adler and T. Winograd (eds.)Usability: The Technology Design Challenge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Skinner, W. (1986). The Productivity Paradox.Harvard Business Review, July–August 55–59.Google Scholar
  36. Vidosic, J.P. (1969).Elements of Design Engineering. The Ronald Press Company, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Walton, R. and Susman, G. (1987). People Policies for New Machines.Harvard Business Review March–April.Google Scholar
  38. Zuboff, S. (1988).In the Age of the Smart Machine. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technology, Work and Organizations Program, Urban Research InstituteUniversity of LouisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations