Advertisement

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 37, Issue 5, pp 456–460 | Cite as

Results of Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse

  • Asha Senapati
  • R. J. Nicholls
  • J. P. S. Thomson
  • R. K. S. Phillips
Original Contributions

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to examine the results of Delorme's procedure. METHODS: Thirty-two patients (24 males and 8 females, mean age, 70 years) underwent Delorme's procedure between 1978 and 1990 following symptoms lasting between two weeks and ten years. Thirteen patients had had 21 previous operations for prolapse. RESULTS: The mean operation time was 65 minutes. No blood transfusions were needed, there was no operative mortality, and only two patients had complications (one chest infection and one anastomotic dehiscence). No patients were lost to follow-up. Over a mean follow-up of 24 months (4 months to 4 years), 9 patients died of unrelated conditions. There were four recurrences (12.5 percent), two in patients who had each had two previous procedures. Incontinence improved in 46 percent. No patient became constipated and 50 percent of those constipated preoperatively improved. CONCLUSION: Although abdominal rectopexy is safe and has a low recurrence rate (<5 percent), it involves the hazards of a laparotomy. In addition, up to 40 percent of patients become constipated after rectopexy which may be debilitating. Delorme's procedure has a low morbidity, results in good bowel function, and has a low recurrence rate. It can be performed on unfit patients with possible advantages over rectopexy and perhaps should be used more readily.

Key words

Rectal prolapse treatment Delorme's procedure fecal incontinence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wassef R, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Rectal prolapse. Curr Probl Surg 1986;23:398–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Delorme E. On the treatment of total prolapse of the rectum by excision of the rectal mucous membranes. Bull Mem Soc Chirurgie Paris 1900;26:499–518. 499–518.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abulafi AM, Sherman IW, Fiddian RV, Rothwell-Jackson RL. Delorme's operation for rectal prolapse. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990;72:382–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Houry S, Lechaux JP, Huguier M, Molkhou JM. Treatment of rectal prolapse by Delorme's operation. Int J Colorectal Dis 1987;2:149–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Uhlig BE, Sullivan ES. The modified Delorme operation. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:513–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Christiansen J, Kirkegaard P. Delorme's operation for complete rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1981;68:537–8.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gundersen AL, Cogbill TH, Landercasper J. Reappraisal of Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:721–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Monson JR, Jones NA, Vowden P, Brennan TG. Delorme's operation: the first choice in complete rectal prolapse? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1986;68:143–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heaton ND, Rennie JA. Extended abdominal rectopexy. Br J Surg 1988;75:828.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Penfold JC, Hawley PR. Experiences of Ivalonsponge implant for complete rectal prolapse at St. Mark's Hospital 1960–1970. Br J Surg 1972;59:846–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mann CV, Hoffman C. Complete rectal prolapse: the anatomical and functional results of treatment by an extended abdominal rectopexy. Br J Surg 1988;75:34–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morgan CN, Porter NH, Klugman DJ. Ivalon (polyvinyl alcohol) sponge in the repair of complete rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1972;59:841–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Atkinson KG, Taylor DC. Wells procedure for complete rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:96–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Holmstrom B, Broden G, Dolk A. Results of the Ripstein operation in the treatment of rectal prolapse and internal rectal procidentia. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:845–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keighley MR, Fielding JW, Alexander-Williams J. Results of Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 1983;70:229–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boulos PB, Stryker SJ, Nicholls RJ. The long-term results of polyvinyl alcohol (Ivalon) sponge for rectal prolapse in young patients. Br J Surg 1984;71:213–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rogers J, Jeffery PJ. Postanal repair and intersphincteric Ivalon sponge rectopexy for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1987;74:384–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Watts JD, Rothenberger DA, Buls JG, Goldberg SM, Nivatvongs S. The management of procidentia. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:96–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schlinkert RT, Beart RW, Wolff BG, Pemberton JH. Anterior resection for complete rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:409–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Speakman CT, Madden MV, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: results of a prospective randomised study. Br J Surg 1991;78:1431–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Keighley MR, Shouler PJ. Abnormalities of colonic function in patients with rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1984;71:892–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Madden MV, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Santhanam AN, Cabot R, Speakman CT. Abdominal rectopexy for complete prolapse: a prospective study evaluating changes in symptoms and anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:48–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Broden G, Dolk A, Holmstrom B. Evacuation difficulties and other characteristics of rectal function associated with procidentia and the Ripstein operation. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:283–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yoshioka K, Hyland G, Keighley MR. Anorectal function after abdominal rectopexy: parameters of predictive value in identifying return of continence. Br J Surg 1989;76:64–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Keighley MR, Markuria T, Alexander-Williams J, Arabi Y. Clinical and manometric evaluation of rectal prolapse and incontinence. Br J Surg 1980;67:54–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Holmstrom B, Broden G, Dolk A, Frenckner B. Increased anal resting pressure following the Ripstein operation. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:485–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Broden G, Dolk A, Holmstrom B. Recovery of the internal anal sphincter following rectopexy: a possible explanation for continence improvement. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;3:23–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Farouk R, Duthie GS, Bartolo DC, MacGregor AB. Restoration of continence following rectopexy for rectal prolapse and recovery of the internal anal sphincter electromyogram. Br J Surg 1992;79:439–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Finlay IG, Aitchison M. Perineal excision of the rectum for prolapse—a minimally invasive technique to improve functional outcome. Gut 1991;32:A558.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Asha Senapati
    • 1
  • R. J. Nicholls
    • 1
  • J. P. S. Thomson
    • 1
  • R. K. S. Phillips
    • 1
  1. 1.St. Mark's HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations