Abstract
The FASB in its Conceptual Framework has set high principles in the ethics of standard-setting in accounting. This paper concentrates on what the FASB calls the cost/benefit constraint, i.e., the commitment to setting an accounting standard only when the benefits of the standard exceeds the costs of that standard toall stakeholders. This constraint is supposed to take precedence over other concerns, such as neutrality (freedom from bias) of account information.
The major conclusion of this paper is that a conflict exists between the FASB's commitment and its practice. There is no evidence that the FASB has always made a costs and benefits judgement with respect to proposed standards. In the cases when such a judgement is made, the FASB discounts social costs; therefore, it is not considering costs to all stakeholders. At the same time the FASB discounts social costs, it seems to have an undue concern for standards that do not increase the volatility of net income. The Conceptual Framework explicitly defines costs as the costs to society as a whole.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beresford, D. R.: 1990a, ‘Notes from the Chairman’,FASB Financial Accounting Series No. 095, September 30, p. 2.
Beresford, D. R.: 1990b, ‘Financial Reporting: Comparability and Competition’,FASB Viewpoints, November 8, p. 3.
Brown, V. H.: 1990, ‘Accounting Standards: Their Economic and Political Consequences’,Accounting Horizons 4(3), 97.
Daley, L. A. and T. Tranter: 1990, ‘Limitations on the Value of the Conceptual Framework in Evaluating Extant Accounting Standards’,Accounting Horizons 4(1), 15–24.
Financial Accounting Standards Board: 1983,Facts About FASB (FASB, Norwalk, Conn).
Financial Accounting Standards Board: 1988,Accounting Standards: Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts (Irwin, Homewood, IL).
Financial Accounting Standards Board: 1992,Accounting Standards: Original Pronouncements: Volume 1-FASB Statements (Irwin, Homewood, IL).
Miller P. B. W. and R. J. Redding: 1988,The FASB: The People, the Process, and the Politics (Irwin, Homewood, IL).
Scott, D. J. and W. S. Upton: 1988, ‘Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions’,Highlights of Financial Reporting Issues, December 1988 (FASB, Norwalk, Conn), p. 4.
Wyatt, A.: 1990, ‘Accounting Standards: Conceptual or Political?’,Accounting Horizons 4(3), 84.
Zeff, S. A.: 1966, ‘Is the SEC at a Turning Point on Accounting Standards?’,FASB Financing Accounting Series No. 097, November 30, p. 7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Stanley Martens is an Assistant Professor of Accounting at DePaul University. He has written many articles for philosophy publications and accounting publications.
Kevin Stevens is an Assistant Professor of Accounting at DePaul University. He has written many articles for various accounting publications.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martens, S., Stevens, K. The FASB's cost/benefit constraint in theory and practice. J Bus Ethics 13, 171–179 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02074816
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02074816