Skip to main content
Log in

Zur Axiomatischen Charakterisierung Alternativer Vertragsprinzipien

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  • Arrow, Kenneth J.,Social Choice and Individual Values, 2. Aufl., New York, 1963.

  • Arrow, Kenneth J., ‘Values and Collective Decision-Making’ in Peter Laslett und W.G. Runciman, Hrsg.,Philosophy, Politics and Society, Bd. 3, Oxford, 1969, S. 215–232.

  • Arrow, Kenneth J., ‘Some Ordinalist-Utilitarian Notes on Rawls's Theory of Justice’, inJournal of Philosophy 70 (1973), 245–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, Kenneth J., ‘Extended Sympathy and the Possibility of Social Choice’, inAmerican Economic Review 67 (1977), 219–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S., ‘Inequality, Sociology, and Moral Philosophy’, inAmerican Journal of Sociology 80 (1975), 739–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Aspremont, Claude und Louis Gevers, ‘Equity and the Informational Basis of Collective Choice’, inReview of Economic Studies 44, 1977, 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deschamps, Robert und Louis Gevers, ‘Leximin and Utilitarian Rules: A Joint Characterization’,Working Paper, Faculté des Sciences Economiques et Sociales, Université de Namur, Namur 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, Wulf, ‘Über Kenneth Arrows Allgemeines Möglichkeitstheorem und einige Auswege aus dem Dilemma’,Diskussionsarbeiten der Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, 1977.

  • Hammond, Peter J., ‘Equity, Arrow's Conditions and Rawl's Difference Principle’, inEconometrica 44 (1976), 793–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M.,Freedom and Reason, Oxford, 1963.

  • Harsanyi, John C., ‘Nonlinear Social Welfare Functions’, inTheory and Decision 6 (1975a), 311–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, John C., ‘Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality?’, inAmerican Political Science Review 69 (1975b), 594–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, Lucian, ‘Neuere Ergebnisse der Theorie kollektiver Entscheidungen’, inZeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 133 (1977), 652–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, Lucian, ‘Comparative Distributive Ethics’, in Hans W. Gottinger und Werner Leinfellner, Hrsg.,Decision Theory and Social Ethics, Dordrecht-Boston, 1978, S. 187–200.

  • May, Kenneth O., ‘A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision’, inEconometrica 20 (1952), 680–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John,Eine Theorie der Gerechtigkeit, Frankfurt a. M., 1975.

  • Sen, Amartya K.,Collective Choice and Social Welfare, San Francisco-Edinburgh, 1970.

  • Sen, Amartya K.,On Economic Inequality, Oxford, 1973.

  • Sen, Amartya K., ‘Rawls versus Bentham: An Axiomatic Examination of the Pure Distribution Problem’, inTheory and Decision 4 (1974), 301–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya K., ‘Welfare Inequalities and Rawlsian Axiomatics’, inTheory and Decision 7 (1976), 243–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya K., ‘On Weights and Measures: Informational Constraints in Social Welfare Analysis’, inEconometrica 45 (1977), 1539–1572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Marcus George,Verallgemeinerung in der Ethik, Frankfurt a. M., 1975.

  • Strasnick, Stephen, ‘The Problem of Social Choice: Arrow to Rawls’, inPhilosophy and Public Affairs 5 (1975), 241–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, Patrick, ‘Some Formal Models of Grading Principles’, inSynthese 16 (1966), 284–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, Hal R., ‘Equity, Envy, and Efficency’, inJournal of Economic Theory 9 (1974), 63–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Ich habe Herrn Dr. Wulf Gaertner, Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Universität Bielefeld, für seine kritischen Hinweise und Anregungen sehr zu danken. Alle verbliebenen Fehler fallen selbstverständlich in meine Verantwortung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kern, L. Zur Axiomatischen Charakterisierung Alternativer Vertragsprinzipien. Erkenntnis 15, 1–31 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02074132

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02074132

Navigation