Literatur
Arrow, Kenneth J.,Social Choice and Individual Values, 2. Aufl., New York, 1963.
Arrow, Kenneth J., ‘Values and Collective Decision-Making’ in Peter Laslett und W.G. Runciman, Hrsg.,Philosophy, Politics and Society, Bd. 3, Oxford, 1969, S. 215–232.
Arrow, Kenneth J., ‘Some Ordinalist-Utilitarian Notes on Rawls's Theory of Justice’, inJournal of Philosophy 70 (1973), 245–263.
Arrow, Kenneth J., ‘Extended Sympathy and the Possibility of Social Choice’, inAmerican Economic Review 67 (1977), 219–263.
Coleman, James S., ‘Inequality, Sociology, and Moral Philosophy’, inAmerican Journal of Sociology 80 (1975), 739–764.
D'Aspremont, Claude und Louis Gevers, ‘Equity and the Informational Basis of Collective Choice’, inReview of Economic Studies 44, 1977, 199–209.
Deschamps, Robert und Louis Gevers, ‘Leximin and Utilitarian Rules: A Joint Characterization’,Working Paper, Faculté des Sciences Economiques et Sociales, Université de Namur, Namur 1976.
Gaertner, Wulf, ‘Über Kenneth Arrows Allgemeines Möglichkeitstheorem und einige Auswege aus dem Dilemma’,Diskussionsarbeiten der Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, 1977.
Hammond, Peter J., ‘Equity, Arrow's Conditions and Rawl's Difference Principle’, inEconometrica 44 (1976), 793–804.
Hare, R. M.,Freedom and Reason, Oxford, 1963.
Harsanyi, John C., ‘Nonlinear Social Welfare Functions’, inTheory and Decision 6 (1975a), 311–332.
Harsanyi, John C., ‘Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality?’, inAmerican Political Science Review 69 (1975b), 594–606.
Kern, Lucian, ‘Neuere Ergebnisse der Theorie kollektiver Entscheidungen’, inZeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 133 (1977), 652–680.
Kern, Lucian, ‘Comparative Distributive Ethics’, in Hans W. Gottinger und Werner Leinfellner, Hrsg.,Decision Theory and Social Ethics, Dordrecht-Boston, 1978, S. 187–200.
May, Kenneth O., ‘A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision’, inEconometrica 20 (1952), 680–684.
Rawls, John,Eine Theorie der Gerechtigkeit, Frankfurt a. M., 1975.
Sen, Amartya K.,Collective Choice and Social Welfare, San Francisco-Edinburgh, 1970.
Sen, Amartya K.,On Economic Inequality, Oxford, 1973.
Sen, Amartya K., ‘Rawls versus Bentham: An Axiomatic Examination of the Pure Distribution Problem’, inTheory and Decision 4 (1974), 301–309.
Sen, Amartya K., ‘Welfare Inequalities and Rawlsian Axiomatics’, inTheory and Decision 7 (1976), 243–262.
Sen, Amartya K., ‘On Weights and Measures: Informational Constraints in Social Welfare Analysis’, inEconometrica 45 (1977), 1539–1572.
Singer, Marcus George,Verallgemeinerung in der Ethik, Frankfurt a. M., 1975.
Strasnick, Stephen, ‘The Problem of Social Choice: Arrow to Rawls’, inPhilosophy and Public Affairs 5 (1975), 241–273.
Suppes, Patrick, ‘Some Formal Models of Grading Principles’, inSynthese 16 (1966), 284–306.
Varian, Hal R., ‘Equity, Envy, and Efficency’, inJournal of Economic Theory 9 (1974), 63–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Ich habe Herrn Dr. Wulf Gaertner, Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Universität Bielefeld, für seine kritischen Hinweise und Anregungen sehr zu danken. Alle verbliebenen Fehler fallen selbstverständlich in meine Verantwortung.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kern, L. Zur Axiomatischen Charakterisierung Alternativer Vertragsprinzipien. Erkenntnis 15, 1–31 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02074132
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02074132