Skip to main content
Log in

A note on contagion indices for landscape analysis

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The landscape contagion index measures the degree of clumping of attributes on raster maps. The index is computed from the frequencies by which different pairs of attributes occur as adjacent pixels on a map. Because there are subtle differences in the way the attribute adjacencies may be tabulated, the standard index formula may not always apply, and published index values may not be comparable. This paper derives formulas for the contagion index that apply for different ways of tabulating attribute adjacencies — with and without preserving the order of pixels in pairs, and by using two different ways of determining pixel adjacency. When the order of pixels in pairs is preserved, the standard formula is obtained. When the order is not preserved, a new formula is obtained because the number of possible attribute adjacency states is smaller. Estimated contagion is also smaller when each pixel pair is counted twice (instead of once) because double-counting pixel adjacencies makes the attribute adjacency matrix symmetric across the main diagonal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cain, D.H., Riitters, K. and Orvis, K. 1996. A multi-scale analysis of landscape statistics. Landscape Ecology, in press.

  • Cressie, N.A.C. 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data. Revised Edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R.H. and O'Neill, R.V. 1991. Pattern, process, and predictability: the use of neutral models for landscape analysis.In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. Edited by M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, R.C. and Woods, R.E. 1992. Digital Image Processing. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, E.J. and Parker, G.R. 1992. Relationships between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial pattern. Landscape Ecology 7: 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haralick, R.M., Shanmugam, K. and Dinstein, I. 1973. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 3: 610–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. and Reynolds, J.F. 1993. A new contagion index to quantify patterns of landscapes. Landscape Ecology 8: 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musick, H.B. and Grover, H.D. 1991. Image textural measures as indices of landscape pattern.In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. Edited by M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, R.V., Krummel, J.R., Gardner, R.H., Sugihara, G., Jackson, B., DeAngelis, D.L., Milne, B.T., Turner, M.G., Zygmunt, B., Christensen, S.W., Dale, V.H. and Graham, R.L. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1: 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, R.V., Hunsaker, C.T., Timmins, S.P., Jackson, B.L., Jones, K.B., Riitters, K.H. and Wickham, J.D. 1996. Scale problems in reporting landscape pattern at the regional scale. Landscape Ecology, in press.

  • Pastor, J. and Broschart, M. 1990. The spatial pattern of a northern conifer-hardwood landscape. Landscape Ecology 4: 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riitters, K.H., O'Neill, R.V., Hunsaker, C.T., Wickham, J.D., Yankee, D.H., Timmins, S.P., Jones, K.B. and Jackson, B.L. 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology 10: 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 171–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. and Gardner, R.H. (eds.). 1991. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham, J.D. and Riitters, K.H. 1995. Sensitivity of landscape metrics to pixel size. Int. J. Remote Sensing 16: 3585–3594.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riitters, K.H., O'Neill, R.V., Wickham, J.D. et al. A note on contagion indices for landscape analysis. Landscape Ecol 11, 197–202 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02071810

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02071810

Keywords

Navigation