Abstract
According to popular opinion, thought experiments are limited in scope, since no novel empirical results could be expected to be produced by thought alone. Yet consider the spectacular 16th century experiment by Stevin. leading to the discovery of the principles of the resolution and combination of forces. He conducted no experiments, for he derived his novel and highly important conclusions by several steps of ingenious reasoning alone. To understand why mental experiments may serve as very effective scientific tools. we need to explicate carefully their underlying mechanism. Thought experiments invariably involve the widely debated notion of “counterfactual conditionals.” A variety of historical examples are offered designed to illustrate the nature of thought experiments, their associated counterfactual conditionals. as well a the nature of the vital link between the two.
References
Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy, T. Horowitz and G. J. Massey, eds. (Rowman & Littlefield, Savage, North Dakota, 1991); henceforth TESP.
P. Davies,God and the New Physics, (Simon & Schuster, New York. 1983), p. 136.
E. Nagel,The Structure of Physics (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1961), p. 282.
G. Gamow,The Biography of Physics, (Harper & Row, New York. 1961), p. 114.
Davis,op. cit., p. 212.
“Ueber der Zustand des Warmegleichtgewichtes Eines System von Korpern,”Sitzungberichte, p. 135.
TESP, 113.
TESP, 209.
T. Kuhn,The Essential Tension (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1977), p. 241.
TESP, 256.
R. Sorensen,Thought Experiments (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992), p. 82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schlesinger, G.N. The power of thought experiments. Found Phys 26, 467–482 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02071216
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02071216