Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 217–226 | Cite as

Isolation and properties of bacteriocin-tolerant mutants ofKlebsiella edwardsii var.edwardsii

  • F. K. de Graaf
  • A. H. Stouthamer


Bacteriocin-resistant mutants ofKlebsiella edwardsii var.edwardsii were isolated, some of which, although still adsorbing the bacteriocin, were nevertheless insensitive (tolerant) to its effect.

Selection was carried out with bacteriocins produced byKlebsiella pneumoniae (strains S6 and S8) andEnterobacter cloacae (strain DF 13). These bacteriocins are adsorbed by different receptor sites but have the same mode of action. Most of the isolated mutants (80–90%) could no longer adsorb any of the bacteriocins used. Therefore it is suggested that the different receptor sites on sensitive bacteria have some components in common. Seven different groups of tolerant mutants were isolated. The majority of these mutants are tolerant to the three bacteriocins used (Group I). In the other groups tolerance to one or two bacteriocins is accompanied by either sensitivity to, or resistance (non-adsorption) against, the other(s). The latter mutants must be considered as receptor mutants in which the specific stimulus sent from the bacteriocin receptor site through the cytoplasmic membrane to the intracellular target fails to initiate. Many tolerant mutants were extremely sensitive to desoxycholate and to ethylenediaminetetraacetate.


Cytoplasmic Membrane Receptor Site Specific Stimulus Receptor Mutant Intracellular Target 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adelberg, E. A., Mandel, M. andChen, G. C. C. 1965. Optimal conditions for mutagenesis by N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine inEscherichia coli K12. - Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.18: 788–795.Google Scholar
  2. Clowes, R. C. andMoody, E. E. M. 1965. Mutational immunity to a colicin. - J. Gen. Microbiol.39: XI-XII.Google Scholar
  3. Fredericq, P. 1948. Actions antibiotiques réciproques chez les Enterobacteriaceae. - Rev. Belge Pathol. Med. Exp.29: (suppl. 4), 1–107.Google Scholar
  4. Fredericq, P. 1963. Colicines et autres bactériocines. - Ergeb. Mikrobiol. Immunitaetsforsch. Exp. Ther. Berlin37: 114–161.Google Scholar
  5. de Graaf, F. K., Spanjaerdt Speckman, E. A. andStouthamer, A. H. 1969. Mode of action of a bacteriocin produced byEnterobacter cloacae DF13. - Antonie van Leeuwenhoek35: 287–306.Google Scholar
  6. de Graaf, F. K., Tieze, G. A., Wendelaar Bonga, Sj. andStouthamer, A. H. 1968. Purification and genetic determination of bacteriocin production inEnterobacter cloacae. - J. Bacteriol.95: 631–640.Google Scholar
  7. Hill, C. andHolland, I. B. 1967. Genetic basis of colicin E susceptibility inEscherichia coli. 1. Isolation and properties of refractory mutants and the preliminary mapping of their mutations. - J. Bacteriol.94: 677–686.Google Scholar
  8. Itikawa, H. 1966. Changes in bacterial properties accompanied by the resistance to colicin E, inEscherichia coli K12. - Bot. Mag. Tokyo,79: 660–664.Google Scholar
  9. Jacob, F. Siminovitch, L. etWollman, E. 1952. Sur la biosynthèse d'une colinine et sur son mode d'action. - Ann. Inst. Pasteur83: 295–315.Google Scholar
  10. Maeda, A. andNomura, M. 1966. Interaction of colicins with bacterial cells. I. Studies with radioactive colicins. - J. Bacteriol.91: 685–694.Google Scholar
  11. Nagel de Zwaig, R. andLuria, S. E. 1967. Genetics and physiology of colicin-tolerant mutants ofEscherichia coli. - J. Bacteriol.94: 1112–1123.Google Scholar
  12. Nomura, M. 1964. Mechanism of action of colicines. - Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.52: 1514–1521.Google Scholar
  13. Nomura, M. andMaeda, A. 1965. Mechanism of action of colicins. - Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenk. Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt. 1M.H. Orig.196: 216–239.Google Scholar
  14. Nomura, M. andNakamura, M. 1962. Reversibility of inhibition of nucleic acids and protein synthesis by colicin K. - Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.7: 306–309.Google Scholar
  15. Nomura, M. andWitten, C. 1967. Interaction of colicins with bacterial cells. III. Colicintolerant mutations inEscherichia coli. - J. Bacteriol.94: 1093–1111.Google Scholar
  16. Reeves, P. 1966. Mutants resistant to colicin CA42-E2: Cross resistance and genetic mapping of a special class of mutants. - Aust. J. Exp. Biol. Med. Sci.44: 301–316.Google Scholar
  17. Reynolds, B. L. andReeves, P. R. 1963. Some observations on the mode of action of colicin F. - Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.11: 140–145.Google Scholar
  18. Šmarda, J. andSchuhmann, E. 1967. Do certain colicines and phages share common receptors? - Nature213: 614.Google Scholar
  19. Šmarda, J. andTaubeneck, U. 1968. Situation of colicin receptors in surface layers of bacterial cells.- J. Gen. Microbiol.52: 161–172.Google Scholar
  20. Stouthamer, A. H. andTieze, G. A. 1966. Bacteriocin production by members of the genusKlebsiella. - Antonio van Leeuwenhoek32: 171–182.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Swets & Zeitlinger 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. K. de Graaf
    • 1
  • A. H. Stouthamer
    • 1
  1. 1.Biological Laboratory, Microbiology DepartmentFree UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations