Skip to main content
Log in

Competition between benzene and styrene in forming radicals under different solvent conditions observed by muon level crossing resonance

  • Session 7. Redicals
  • Published:
Hyperfine Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The muon level-crossing-resonance technique has been used to resolve major discrepancies that exist in muon-spin-resonance studies (both free-radical formation and muonium decay rates) in the competition between benzene and styrene. The results, obtained for ∼30 mM solutions in ethanol and for 2.5 mM aqueous micelles solutions, show that muonium atoms (Mu) react 8 (±2) times faster with styrene than with benzene. In the above cases thermalized Mu is unquestionably the reactive species, which is known to show nucleophilic intra-molecular selectivity in the case of styrene. But a similar value, 9 (±2), was also obtained for undiluted mixtures of liquid benzene and styrene (neat mixture) — where the precursor might have been ‘hot Mu’ (which should display weaker selectivity than Mu) or cations derived fromμ + (which should show higher selectivity). These results support the view that thermalized Mu is the predominant reactive species in liquid benzene and styrene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. F. J. Cox, A. Hill and R. De Renzi, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.I 78 (1982) 2975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. W. Ng, J. M. Stadlbauer, Y. Ito, Y. Miyake, and D. C. Walker, Hyperfine Interactions17–19 (1984) 821.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. W. F. Louwrier, G. A. Brinkman and E. Roduner, Hyperfine Interactions32 (1986) 831.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. M. Stadlbauer, B. W. Ng, D. C. Walker, Y. C. Jean and Y. Ito, Can. J. Chem.59 (1981) 3261.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Roduner, Hyperfine Interactions17–19 (1984) 785.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Venkateswaran, M. V. Barnabas and D. C. Walker, Can. J. Phys.68 (1990) 952.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Stadlbauer, K. Venakteswaran, G. Porter and D. Walker, this conference.

  8. R. F. Kiefl, S. R. Kreitzman, M. Celio, R. Keitel, J. H. Brewer, G. M. Luke, D. R. Noakes, P. W. Percival, T. Matsuzaki and K. Nishiyama, Phys. Rev A34 (1986) 681.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Venkateswaran, M. V. Barnabas, R. F. Kiefl, J. M. Stadibauer and D. C. Walker, J. Phys. Chem.93 (1989) 388.

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. Venkateswaran, M. Barnabas, Z. Wu, J. M. Stadlbauer, B. W. Ng and D. C. Walker, Chem. Phys.137 (1989) 239.

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Venkateswaran, M. V. Barnabas and D. C. Walker, J. Phys. Chem.94 (1990) 178.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Roduner,The Positive Muon as a Probe in Free Radical Chemistry, Springer Series in Chemical Physics No.49 (1988) 58.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stadlbauer, J.M., Venkateswaran, K., Porter, G.B. et al. Competition between benzene and styrene in forming radicals under different solvent conditions observed by muon level crossing resonance. Hyperfine Interact 87, 877–882 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02068478

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02068478

Keywords

Navigation