Advertisement

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 224–226 | Cite as

Island flap anoplasty for treatment of transsphincteric fistula-in-ano

  • Alberto Del Pino
  • Richard L. Nelson
  • Russell K. Pearl
  • Herand Abcarian
Technical Notes
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of fistula-in-ano often replaces one problem, risk of persistent anal sepsis, with another, either incontinence after fistulotomy or mucosal ectropion after rectal flap advancement. A new technique for treatment of transsphincteric fistulas is described that could eliminate risk of both complications. TECHNIQUE: Island flap anoplasty, previously used in management of anal strictures or ectropion, is modified to treat transsphincteric fistulas. RESULTS: The operation has been performed in 11 patients, 3 of whom had Crohn's disease. Follow-up varied from one to ten months. Early recurrences have occurred in three patients, two with Crohn's disease and one without. Remaining patients have done well. CONCLUSION: This procedure is technically easy to perform and appears to cure transsphincteric fistulas while preserving anal sphincter. In the event of persistence of fistula, other operative options are not eliminated by this procedure. We feel that further experience and longer follow-up is needed to define precise indications for this procedure and to determine if continence is improved more so than with standard fistulotomy.

Key words

Transsphincteric fistula Island flap anoplasty Surgical technique 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pearl RK, Hooks VH III, Abcarian H, Orsay CP, Nelson RL. Island flap anoplasty for the treatment of anal stricture and mucosal ectropion. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:581–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Tets WF, Kuijpers HC. Continence disorders after anal fistulotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1194–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sainio P. A manometric study of anorectal function after surgery for anal fistula, with special reference to incontinence. Acta Chir Scand 1985;151:696–700.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lunniss PJ, Kamm MA, Phillips RK. Factors affecting continence after surgery for anal fistula. Br J Surg 1994;81:1382–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pearl RK, Andrews JR, Orsay CP. Role of the seton in the management of anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:573–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramanujam RS, Prasad ML, Abcarian H. The role of the seton in fistulotomy of the anus. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1983;157:419–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williams JG, Macloed CA, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Seton treatment of high anal fistula. Br J Surg 1991;78:1159–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Christensen A, Nilas L, Christiansen J. Treatment of transsphincteric anal fistula by the seton technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:454–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wedell J, Meier zu Eissen P, Banzhaf G, Kleine L. Sliding flap advancement for the treatment of high level fistulae. Br J Surg 1987;74:390–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Del Pino
    • 1
  • Richard L. Nelson
    • 1
  • Russell K. Pearl
    • 1
  • Herand Abcarian
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Colon & Rectal SurgeryCook County Hospital and The University of IllinoisChicago

Personalised recommendations