Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 30–36 | Cite as

On sex allocation and selfing in higher plants

  • Eric L. Charnov
Papers

Summary

Sex allocation (male allocation/female allocation) as a function of selfing rate is studied in the wild riceOryza perennis. Using dry weight measures, the male/female ratio is linearly related to the selfing rate. This linear relationship may have a fairly radical interpretation in terms of current sex allocation theory. It suggests that the intermediate selfing rates are themselves maintained by a form of frequency dependence. In particular, the linearity suggests: (i) the relative fitness of a selfed versus outcrossed offspring decreases with increased selfing; (ii) in equilibrium, a selfed offspring is approximately half as fit as an outcrossed offspring; (iii) the frequency dependence, being the opposite of that proposed in most selfing models, may result from the same forces thought to be involved in the maintenance of sex itself, and (iv) the position of the fitted line contains information about the plant's use of wind pollination for male reproduction. It suggests that wind shows much less mixing of pollen than previously assumed, and/or that there are severe morphological constraints on pollen presentation. The above interpretations are clearly speculative and tentative. Possible problems in the analysis, and some alternatives for data interpretation are discussed.

Keywords

Plant breeding systems sexual reproduction mixed ESS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aide, M. (1986) The influence of wind and animal pollination on variation in outcrossing rates.Evolution 40, 434–5.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, G. (1982)The Masterpiece of Nature. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Bertin, R.I. (1987) Paternity in plants, inReproductive Strategies of Plants (Lovett Doust, J. and Lovett Doust, L., eds.) Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Charlesworth, D. and Charlesworth, B. (1981) Allocation of resources to male and female functions in hermaphrodites,Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 15, 57–74.Google Scholar
  5. Charnov, E.L. (1979a) The genetical evolution of patterns of sexuality: Darwinian fitness.American Naturalist 113, 465–80.Google Scholar
  6. Charnov, E.L. (1979b) Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 76, 2480–4.Google Scholar
  7. Charnov, E.L. (1980) Sex allocation and local mate competition in barnacles.Marine Biology Letters 1, 269–72.Google Scholar
  8. Charnov, E.L. (1982)The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Charnov, E.L. (1986) An optimization principle for sex allocation in a temporally varying environment.Heredity 56, 119–21.Google Scholar
  10. Charnov, E.L. and Bull, J.J. (1986) Sex allocation, pollinator attraction and fruit dispersal in cosexual plants.Journal of Theoretical Biology 118, 321–5.Google Scholar
  11. Charnov, E.L., Maynard Smith, J. and Bull, J.J. (1976) Why be an hermaphrodite?Nature 263, 125–6.Google Scholar
  12. Cruden, R.W. and Lyon, D.L. (1985) Patterns of biomass allocation to male and female functions in plants with different mating systems.Oecologia 66, 299–306.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, R.A. (1930)The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (reprint 1958). Dover, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Geber, M.A. and Charnov, E.L. (1986) Sex allocation in hermaphrodites with partial overlap in male/female resource inputs.Journal of Theoretical Biology 118, 33–43.Google Scholar
  15. Holsinger, K.E. (1986) Dispersal and plant mating systems: the evolution of self-fertilization in subdivided populations.Evolution 40, 405–13.Google Scholar
  16. Jain, S.K. (1976) The evolution of inbreeding in plants.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 7, 469–95.Google Scholar
  17. Lande, R. and Schemske, D.W. (1985) The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models.Evolution 39, 24–40.Google Scholar
  18. Lemen, C. (1980) Allocation of reproductive effort to the male and female strategies in wind pollinated plants.Oecologia 45, 156–9.Google Scholar
  19. Lloyd, D.G. (1979) Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants.American Naturalist 113, 67–79.Google Scholar
  20. Lloyd, D.G. (1984) Gender allocations in outcrossing cosexual plants.Perspectives on Plant Population Biology (R. Dirzo and J. Sarukhán, eds.) pp. 277–303. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachussetts.Google Scholar
  21. Lovett Doust, J. and Cavers, P.B. (1982) Biomass allocation in hermaphrodite flowers.Canadian Journal of Botany 60, 2530–4.Google Scholar
  22. Maynard Smith, J. (1978)The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Maynard Smith, J. (1982)Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  24. Morishima, H., Hinata, K. and Oka, H.I. (1963) Comparison of modes of evolution of cultivated forms from two wild rice species,Oryza breviligulata andO. perennis. Evolution 17, 170–81.Google Scholar
  25. Morishima, H., Sano, Y. and Oka, H.I. (1984) Differentiation of perennial and annual types due to habitat conditions in the wild riceOryza perennis.Plant Systematics and Evolution 144, 119–35.Google Scholar
  26. Oka, H.I. (1983) Life-history characteristics and colonizing success in plants.American Zoologist 23, 99–109.Google Scholar
  27. Oka, H.I. and Chang, W.T. (1961) Hybrid swarms between wild and cultivated rice species.Oryza perennis andO. sativa. Evolution 15, 418–30.Google Scholar
  28. Oka, H.I. and Morishima, H. (1967) Variations in the breeding systems of a wild rice,Oryza perennis.Evolution 21, 249–58.Google Scholar
  29. Oka, H.I. and Sano, Y. (1981) Differentiation ofOryza perennis in adaptive strategy.Problems in General Genetics (Proceedings of the XIV ICG) II (1), (Y.P. Altukhov, ed.) pp. 65–85. MIR Publications, Moscow, USSR.Google Scholar
  30. Quellar, D.C. (1984) Pollen-ovule ratios and hermaphrodite sexual allocation strategies.Evolution 38, 1148–51.Google Scholar
  31. Ricker, W.E. (1973) Linear regressions in fishery research.Journal of the Fishery Research Board of Canada 30, 409–34.Google Scholar
  32. Sano, Y. and Morishima, H. (1982) Variations in resource allocation and adaptive strategy of a wild rice,Oryza perennis.Botanical Gazette 143, 518–23.Google Scholar
  33. Schemske, D.W. and Lande, R. (1985) The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. II. Empirical observations.Evolution 39, 41–52.Google Scholar
  34. Schoen, D.J. (1982) Male reproductive effort and breeding system in an hermaphroditic plant.Oecologia 53, 255–7.Google Scholar
  35. Williams, G.C. (1975)Sex and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
  36. Willson, M.F. and Ruppel, K.P. (1984) Resource allocation and floral sex ratio inZizania aquatica.Canadian Journal of Botany 62, 799–805.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric L. Charnov
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations