Skip to main content
Log in

Results of the double stapling procedure in pelvic surgery

  • World Progress In Surgery
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The double stapling technique for rectal reconstruction after resection involves closing the lower rectal segment with a linear stapler and performing the anastomosis using a circular stapler across the linear staple row. The purpose of this report is to review the results of double stapling, present our experience, and draw conclusions from the material available. We have utilized the double stapling technique in 80 patients for primary anastomoses and in 11 patients for secondary anastomoses following Hartmann procedures. Twenty-one anastomoses were at or near the dentate line. Fifty-six patients had rectal carcinoma, 29 patients had diverticulitis, 3 patients had carcinoma of the ovary, and 1 patient each had traumatic rectal perforation, volvulus, or rectal prolapse. Complications in the total 91 patients included 3 anastomotic leaks (3.3%), 1 postoperative hemoperitoneum (1.1%), and 3 strictures (3.3%). No anastomosis was protected by diverting colostomy. There were no operative deaths. Of 43 patients with cancer available for follow-up, 4 patients have developed local recurrence. The technique has been modified for ileoanal anastomosis during abdominal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis and early results are favorable. The double stapling technique provides a safe method for rectal reconstruction at or near the dentate line and offers the following advantages over other stapler techniques: (1) It eliminates the frustrating distal pursestring; (2) The rectal segment is not opened, minimizing contamination; and (3) It avoids gathering the sometimes generous circumference of the rectum on a pursestring thus allowing a more precise distal donut.

Résumé

La technique de double agrafage pour anastomose colorectale consiste en la fermeture du moignon rectal par une pince à agrafage linéaire suivie ensuite d'une anastomose par une pince à agrafage circulaire à travers la ligne d'agraphes du moignon. Le but de cet article est, d'après notre expérience avec cette technique, de revoir les résultats à distance et de tirer des conclusions sur le matériel autuellement disponible. Nous avons utilisé technique dans 80 cas d'anastomose primaire et dans 11 anastomoses secondaires lors du rétablissement de continuité après opération de Hartmann. Vingt et une de ces anastomoses étaient faites au niveau de la ligne pectinée. Cinquante-six patients avaient un cancer rectal, 29 avaient eu une diverticulose, 3, un cancer de l'ovaire alors qu'un malade avait une perforation traumatique, un autre, un volvulus, et un troisième, un prolapsus du rectum. Il y a eu très peu de complications chez ces 91 patients: 3 fuites anastomotiques (3.3%), un hémopéritoine post-opératoire (1.1%), et trois sténoses (3.3%). Il n'y a jamais, été pratiqué de colostomie de protection. La mortalité était nulle. Des 43 patients avec cancer suivis jusqu'à présent, 4 ont présenté une récidive locale. La technique a été modifiée pour la réalisation de l'anastomose iléoanale après coloproctectomie pour rectocolite ou polypose familiale: les résultats initiaux sont encourageants. La technique de double agrafage est une méthode de reconstruction sûre pour les anastomoses à proximité de ou au niveau de la ligne pectinée. Cette technique offre des avantages par rapport à d'autres techniques d'agrafage: 1) le problème frustrant de la confection d'une bourse distale est éliminé; 2) le moignon rectal n'est pas ouvert, minimisant la contamination; 3) on évite de froisser de tissu rectal, parfois un peu abondant par rapport au diamètre de segment abaissé, ce qui permet alors une anastomose congruente.

Resumen

La técnica de doble grapado para la reconstrucción del recto luego de una resección implica el cierre del segmento distal con un grapador lineal y la constructión de la anastomosis mediante el uso de un grapador circular. El propósito de este informe es revisar los resultados con el uso del grapador doble, presentar nuestra experiencia y derivar conclusiones a partir del material estudiado. Hemos utilizado la tecnica de doble grapado en 80 anastomosis primarias y en 11 secundarias después de un procedimiento de Hartmann. Veinituna anastomosis quedaron ubicadas en la línea dentada, o muy cerca de ella. Cincuenta y seis pacientes tenían carcinoma rectal, 29 diverticulitis, 3 carcinoma del ovario, 1 perforación traumática del recto, 1 volvulos y 1 prolapso rectal. Las complicaciones observadas en el grupo combinado de 91 casos incluyeron 3 fugas anastomóticas (3.3%), 1 hemoperitoneo postoperatorio (1.1%) y 3 estrecheces. Ninguna anastomosis fue protegida con colostomía proximal. No hubo muertes postoperatorias. De 43 pacientes con cáncer disponibles para seguimiento, 4 desarrollaron recurrencia local. La técnica ha sido modificada para efectuar una anastomosis ileoanal en el curso de una protocolectomía abdominal restaurativa por colitis ulcerativa y poliposis familiar y los resultados tempranos aparecen favorables. La técnica de doble grapado representa un método seguro de reconstrucción rectal al nivel de o cerca de la línea dentada, y ofrece la siguientes ventajas sobre otras técnicas de grapado 1) elimina la frustrante jareta distal. 2) No se abre el segmento distal del recto, con lo cual se minimiza la contamización. 3) Evita la reducción de la frecuentemente generosa circuferencia del recto en una jareta, con lo cual se logra un “donut” distal más preciso.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knight, C.D., Griffen, F.D.: An improved technique for low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapler. Surgery88:710, 1980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ravitch, M.M., Steichen, F.M.: A stapling instrument for end-to-end inverting anastomosis in the gastro-intestinal tract. Ann. Surg.189:791, 1979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Griffen, F.D., Knight, C.D. Sr., Whitaker, J.M., Knight, C.D. Jr.: The double stapling technique for low anterior resection, results, modifications, and observations. Ann. Surg.211:745, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Feinberg, S. M., Parker, F., Cohen, Z., Jamieson, C.G., Myers, E.D., Railton, R.H., Langer, B., Stern, H.S., Mc Leod, R.S.: The double stapling technique for low anterior resection of rectal carcinoma. Dis. Colon Rectum29:885, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ollier, J.Cl., Gavioli-Ferrari, M., Adloff, M.: Abdominal side-to-end colo-rectal anastomosis with circular stapling instruments. In Current Practice of Surgical Stapling, M.M. Ravitch, F.M. Steichen, R. Welter, editors, Philadelphia-London, Lea & Febiger, 1991, pp. 289–294

    Google Scholar 

  6. Picciocchi, A., D'ugo, D.M., Duurastante, V., Cardillo, G.: Double stapling technique for low colorectal anastomoses after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Int. Surg.73:19, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Varma, J.S., Chan, A.C.W., Li, M.K.W., Li, A.K.C.: Low anterior resection of the rectum using a double stapling technique. Br. J. Surg.77:888, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosen, C.B., Beart, R.W., Ilstrup, D.M.: Local recurrence of rectal carcinoma after hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses. Dis. Colon Rectum28:305, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ohman, U.: Curative potential of EEA stapler in rectal carcinoma. Acta Chir. Scand.152:59, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Colombo, P.L., Foglieni, C.L.S., Morone, C.: Analysis of recurrence following curative anterior resection and stapled anastomoses for carcinoma of the middle third and lower rectum. Dis. Colon Rectum30:457, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  11. Belli, L., Beati, C.A., Frangi, M., Aseni, P., Rondinara, G.F.: Outcome of patients with rectal cancer treated by stapled anterior resection. Br. J. Surg.75:422, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderberg, B., Enblad, P., Sjodahl, R., Wetterfors, J.: Recurrent rectal carcinoma after anterior resection and rectal stapling. Br. J. Surg.70:1, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hurst, P.A., Prout, W.G., Kelly, J.M., Bannister, J.J., Walker, R.T.: Local recurrence after low anterior resection using the staple gun. Br. J. Surg.69:275, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Knudsen, J.B., Nilsson, T., Sprechler, M., Johansen, A., Christensen, N.: Venous and nerve invasion as prognostic factors in postoperative survival of patients with resectable carcinoma of the rectum. Dis. Colon Rectum26:613, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Heald, R.J., Husband, E.M., Ryall, R.O.H.: The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery-the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br. J. Surg.69:613, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Illuminati, G., Bezzi, M., Martinelli, V.: Stapled coloanal anastomosis after linear closure of everted anorectal stump. Acta Chir. Scand.156:641, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Griffen, F.D., Knight, C.D.: Stapling technique for primary and secondary rectal anastomoses. Surg. Clin. North Am.64:579, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Caracciolo, F., Castrucci, G., Castigioni, G.C.: Anastomosis with EEATM Stapler following Hartmann procedure. Dis. Colon Rectum29:67, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lucarini, L., Barigazzi, A., Sciandra, C., Iannucci, P.: Restoration of continuity of the large intestine with the Premium CEEA Stapler: A new aseptic method. Acta Chir. Scand.156:633, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mittal, V.K., Cortez, J.A.: Hartmann procedure reconstruction with EEA Stapler. Dis. Colon Rectum1:215, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pietropaolo, V., Errara, M.M., Montori, A.: Endoscopic dilation of colonic postoperative strictures. Surg. Endosc.4:26, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnston, D., Holdsworth, P.J., Nasmyth, D.G., Neal, D.E., Primrose, J.N., Womack, N., Axon, A.T.R.: Preservation of the entire anal canal in conservative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: A pilot study comparing end-to-end ileo-anal anastomosis without mucosal resection with mucosal proctectomy and endoanal anastomosis. Br. J. Surg.74:940, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kmiot, W.A., Keighley, M.R.B.: Totally stapled abdominal restorative proctocolectomy. Br. J. Surg.76:961, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Williams, N.S., Marzouk, D.E.M.M., Hallan, R.I., Waldron, D.J.: Function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Br. J. Surg.76:1168, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sugarman, H.J., Newsome, H.H., DeCosta, G., Zfass, A.M.: Stapled ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis without a temporary diverting ileostomy. Ann. Surg. (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dean Griffen, F., Knight, C.D. & Knight, C.D. Results of the double stapling procedure in pelvic surgery. World J. Surg. 16, 866–871 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02066983

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02066983

Keywords

Navigation