Mathematical Geology

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 791–810 | Cite as

A statistical adjustment of Haldorsen's conditioned Boolean simulation algorithm

  • Roderik J. Berkhout
  • Antonio G. Chessa
  • Allard W. Martinius
Article

Abstract

This paper presents a new simulation algorithm for generating realizations of a Boolean model for sandstone reservoirs conditional on sandstone body intersections in wells. It is a statistically corrected version of the conditional simulation algorithm originally proposed by Haldorsen. In previous work it was shown that the conventional algorithm does not reproduce the correct statistics for sandstone body size at the well locations. The simulation of a Boolean model, given grain intersections on line transects, must be in accordance with the conditional distribution of the model, which implies that sandstone bodies intersected by wells and sandstone bodies in the interwell area should be simulated independently. Based on the conditional distribution a simulation algorithm is developed, which is compared to Haldorsen's algorithm by simulating an outcrop section of fluvial sandstone deposits. Simulations are conditioned on data of two fictitious wells. It turns out that the adjusted algorithm gives better results for the sand fraction that is connected to a set of wells, and also for the sand fraction that would be connected to an infill well.

Key words

point process germ-grain model waiting-time paradox conditional distribution conditional simulation volume fraction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Augedal, H. O., Omre, H., and Stanley, K. O., 1986,sisabosa — A program for stochastic modelling and evaluation of reservoir geology: Rept.sand 18/86 presented at Conf. Reservoir Description and Simulation with Emphasis on EOR (Oslo) 18 p.Google Scholar
  2. Berkhout, R. J., 1993, An adjustment of Haldorsen's object-based conditional simulation algorithm: unpubl. masters thesis, Faculty of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, Delft, 61 p.Google Scholar
  3. Brice, J. C., 1974, Evolution of meander loops: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 85, no. 4, p. 581–586.Google Scholar
  4. Chessa, A. G., 1992, On the object-based method for simulating sandstone deposits,in Christie, M. A., and others, eds., Proc. 3rd European Conf. Mathematics of Oil Recovery: Delft Univ. Press, Delft, p. 67–77.Google Scholar
  5. Chessa, A. G., 1995, Conditional simulation of spatial stochastic models for reservoir heterogeneity: doctoral dissertation, Delft Univ. Press, Delft. 177 p.Google Scholar
  6. Chessa, A. G., and Meester, L. E., 1996, Conditional distributions of Poisson processes given samples of induced point processes: submitted for publication to Adv. Appl. Prob.Google Scholar
  7. Damsleth, E., Tjølsen, C. B., Omre, H., and Haldorsen, H. H., 1992, A two-stage stochastic model applied to a North Sea reservoir: Jour. Petroleum Technology, v. 44, no. 4. p. 402–408, 486.Google Scholar
  8. Davies, T. R. H., and Tinker, C. C., 1984, Fundamental characteristics of stream meanders: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 95, no. 5, p. 505–512.Google Scholar
  9. Díaz-Molina, M., 1993, Geometry and lateral accretion patterns in meander loops: examples from the upper Oligocene—lower Miocene, Loranca Basin, Spain,in Marzo, M., and Puigdefábregas, C., eds., Alluvial sedimentation: Intern. Assoc. Sedim., Spec. Publ, v. 17, p. 115–132.Google Scholar
  10. Díaz-Molina, M., Arribas-Mocoroa, J., and Bustillo-Revuelta, A., 1989, The Tórtola and Villalba de la Sierra fluvial fans: Late Oligocene—early Miocene, Loranca Basin, central Spain: 4th Intern. Conf. Fluvial Sedimentology (Barcelona, Spain) Excursion Guidebook, v. 7, 74 p.Google Scholar
  11. Ethridge, F. G., and Schumm, S. A., 1978, Reconstructing palaeochannel morphologic and flow characteristics: methodology, limitations and assessment,in Miall, A. D., ed., Fluvial sedimentology: Can. Soc. Petrol. Geology Mem., v. 5, p. 703–722.Google Scholar
  12. Gómez, J. J., Díaz-Molina, M., and Lendinez, A., 1995, Tectono-sedimentary analysis of the Loranca Basin (Upper Oligocene-Miocene, central Spain). A “non-sequenced” foreland basin.in Friend, P., and Dabrio, C., eds., Tertiary basins of Spain: Cambridge Univ. Press. in press.Google Scholar
  13. Grimmett, G. R., and Stirzaker, D. R., 1982. Probability and random processes: Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 354 p.Google Scholar
  14. Gundesø, R., and Egeland, O., 1990,Sesimira—A new geological tool for 3-D modeling of heterogeneous reservoirs,in Butler, A. T., and others, eds., North Sea oil and gas reservoirs II: Graham and Trotman Ltd., London, p. 363–371.Google Scholar
  15. Haldorsen, H. H., 1983, Reservoir characterization procedures for numerical simulation: unpubl. doctoral dissertation, Univ. Texas, Austin, 556 p.Google Scholar
  16. Haldorsen, H. H., and Lake, L. W., 1984, A new approach to shale management in field-scale models: SPE Jour., v. 24, no. 8, p. 447–452.Google Scholar
  17. Haldorsen, H. H., and MacDonald, C. J., 1987, Stochastic modeling of underground reservoir facies (smurf): SPE Paper 16751, in Proc. 62nd SPE Annual Technical Conf. and Exhibition (Dallas), p. 99–113.Google Scholar
  18. Hall, P., 1988, Introduction to the theory of coverage processes: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 408 p.Google Scholar
  19. Hicking, E. J., 1974, Development of meanders in natural river channels: Am. Jour. Sci., v. 274, no. 4, p. 414–442.Google Scholar
  20. Hjort, N. L., and Omre, H., 1994, Topics in spatial statistics: Scand. Jour. Statist., v. 21, no. 4, p. 289–357 (with discussion and a reply by the authors).Google Scholar
  21. Martinius, A. W., 1996. Controls on the long-term development of the Tórtola fluvial system and its large-scale architecture (upper Oligocene, Loranca Basin, central Spain): submitted for publication to Jour. Sediment. Research, Sect. B.Google Scholar
  22. Matheron, G., 1967, Eléments pour une théorie des milieux poreux: Masson, Paris, 164 p.Google Scholar
  23. Matheron, G., 1975, Random sets and integral geometry: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 261 p.Google Scholar
  24. Mijnssen, F. C. J., 1991, Characterization of deltaic rocks for numerical reservoir simulation: unpubl. doctoral dissertation, TNO Institute of Applied Geoscience, Delft, 223 p.Google Scholar
  25. Stoyan, D., Kendall, W. S., and Mecke, J., 1987, Stochastic geometry and its applications: John Wiley & Sons/Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 345 p.Google Scholar
  26. Weber, K. J., and van Geuns, L. C., 1989, Framework for constructing clastic reservoir simulation models: SPE paper 19582, in Proc. 64th SPE Annual Technical Conf and Exhibition (San Antonio), p. 109–118.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roderik J. Berkhout
    • 1
  • Antonio G. Chessa
    • 2
    • 3
  • Allard W. Martinius
    • 3
  1. 1.Shell U.K. Expro, Brent Field Unit DB/731, Seafield House, Hill of RubislawAberdeenScotland
  2. 2.Faculty of Mathematics and InformaticsDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Faculty of Mining and Petroleum EngineeringDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations