Skip to main content
Log in

Probability field for the post-processing of stochastic simulations

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A combination of factorial kriging and probability field simulation is proposed to correct realizations resulting from any simulation algorithm for either too high nugget effect (noise) or poor histogram reproduction. First, a factorial kriging is done to filter out the noise from the noisy realization. Second, the uniform scores of the filtered realization are used as probability field to sample the local probability distributions conditional to the same dataset used to generate the original realization. This second step allows to restore the data variance. The result is a corrected realization which reproduces better target variogram and histogram models, yet honoring the conditioning data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeida, S. A., and Journel, A. G., 1994, Joint simulation of multiple variables with a markovtype coregionalization model: Math. Geology, v. 26, no. 5, p. 565–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgault, G., 1994, Robustness of noise filtering by factorial kriging: Math. Geology, v. 26, no. 6, p. 733–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgault, G., and Journel, A. G., 1994, Gaussian or indicator-based simulations? Which variogram is more relevant?in Chung C. F., ed., IAMG '94 Annual Meeting, Mont-Tremblant (Québec, Canada), p. 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, C., Jeulin, D., and Lajaunie, C., 1989, Application of multivariate kriging to the processing of noisy images,in Armstrong, M., ed., Geostatistics, v. 2, Quantitative geology and geostatistics: 3rd Intern. Geostatistics Congress (Avignon, France), Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrect. The Netherlands, p. 749–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, C. V., and Journel, A. G., 1992, GSLIB Geostatistical Software Library and user's guide: Oxford Press, Oxford, 340 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froidevaux, R., 1992, Probability field simulation,in Soares, A., ed., Geostatistics Troia '92. Quantitative geology and geostatistics, v. I: Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrect, The Netherlands, p. 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel, A. G., and Xu, W., 1995, Posterior identification of histograms conditional to local data: Math. Geology, v. 26, no. 3, p. 323–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y. Z., and Royer, J. J., 1988, Local geostatistical filtering application to remote sensing: Sciences de la Terre, Série Informatique (Nancy), v. 27, p. 17–36.

  • Marcotte, D., 1995, Conditional simulation with data subject to measurement erior: Post-stimulation filtering with modified factorial kriging: Math. Geology, v. 27, no. 6, p. 749–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron, G., 1982. Pour une analyse krigeante des données régionalisées: Publ. N-732. Centre de Géostatistique et de Morphologie Mathématique, École des Mines de Paris. Fontainebleau, 22 p.

  • Sandjivy, L., 1984, The factorial kriging analysis of regionalized data. Its application to geochemical prospecting,in Verly, G., and others, eds., Geostatistics for natural resources characterization: NATO-ASI, Serie C, v. 122, pt. 1, p. 559–572.

  • Srivastava, R. M., 1992. Reservoir characterization with probability field simulation: SPE Paper No. 24753, preprint.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bourgault, G. Probability field for the post-processing of stochastic simulations. Math Geol 28, 723–734 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02066342

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02066342

Key words

Navigation