Abstract
Mathematical models and their targets are considered. The results provide an explanation why the shape of the density distribution function is dependent upon both size of the geological object and number of observations. These results have importance both for preparative and interpretative phases of prospecting.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chetverikov, L. I., 1977, O geneticheskoi intepretacii funkcii raspredelenija soderzhaniya khimicheskikh elementov v porodach i rudach: Proceedings of symposium “Hornická Příbram ve vědě a technice”, v. 1, p. 178–184, Příbram.
Govett, G. J. S., 1983, Handbook of Exploration Geochemistry: Statistics and Data Analysis in Geochemical Prospecting, v. 2, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 437 p.
Sharapov, I. P., 1977, Sistemnyj podkhod k matematizacii geologii: Proceedings of symposium “Hornická Příbram ve vědě a technice”, v. 3, p. 933–958, Příbram.
Swoboda, H., 1977. Moderní Statistika, Svoboda, Praha, 351 p.
Rodionov, A. A., 1981, Statisticheskie resheniya v geologii: Nedra, Moskva, 230 p.
Zabrodin, V. J., Kulyndyšev, V. A., and Solovev, V. A., 1977, Hierarkhija geologicheskikh obyektov i problema matematizacii: Proceedings of symposium “Hornická Příbram ve vědě a technice,” v. 3, p. 822–835, Příbram.
Zhivetěv, V. K., Zabrodin, V. J., Kulyndyšev, V. A., 1977, Metodologiya veroyatnostno-statisticheskikh metodov: Proceedings of symposium “Hornická Příbram ve vědě a technice,” v. 3, p. 838–861, Příbram.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Žáček, M., Křivánek, Z. Reality of the relation between geological objects and mathematical models. Math Geol 23, 41–46 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02065964
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02065964