Skip to main content
Log in

A reply to arguments against a spur model for muonium formation

  • Published:
Hyperfine Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A clear distinction is made between the spur model for muonium formation in condensed matter and the alternative hot model. Arguments against the spur model are considered and found lacking. Some new data is presented for aqueous systems: the initial diamagnetic fraction increases with OH concentration, and unequivocal muonium inhibition is demonstrated for HClO4 solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P.W. Percival, E. Roduner, and H. Fischer, Chem. Phys.32 (1978) 353

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.H. Brewer, K.M. Crowe, F.N. Gygax, and A. Schenck, in: Muon Physics, Vol. 3, Chemistry and solids, ed. V.W. Hughes and C.S. Wu (Academic Press, New York, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  3. D.G. Fleming, D.M. Garner, L.C. Vaz, D.C. Walker, J.H. Brewer, and K.M. Crowe, in: Positronium and muonium chemistry, ed. H.J. Ache, Adv. in Chem. Ser.175 (1979) 279

  4. D.C. Walker, Y.C. Jean, and D.G. Fleming, J. Chem. Phys.70 (1979) 4534; and72 (1980) 2902

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.W. Percival, J. Chem. Phys.72 (1980) 2901

    Google Scholar 

  6. D.C. Walker, Hyperfine Interactions8 (1981) 329

    Google Scholar 

  7. P.W. Percival, J.C. Brodovitch, and K.E. Newman, Chem. Phys. Lett.91 (1982) 1

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Ito, B.W. Ng. Y.C. Jean, and D.C. Walker, Can. J. Chem.58 (1980) 2395

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Ito, B.W. Ng, Y.C. Jean, and D.C. Walker, Hyperfine Interactions8 (1981) 355

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y.C. Jean, B.W. Ng, J.H. Brewer, D.G. Fleming, and D.C. Walker, J. Phys. Chem.85 (1981) 451

    Google Scholar 

  11. Y.C. Jean, B.W. Ng, J.M. Stadlbauer, and D.C. Walker, J. Chem. Phys.75 (1981) 2879

    Google Scholar 

  12. D.G. Fleming, R.J. Mikula, and D.M. Garner, Phys. Rev.A26 (1982) 2527

    Google Scholar 

  13. O.E. Mogensen, J. Chem. Phys.60 (1974) 998

    Google Scholar 

  14. G.A. Kenney-Wallace and C.D. Jonah, J. Phys. Chem.86 (1982) 2572

    Google Scholar 

  15. P.W. Percival, Hyperfine Interactions6 (1979) 373

    Google Scholar 

  16. P.R. Crippa, A. Vecli, G. Guidi, C. Bucci, G.M. De'Munari, P. Podini, and R. Tedeschi, Radiat. Eff.38 (1978) 249

    Google Scholar 

  17. P.W. Percival, E. Roduner, H. Fischer, M. Camani, F. Gygax, and A. Schenck, Chem. Phys. Lett.47 (1977) 11

    Google Scholar 

  18. K.Y. Lam and J.W. Hunt, Int. J. Radiat. Phys. Chem.7 (1975) 317

    Google Scholar 

  19. P.W. Percival, Hyperfine Interactions8 (1981) 315

    Google Scholar 

  20. C.D. Jonah, J.Ch. Abbé, G. Duplâtre, and A. Haessler, Chem. Phys.58 (1981) 1

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Talamoni, J.Ch. Abbé, G. Duplâtre, and A. Haessler, Chem. Phys.58 (1981) 13

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Talamoni, J.Ch. Abbé, G. Duplâtre, and A. Haessler, Radiat. Phys. Chem.20 (1982) 275

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through an Intermediate Energy Physics Project Grant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Percival, P.W., Brodovitch, JC. & Newman, K.E. A reply to arguments against a spur model for muonium formation. Hyperfine Interact 18, 721–725 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02064892

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02064892

Keywords

Navigation