Skip to main content
Log in

European diversity in science and technology

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A clear understanding of the concept and consequences of diversity in science and technology is a key issue for Europe, when considering the current debate on cohesion Put forward within the Single European Act. According to Article 130B of the Single Act, all European policies, including technological policies must contribute to the achievement of a greater cohesion throughout the EC.

The European market is generally presented as mainly a patchwork of national or even regional characteristics, with compartmentalized niches, and specific regulations. But does cohesion mean decreasing disparities between regions, which in such case signifies a passive policy of reallocation of resources within the EC, at the risk of generating uniformity? Or, does cohesion mean integration of all innovative and creative efforts, which implies a more complex policy of stimulation, under the condition to maintain a certain diversity?

Must the governments systematically reduce diversity, or on the contrary must they enlarge diversity? How can they distinguish between negative and positive aspects of diversity? How do they operate a trade off between economies of scale and economies of diversity? To try to answer these political issues and to set up a coherent industrial policy at the EC level, a careful analysis of the sources of diversity, of the mechanisms that generate or reduce diversity, of the ways to valorize diversity are discussed in this paper

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amendola, M. and Gaffard, J.L. (1988). The innovation choice: an economic analysis of the dynamics of technology, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amendola, M. and alii (1990). L'automazione flessibile, Franco Angeli, Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. (1986). Horizontal versus Vertical Information Structure of the Firm, American Economic Review, 76, 971–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. (1988). Information, Incentives and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy, CUP.

  • Aoki, M. (1990). Toward an economic model of the japanese firm, Journal of Economic Literature, March.

  • Arthur, W.B. (1988). Competing technologies: an overview In Dosi and alii (eds) Technical change and Economic theory, London, Pintor.

  • Charbit, C., Gaffard, J.L., Longhi, C., Perrin, J.C., Quere, M. and Ravix, J.L. (1991) Local systems of innovation of Europe, Fast Occasional Paper n∞235, MUST Project, Vol. 11, May.

  • Cohendet, P., Ledoux, M.J. and Zuscovitch, E. (1987). Les materiaux nouveaux: dynamique economique et strategies europeennes, Economica, Paris, or New Materials, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohendet, P. and Llerena, P. (1987). Flexibilities, complexity and integration in production processes In Ergas H. (ed) Firm's environment interconnections in a changing productive system, Franco Angeli, Milano, 239–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohendet, P. and Llerena, P. (1989). Flexibilite, Information et Decision, Economica, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohendet, P. and Llerena P. (1991). Integration and learning process In Bourgine, C. and Walliser, B. (eds) Economics and Cognitive Sciences, Pergamon Press.

  • Cohendet, P., Llerena, P. and Sorge, A. (1991). Modes of usage and diffusion of new technology and new knowledge: the MUST Project — overall synthesis report, Fast Occasional Paper n∞227, MUST Project n∞2, CEE DG XII, May.

  • Cohendet, P., Llerena, P. and Sorge, A. (eds) (1994). Technological diversity and coherence in Europe: analytical framework and case studies, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. (1987). Some new standards for the economics of standardization in the information age In Dasgupta, P. and Stoneman, P. Economic Policy and Technological Performance, Cambridge University Press.

  • Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change, Research Policy.

  • Dosi, G. (1988). Institutions and markets in a dynamic world. The Manchester School, Vol. 56, n∞2, June, 119–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, Procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 26, September, 1120–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G. and Soete, L. (eds) (1988). Technical change and economic theory, Pinter Publishers.

  • Dosi, G., Pavitt, K. and Soete, L. (1990). The economics of technical change and international trade, Wheatsheaf, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. and Soete, L. (1988). Technical change and international trade In Dosi and alii (1988), chap. 9, 401–431.

  • Edquist, C. (1989). Empirical differences between OECD countries in he diffusion of new product and process technologies, Paper for the International Conference on Diffusion of Technologies and Social Behaviour, Laxenburg, 14–16 June.

  • Eyraud, F., D'Iribarne, A., Maurice, M. and Rychener F. (1986). Des entreprises en mutation dans la crise. Apprentissage des technologies flexibles et emergence de nouveaux acteurs, Aix-en-Provence, Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail, Research report.

  • Gaffard, J.L. (1990). Economie industrielle et de l'innovation, Dalloz.

  • Garnier, G. (1987). Worldwide and local technologies, FAST, October.

  • Gibbons, M. and Metcalfe, J.S. (1986). Technological variety and the process of competition, paper presented at the conference: Innovation Diffusion, Venise.

  • Hingel, A. (1990). Diversity, Equality and Community Cohesion, FAST, Brussels, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G.M. (1988). Economics and institutions: a manifesto for a modern Institutional Economics, Polity Press.

  • Jacobs, D. (1990). The Policy relevance of diffusion, Report for the Policy Studies Technology and Economy, Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs.

  • Kuznetz, S. (1930). Secular movements in production and prices, Boston, Houghton.

  • Llerena, D. and Llerena, P. (1993). Diversity and valorization of the electricity-generation technologies In The European Community Utilities Policy, July, 223–232.

  • Lundvall, B.A. (1985). Products innovation and user-producer interaction, Aalborg, Aalborg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurice, M. and Sorge, A. (1989). Dynamique industrielle et capacite d'innovation de l'industrie de la machine-outil en France et en RFA, Aix-en-Provence, Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail, document 89-1.

  • Maurice, M. and Sorge, A. (1990). The societal effect in strategies and competitiveness of machine-tool manufacturers in France and West Germany, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1, 141–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1984). Secoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory, Research Policy, December.

  • Porter, M.E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nation, New-York, The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saviotti, P. (1988). Information, variety and entropy in technoeconomic development, Research Policy, Vol. 17.

  • Sylverberg, G., Dosi, G. and Orsenigo, L. (1988). Innovation, diversity and diffusion: a self-organization model, Economic Journal Vol. 98, December, 1032–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorge, A. (1990). A european overview of work and vocational training In Warniz, M., Wobbe, W. and Brodner, P. (eds) New technology and manufacturing management, Chichester, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T.B. (1898). Why is economics not an evolutionary science?, Quarterly Journal of Economics Vol. 12, 373–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1975). Market and Hierarchies; Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New-York, The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohendet, P., Llerena, P. European diversity in science and technology. AI & Soc 8, 107–122 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02064276

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02064276

Keywords

Navigation