Skip to main content
Log in

Discriminant analysis of factors distinguishing patients with functional dyspepsia from patients with duodenal ulcer

Significance of somatization

  • Esophageal, Gastric, And Duodenal Disorders
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients with duodenal ulcer or functional dyspepsia do not differ on dyspeptic symptoms. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that functional dyspepsia and duodenal ulcer are two different diagnostic entities by examining the discriminating power of several anamnestic, biological, and psychosocial variables. Ninety-four patients with duodenal ulcer and 86 patients with functional dyspepsia were included. Anamnestic data, global assessment,Helicobacter pylori status, blood group, Lewisa+ phenotype, and several measures of psychological distress and somatic complaints were registered. Compared to patients with functional dyspepsia, the duodenal ulcer patients were more often infected byHelicobacter pylori and had their stomach discomfort more often relieved by eating. Compared to patients with duodenal ulcer, patients with functional dyspepsia had higher scores of depression, trait anxiety, general psychopathology and different somatic complaints (called somatization). They were also less satisfied with the health care system, their disorder had a greater negative impact on their quality of life, and their global assessment of own health was poorer. Discriminant analysis including age, smoking,Helicobacter pylori status, global assessment, and somatic complaint classified 86.1% of the patients correctly (77.9% of the patients with functional dyspepsia and 93.6% of the patients with duodenal ulcer). It is concluded that duodenal ulcer and functional dyspepsia are two separate diagnostic entities. Patients with duodenal ulcer are older, smoke more often, and almost all are infected withHelicobacter pylori, while patients with functional dyspepsia are characterized by somatization and a negative assessment of their own health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cederberg A, Varis K, Salmi HA, Sipponen P, Härkönen M, Sarna S: Young onset peptic ulcer disease and non-ulcer dyspepsia are separate entities. Scand J Gastroenterol 26(suppl 186):33–44, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goodwin CS, Worsley B: Peptic ulcer disease andHelicobacter pylori infection. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 8:122–127, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marshall BJ, Armstrong JA, McGechie DB, Glancy RJ: Attempts to fulfill Koch's postulates for pyloric campylobacter. Med J Aust 142:436–439, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tytgat GNJ, Graham DY, Lee A, Marshall BJ, Dixon MF, Axon ATR:Helicobacter pylori: Causal agent in peptic ulcer disease? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:103–104, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  5. Talley NJ, Fung LH, Gilligan IJ, McNeil D, Piper DW: Association of anxiety, neuroticism, and depression with dyspepsia of unknown cause. A case-control study. Gastroenterology 90:886–892, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Langeluddecke P, Goulston K, Tennant C: Psychological factors in dyspepsia of unknown cause: A comparison with peptic ulcer disease. J Psychosom Res 34:215–222, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bleijenberg G, Fennis JFM: Anamnestic and psychological features in diagnosis and prognosis of functional abdominal complaints: A prospective study. Gut 30:1076–1081, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Talley NJ, Phillips SF, Bruce B, Twomey CK, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ: Relation among personality and symptoms in nonulcer dyspepsia and the irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 99:327–333, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berstad A, Nesland Å: Erosive prepyloric changes (EPC)—a new entity. Scand J Gastroenterol 22(suppl 128):94–100, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karvonen A-L, Kekki M, Lehtola J, Sipponen P, Ihamäki T: Prepyloric erosions: An entity of its own among erosive gastric lesions. Scand J Gastroenterol 22:1095–1101, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hausken T, Svebak S, Wilhelmsen I, Tangen Haug T, Petterson E, Olavsen K, Hveem K, Berstad A: Low vagal tone and antral dysmotility in patients with functional dyspepsia. Psychosom Med 55:12–22, 1993

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hausken T, Berstad A: Wide gastric antrum in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia. Effect of cisapride. Scand J Gastroenterol 27:427–432, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tangen Haug T, Svebak S, Wilhelmsen I, Berstad A, Ursin H: Psychological factors and somatic symptoms in functional dyspepsia. A comparison with duodenal ulcer and healthy controls. J Psychosom Res 38:281–291, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nesland Å, Berstad A: Erosive prepyloric changes (EPC) in persons with and without dyspepsia. Scand J Gastroenterol 20:222–228, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilhelmsen I, Tangen Haug T, Berstad A, Ursin H: Increased relapse of duodenal ulcer in patients treated with cognitive psychotherapy. Lancet 336:307, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wilhelmsen I, Tangen Haug T, Ursin H, Berstad A: Effect of short term cognitive psychotherapy on recurrence of duodenal ulcer: A prospective randomised trial. Psychosom Med 56:440–448, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tangen Haug T, Wilhelmsen I, Svebak S, Berstad A, Ursin H: Psychotherapy in functional dyspepsia. J Psychosom Res 38:735–744, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Berstad K, Wilhelmsen I, Berstad A: Biometric evaluation of gastric urease activity in man. Scand J Gastroenterol 27:977–983, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Graham DY, Klein PD, Evans DJ, et al: Simple noninvasive method to test efficacy of drugs in the eradication ofHelicobacter pylori infection: The example of combined bismuth subsalicylate and nitrofurantoin. Am J Gastroenterol 86:1158–1162, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Veldheyzen van Zanten SJO, Tytgat KMAJ, Hollingswoth J, et al:14C-urea breath test for the detection ofHelicobacter pylori. Am J Gastroenterol 85:399–403, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sipponen P, Äärynen M, Kääriäinen I, Kettunen P, Helske T, Seppälä K: Chronic antral gastritis, Lewisa+ phenotype, and male sex as factors in predicting coexisting duodenal ulcer. Scand J Gastroenterol 24:581–588, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sipponen P, Lindgren J: Sialylated Lewis a determinant Ca 19-9 in benign and malignant gastric tissue. Acta Path Microbiol Scand Sect A 94:305–311, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  23. Åsberg M, Montgomery SA, Perris C, Schalling D, Sedvall G: The CPRS development and applications of a psychiatric rating scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 271:5–27, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Goldberg D, Williams P: A user's guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, NFER-Nelson, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  25. Eysenck HJ: The Structure of Human Personality. London, Mitchum, 1953

    Google Scholar 

  26. Beck AT, Mendelsohn SA, Mark J, Erbaugh J: An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 4:561–571, 1961

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Spielberger CD: Manual for the State-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, California, Consulting Psychologist Press, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  28. Derogatis LR, Lopez MC: PAIS and PAIS-SR. Administration. scoring and procedures manual. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  29. Derogatis LR: The Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale (PAIS). J Psychosom Res 30:77–91, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilhelmsen I, Bakke A, Tangen Haug T, Endresen IM, Berstad A: Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale (PAIS-SR) in a Norwegian material of patients with functional dyspepsia, duodenal ulcer and urinary bladder dysfunction. Clinical validation of the instrument. Scand J Gastroenterol 29:611–617, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Brahler E, Scheer J: Der Giessener Beschwerdebogen (GBB). Bern, Hans Huber, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nouris MJ: SPSS/PC+ Statistics 4.0. Chicago, SPSS Inc, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nyrèn O, Adami HO, Gustavsson S, Lööf L: Excess sicklisting in nonulcer dyspepsia. J Clin Gastroenterol 8:339–345, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lipowski ZJ. Somatization: A border land between medicine and psychiatry. Can Med Assoc J 135:609–614, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  35. Spitzer RL: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III). American Psychiatric Association, 1980

  36. Ursin H: Expectancy, activation and somatic health: A new psychosomatic theory.In Coping and Health. S Levine, H Ursin (eds). New York, Plenum Press, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tangen Haug T, Svebak S, Hausken T, Wilhelmsen I, Berstad A, Ursin H: Low vagal activity as mediating mechanism for the relationship between personality factors and gastric symptoms in functional dyspepsia. Psychosom Med 56:181–186, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Richter JE, Bradley LA, Castell DO: Eosophageal chest pain, current controversies in pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy. Ann Intern Med 110:66–78, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Emeran A, Raybould H: Role of visceral afferent mechanism in functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 99:1688–1704, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wilhelmsen I, Tangen Haug T, Sipponen P, Berstad A:Helicobacter pylori in functional dyspepsia and normal controls. Scand J Gastroenterol 29:522–527, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Berstad A, Alexander B, Weberg R, Serck-Hansen A, Holland S, Hirschowitz I: Antacids reduceCampylobacter pylori colonization without healing the gastritis in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia and erosive prepyloric changes. Gastroenterology 95:619–624, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nesland AA, Øktedalen O, Opstad PK, Serck-Hanssen A, Aase S, Berstad A: Erosive prepyloric changes—a manifestation of stress? Scand J Gastroenterol 24:522–528, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Weberg R, Berstad A: Low-dose antacids and pirenzepine in the treatment of patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia and erosive prepyloric changes. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 23:237–243, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Nyrèn O, Adami H-O, Bates S, Bergstrøm R, Gustavsson S, Lööf L, Nyberg A: Absence of therapeutic benefit from antacids or cimetidine in non-ulcer dyspepsia. N Engl J Med 314:339–343, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Alexander F: Psychosomatic Medicine: Its Principles and Applications. New York, WW Norton, 1950

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilhelmsen, I., Tangen Haug, T., Ursin, H. et al. Discriminant analysis of factors distinguishing patients with functional dyspepsia from patients with duodenal ulcer. Digest Dis Sci 40, 1105–1111 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02064207

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02064207

Key words

Navigation