Skip to main content
Log in

Cecum of guinea pig is a reservoir and sigmoid is a high-resistance conduit

  • Motility, Nerve-Gut Interactions, Hormones, And Receptors
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared the filling responses of the cecum and the sigmoid of the guinea pig using volumes up to 60 ml and 2.5 ml, respectively. In the isolated cecum, each 1-cm increment of hydrostatic pressure above zero led to accommodation of 10 ml volume; in the sigmoid, the yield pressure (at which accommodation first occurred) was 6 cm H2O, and pressure increments up to 20 cm H2O produced volume increments of less than 0.5 ml. Resting pressure at half-maximal filling was 5.0±0.7 cm H2O for the sigmoid and 1.7±0.6 cm H2O for the cecum. K+ depolarization led to a significant upward shift in the pressure curves of both segments. Ca2+ withdrawal decreased sigmoid and cecal pressures at some volumes. Distension of the cecum triggered intermittent contractions, which began with the shortening of the teniae and were associated with low-amplitude pressures and expulsion of a 5- to 10-ml volume. Distension of the sigmoid produced propagating contractions that were associated with high-amplitude pressures and lengthening; compartmentalization in the sigmoid prevented efflux from it, and volume inflow was not affected by pressure waves. Our observations indicate that its large capacity and great distensibility make the cecum suitable for reservoir functions, whereas its narrowness and lack of distensibility make the sigmoid a high-resistance conduit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schulze-Delrieu K, Wall JP: Mechanical activity of muscular patch pouches from cat and rabbit stomachs. Gastroenterology 88:1012–1019, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schulze-Delrieu K, Shirazi SS: Pressure and length adaptations in the isolated cat stomach. Am J Physiol 15:G92-G99, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  3. Christensen J: Motility of the colon.In Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract, Vol 2, 2nd ed. LR Johnson (ed). New York, Raven Press, 1987, pp 665–693

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ehrlein HJ, Reich H, Schwinger M: Colonic motility and transit of digesta during hard and soft feces formation in rabbits. J Physiol 338:75–86, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Huizinga JD, Daniel EE: Motor functions of the colon.In The Large Intestine: Physiology, Pathophysiology and Disease. SF Phillips, JH Pemberton, RG Shorter (eds). New York, Raven Press, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weems WA, Weisbrodt NW: Ileal and colonic propulsive behavior: Contribution of enteric neural circuits. Am J Physiol 250:G653-G659, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Elliott TR, Barclay-Smith E: Antiperistalsis and other muscular activities of the colon. J Physiol 31:272–304, 1904

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ritchie JA: Colonic motor activity and bowel function. I. Normal movement of contents. Gut 9:442–456, 1968

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarna SK: Physiology and pathophysiology of colonic motor activity. Part Two. Dig Dis Sci 36:998–1018, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gabella G: On the musculature of the gastrointestinal tract of the guinea-pig. Anat Embryol 163:135–156, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tucker HJ, Snape WJ Jr, Cohen S: Comparison of proximal and distal colonic muscle of the rabbit. Am J Physiol 237:E383–388, 1979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Snape WJ Jr, Kim BH, Willenbucher R, Koelbel C, Mayer EA, Walsh JH: The response of proximal and distal rabbit colonic muscle after electrical field stimulation. Gastroenterology 96:321–326, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Snape WJ Jr, Mayer EA, Koelbel CBM, Hyman PE, Williams R: Different response of smooth muscle from different regions of the human colon. J Gastrointest Motil 1:29–34, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  14. Snape WJ Jr, Crawford B, Hyman PE, Lechago J: Anatomic contribution to differences in rabbit colonic muscle contraction. Gastroenterology 100:75–81, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kerlin P, Zinsmeister A, Phillips S: Motor responses to food of the ileum, proximal colon and distal colon of healthy humans. Gastroenterology 84:762–770, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schulze-Delrieu K: Clearance Patterns of the isolated guinea pig duodenum. Gastroenterology 102:849–856, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Custer-Hagen T, Schulze-Delrieu K: Movement of haustra and of particles in the isolated guinea pig cecum. Clin Res 37:366A, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wade PR, Wood JD: Electrical behavior of myenteric neurons in guinea pig distal colon. Am J Physiol 254:G522-G530, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Neri M, Phillips S, Fich A: Measurement of tone in canine colon. Am J Physiol 260:G505-G511, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Steadman ChJ, Phillips SF, Camilleri M, Haddad AC, Hanson RB: Variation of muscle tone in the human colon. Gastroenterology 101:373–381, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Waldron DJ, Gill RC, Bowes KL: Pressure response of the human colon to intraluminal distension. Dig Dis Sci 34:1163–1167, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moreno-Osset E, Bazzochi G, Lo S, Trombley B, Ristow E, Reddy SN, Villaneueva-Meyer J, Fain JW, Jing J, Merian I, Snape WJ: Association between postprandial changes in colonic intraluminal pressure and transit. Gastroenterology 96:1265–1273, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krevsky B, Malmud LS, D'Ercole F, Maurer AH, Fischer RS: Colonic transit scintigraphy. A physiologic approach to the quantitative measurement of colonic transit in humans. Gastroenterology 91:1102–1112, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Proano M, Camilleri M, Phillips SF, Brown ML, Thomforde GM: Transit of solids through the human colon: Regional quantification in the unprepared bowel. Am J Physiol 258:G856-G862, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Costa M, Furness JB: The peristaltic reflex: An analysis of the nerve pathways and their pharmacology. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 294:47–60, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  26. Crema A, Frigo GM, Lecchini S: A pharmacological analysis of the peristaltic reflex in the isolated colon of the guinea-pig or cat. Br J Pharmacol 39:334–345, 1970

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu HS, Karakida T, Homma S:In vitro motor activity and compliance of the caecum in streptozotocin diabetic rats. Jpn J Physiol 40:843–851, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lange, W., Schulze-Delrieu, K., Lange, H. et al. Cecum of guinea pig is a reservoir and sigmoid is a high-resistance conduit. Digest Dis Sci 40, 1015–1023 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02064191

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02064191

Key words

Navigation