Advertisement

Hyperfine Interactions

, Volume 94, Issue 1, pp 2255–2259 | Cite as

Mössbauer studies of Al75Cu15−xFexV10 icosahedral alloys

  • Z. M. Stadnik
  • F. Müller
  • G. Stroink
  • M. Rosenberg
Amorphous Materials, Quasicrystals, and Nanocrystalline Materials
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

57Fe Mössbauer effect measurements have been performed at room temperature on the alloy series Al75Cu15−xFexV10 withx=0.15 (amorphous and icosahedral phases), 3 and 6 (icosahedral phases). There is more disorder in the icosahedral phase of thex=0.15 alloy than in its amorphous phase. The bimodal character of the distribution of quadrupole splittings becomes less pronounced with increasingx and disappears forx≥6. This is interpreted in terms of two classes of transition metal sites in Al-transition metal-based icosahedral alloys.

Keywords

Thin Film Amorphous Phase Effect Measurement Quadrupole Splitting Metal Site 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    S.J. Poon, Adv. Phys. 41(1992)303.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Z.M. Stadnik and G. Stroink, Phys. Rev. B47(1993)100Google Scholar
  3. [2]a
    F. Müller, M. Rosenberg, W. Liu and U. Köster, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 134(1991)900.Google Scholar
  4. [3]
    A.-P. Tsai, A. Inoue and T. Masumoto, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 26(1987)L1994; Proc. JIMIS5, Suppl. Trans. JIM 29(1988)521; Met. Trans. A19(1988)1369;Google Scholar
  5. [3]a
    E. Matsubara, Y. Waseda, A.P. Tsai, A. Inoue and T. Masumoto, Z. Naturforsch. (a) 43(1988)505Google Scholar
  6. [3]b
    A.P. Tsai, A. Inoue, Y. Bizen and T. Masumoto, Acta Metall. 37(1989)1443.Google Scholar
  7. [4]
    Z.M. Stadnik and F. Müller, to be published.Google Scholar
  8. [5]
    Z.M. Stadnik, these Proceedings, Hyp. Int.Google Scholar
  9. [6]
    G. Le Caër and J.M. Dubois, J. Phys. E12(1979)4908.Google Scholar
  10. [7]
    J. Hesse and A. Rübartsch, J. Phys. E7(1974)526.Google Scholar
  11. [8]
    Z.M. Stadnik and G. Stroink, Phys. Rev. B38(1988)10447.Google Scholar
  12. [9]
    N. Kataoka, A.-P. Tsai, A. Inoue, T. Masumoto and Y. Nakamura, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 27(1988)L1125.Google Scholar
  13. [10]
    S. Nasu, M. Miglierini, K.N. Ishihara and P.H. Shingu, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 61(1992)3766.Google Scholar
  14. [11]
    C.L. Chien and M. Lu, Phys. Rev. B45(1992) 12793Google Scholar
  15. [11]a
    M. Lu and C.L. Chien, Hyp. Int. 71(1992)1525.Google Scholar
  16. [12]
    Z.M. Stadnik and G. Stroink, Phys. Rev. B44(1991)4255, and references therein; Hyp. Int. 69(1991)643.Google Scholar
  17. [13]
    Y. Ma and E.A. Stern, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61(1988)901Google Scholar
  18. [13]a
    M. Eibschütz, M.E. Lines, H.S. Chen, J.V. Waszczak, G.P. Espinosa and A.S. Cooper, Phys. Rev. B41(1990)4606.Google Scholar
  19. [14]
    A. Sadoc, Phil. Mag. Lett. 60(1989)21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© J.C. Baltzer AG, Science Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Z. M. Stadnik
    • 1
  • F. Müller
    • 2
  • G. Stroink
    • 3
  • M. Rosenberg
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Institut für Experimentalphysik VIRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations