Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical investigation of colorectal cancer detected by follow-up colonoscopy after endoscopic polypectomy

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: We analyzed the results of a long-term follow-up surveillance of patients with colorectal polyps after endoscopic polypectomy in terms of the cumulative incidence of subsequent colorectal cancer and the clinicopathologic characteristics of carcinomas detected by colonoscopy. METHOD: The study cohort consisted of 6,715 patients who had received endoscopic resection of single or multiple colorectal polyps and then underwent periodic colonoscopy (or a combination of sigmoidoscopy and barium x-ray examination in some cases) during an average follow-up of six years (40,622 person-years in total). RESULTS; During the follow-up, 31 cases of colorectal cancer containing 15 submucosal invasive carcinomas (T1,N0,M0) and 16 advanced carcinomas were detected. The cumulative incidence of colorectal cancer was analyzed for four subgroups of the 6,715 patients classified according to the diameter, grade of dysplasia, and histologic features of polyps. Furthermore, the depth of invasion, macroscopic configuration of submucosal invasive cancer, and site of colorectal cancer observed in the 31 cases were compared with those of a reference group of 1,497 patients with colorectal cancer treated at Takano Hospital during the same period. Submucosal invasive cancer was the most common type among the colorectal carcinomas detected during follow-up. In terms of macroscopic configuration of submucosal cancer, the superficial type was significantly more common than the protruded type. The superficial submucosal cancer showed a significantly longer interval to detection than the protruded submucosal cancer. By site of lesion, proximal colon cancer was significantly more common. CONCLUSION: Follow-up colonoscopy appears to be useful in patients with larger polyps (>5 mm). Patients with severe dysplasia and those with malignant polyps should be followed-up carefully. Because submucosal cancer detected by follow-up examination after polypectomy showed higher rates of superficial-type cancer and proximal colon cancer, careful endoscopic examination of the entire colon is important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hibi T, Iwao Y, Yoshioka M. Preventive medical examinations for colorectal cancer in Japan to reduce mortality from colorectal cancer. Dig Endosc 1997;9:3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sawada T, Watanabe T, Muto T. Risk of metachronous carcinoma and adenoma following colonoscopic polypectomy. Stomach Intestine 1993;28:503–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bond JH. Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment and surveillance for patients with non familial colorectal polyps. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:836–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Konishi F. Follow-up schedule after colonoscopic polypectomy—a proposal by Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Endoscopy. Endoscopia Digestiva 1994;6:1419–22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Okamoto H, Sasaki T. Anatomical distribution and morphological study of colorectal polyps after endoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterol Endosc 1989;31:76–82.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Igarashi M, Katsumata T, Yamamoto Y,et al. Clinical evaluation on follow-up study in patients with adenoma or early cancer follwing endoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterol Endosc 1990;32:2555–61.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Igarashi M, Katsumata T, Naitoh Y,et al. Follow-up study of early colorectal cancer after endoscopic resection. Dig Endosc 1993;5:359–65.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kudo S, Nakashima K, Kusaka N, Nakamura J, Iinuma H, Ono S. Follow-up examination of superficial type colorectal tumors after endoscopic resection. Stomach Intestine 1993;28:533–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1975;36:2251–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morson BC, Dawson IM. Gastrointestinal pathology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1979:615–47.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Welin S, Youker J, Spratt JS,et al. The rates and patterns of growth of 375 tumors of the large intestine and rectum observed serially by double contrast enema study (Malmo technique). AJR Am J Roentgenol 1963;90:673–87.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE, Libble SD, Ilstrup DM, MacCarty. Natural history of untreated colonic polyp. Gastroenterology 1987;96:1009–13.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Murakami R, Tsukuma H, Imanishi K,et al. Natural history of colorectal polyps and the effect of polypectomy on occurrence of subsequent cancer. Int J Cancer 1990;46:159–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gilbertson VA. Proctosigmoidoscopy and polypectomy in reducing the incidence of rectal cancer. Cancer 1974;34:936–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller AB. Review of sigmoidoscopic screening for colorectal cancer. In: Chamberlain J, Miller AB, eds. Screening for gastrointestinal cancer. Toronto: Hans Huber, 1987:3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Morson BC. The evolution of colorectal carcinoma. Clin Radiol 1984;35:425–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spencer RJ, Melton LJ III, Ready RL, Ilstrup DM. Treatment of small colorectal polyps: a population-based study of the subsequent carcinoma. Mayo Clin Proc 1984;59:305–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lotfi AM, Sprencer RJ, Ilstrup DM, Melton LJ III. Colorectal polyps and the risk of subsequent carcinoma. Mayo Clin Proc 1986;61:337–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 1992;326:658–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN,et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1977–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Japanese Research Society for Cancer of Colon and Rectum. General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. 5th ed. Tokyo Kanehara Shuppan, 1994;29–31.

  22. Saito K, Ogawa A, Ohki I. A study of the rate of superficial cancer progressing to advanced cancer of the colon and rectum. Dig Endosc 1996;8:276–80.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Muto T, Kamiya J, Sawada T,et al. Small “flat adenoma” of the large bowel with special reference to its clinicopathologic features. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:847–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kudo S. Endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed types of early colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 1993;25:455–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lynch HT, Smyrk T, Lanspa SJ,et al. Flat adenomas in a colon cancer-prone kindred. J Natl Cancer Inst 1988;80:278–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wolber RA, Owen DA. Flat adenoma of the colon. Hum Pathol 1991;22:70–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Adachi M, Muto T, Okinaga K, Morioka Y. Clinicopathologic features of the flat adenoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:981–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stolte M, Bethke B. Colorectal mini-de novo carcinoma: a reality in Germany, too. Endoscopy 1995;27:286–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Watanabe T, Sawada T, Kubota Y,et al. Malignant potential in flat elevations. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:548–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Nozaki, R., Takagi, K., Takano, M. et al. Clinical investigation of colorectal cancer detected by follow-up colonoscopy after endoscopic polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 40 (Suppl 10), S16–S22 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02062015

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02062015

Key words

Navigation