Abstract
The detection of a chemical alarm pheromone may allow receivers to avoid areas where a predator has captured the prey's conspecifics. We marked minnow traps with either brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans) skin extract or a control of distilled water and tested whether sticklebacks avoided the skin extract marked traps in a natural habitat. Significantly more sticklebacks were captured in traps marked with control water, thereby demonstrating avoidance of conspecific skin extract. The stickleback captured in traps marked with conspecific extract were significantly smaller than those captured in traps marked with control water, implicating ontogenetic factors (i.e., experience or physiological development) in the development of the response. We also captured significantly fewer finescale dace (Chrosomus neogaeus) and fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) in traps marked with skin extract. These data suggest that dace and minnows may benefit by avoiding areas where predators have recently captured sticklebacks.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atema, J., andStenzler, D. 1977. Alarm substance of the marine mud snail,Nassarius obsoletus: Biological characterization and possible evolution.J. Chem. Ecol. 3:173–187.
Fricke, D. 1987. Reaction to alarm substance in cave populations ofAstyanax fasciatus (Characidae, Pisces).Ethology 76:305–308.
Hews, D.K. 1988. Alarm response in larval western toads,Bufo boreas: Release of larval chemical by a natural predator and its effect on predator capture efficiency.Anim. Behav. 36:125–133.
Hews, D.K., andBlaustein, A.R. 1985. An investigation of the alarm response inBufo boreas andRana cascadae tadpoles.Behav. Neural Biol. 43:47–57.
Magurran, A.E. 1989. Acquired recognition of predator odour in the European minnow (Phoxinus phoxinus).Ethology 82:216–223.
Mathis, A., andSmith, R.J.F. 1993. Avoidance of areas marked with a chemical alarm substance by fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) in a natural habitat.Can. J. Zool. 70:1473–1476.
Mathis, A., andSmith, R.J.F. 1994. Intraspecific and cross-superorder responses to chemical alarm signals by brook stickleback.Ecology 74:2395–2404.
Pfeiffer, W. 1963. Alarm substances.Experientia 19:113–168.
Siegel, S., andCastellan, N.J. 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Smith, R.J.F. 1976. Male fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas Rafinesque) retain their fright reaction to alarm substance during the breeding season.Can. J. Zool. 54:2230–2231.
Smith, R.J.F. 1982. The adaptive significance of the alarm substance-fright reaction system, pp. 327–342,in T.J. Hara (ed.). Chemoreception in Fishes. Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam.
Smith, R.J.F. 1992. Alarm signals in fishes.Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2:33–63.
Smith, R.J.F., Lawrence, B.J., andSmith, M.J. 1991. Cross-reactions to skin extract between two gobies,Asterropteryx semipunctatus andBrachygobius sabanus.J. Chem. Ecol. 17:2253–2259.
Snyder, N.F.R., andSnyder, H.A. 1970. Alarm response ofDiadema antillarum.Science 168:276–278.
Stenzler, D., andAtema, J. 1977. Alarm response of the marine mud snail,Nassarius obsoletus: Specifity and behavioral priority.J. Chem. Ecol. 3:159–171.
Von Frisch, K. 1941. Über einen Schreckstoff der Fischhaut und seine biologische Bedeutung.Z. Vergl. Physiol. 29:26–145.
Waldman, B. 1982. Quantitative and developmental analysis of the alarm reaction in the zebra danio,Brachydanio rerio.Copeia 1982:1–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chivers, D.P., Smith, R.J.F. Intra- and interspecific avoidance of areas marked with skin extract from brook sticklebacks (Culaea inconstans) in a natural habitat. J Chem Ecol 20, 1517–1524 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02059877
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02059877