Abstract
This paper aims to answer the following question: are the fluctuations of abundance of Common Vole (Microtus arvalis) specific to different types of landscapes? The research was carried out in landscapes where grassland was dominant. The sampling method was based upon a partition in both landscape types and landscape units. Tracking of vole indices was used to evaluate their relative abundance. Six landscape transects were sampled during two successive years. Results show that population variation and diffusion of demographic states are closely related to landscape types. The possible causes of this are discussed. The landscape units can be used as global variables to assess outbreak risk and landscape design can be used to prevent them.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson, M. and Erlinge, S. 1977. Influence of predation on rodent populations. Oikos 29(3): 591–597.
Apeldoorn, R.C., Oostenbrink, W.T., Van Winden, A. and Zee, F.F. 1992. Effects of habitat fragmentation on the Bank Vole.Clethrionomys glareolus, in an agricultural landscape. Oikos 65: 265–274.
Barry, R.E.J., Heft, A.A. and Baummer, T.E. 1990. Spatial relationships of syntopic White-footed Mice,Peromyscus leucopus. Deer Mice,P. maniculatus, and Red-backed Voles.Clethrionomys gapperi. Canadian Field Naturalist 104(3): 387–393.
Baudry, J. 1989. Interactions between agricultural and ecological systems at the landscape level. Agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment 27: 119–130.
Delattre, P., Giraudoux, P., Damange, J.P. and Quere, J.P. 1990. Recherche d'un indicateur de la cinétique démographique des populations du Campagnol des champs (Microtus arvalis). Revue Ecologie (Terre et Vie) 45: 375–384.
Delattre, P., Giraudoux, P., Baudry, J., Musard, P., Toussaint, M., Truchetet, D., Stahl, P., Poule, M.L., Artois, M., Damange, J.P. and Quere, J.P. 1992. Land use patterns and types of Common Vole (Micmtus arvalis) population kinetics. Agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment 39: 153–169.
Douglass, R.J., Douglass, K.S. and Rossi, L. 1992. Ecological distribution of Bank Voles and Wood Mice in disturbed habitats: preliminary results. Acta Theriologica 37(4): 359–370.
Edwards, W.R. and Clark, W.R. 1988. Ecological dependency: the concept and its implications for research and management. Trans. 53 rd N.A. Wildl. & Nat. Res. Conf. SS2: 115–125.
Erlinge, S., Goransson, G., Hogstedt, G., Liberg, O., Loman, J., Nillson, I., Nillson, T., Von Schantz, T. and Sylven, M. 1983. Predation as a regulating factor on small rodent populations in southern Sweden. Oikos 40(1): 36–52.
Fahrig, L. and Merriam, G. 1985. Habitat patch connectivity and population survival. Ecology 66(6): 1762–1768.
Finerty, J.P. (Ed.) 1980. The population ecology of cycles in small mammals. Yale University Press. New Haven & London. 234 pp.
Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. (Eds.) 1986. Landscape ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 619 pp.
Gaines, M.S., Foster, J., Diffendorfer, J.E., Sera, W.E., Holt, R.D. and Robinson, G.R. 1992. Population processes and biological diversity. Trans. 57th N.A. Wildl. & Nat. Res. Conf. 252–262.
Geuse, P. and Bauchau, V. 1985.Apodemus sylvaticus (Rodentia: Muridae) etClethrionomys glareolus (Rodentia: Microtidae): compétition ou coexistence? Annales de la Société de Zoologie Belge 115(2): 211–220.
Giraudoux, P. 1991. Utilisation de l'espace par les hÔtes du ténia multiloculaire (Echinococcus multilocularis: conséquences épidémiologiques. Thèse de Doctorat. Dijon, 106 pp.
Giraudoux, P., Michelat, D. and Habert, M. 1990. La Chouette effraie (Tyto alba) est-elle un bon modèle d'étude en dynamique de population? Alauda 58(1): 17–20.
Giraudoux, P., Delattre, P., Quere, J.P. and Damange, J.P. 1994. Distribution and kinetics of rodent populations in a region under agricultural land abandonment. Acta Ecologia 15(4): 385–400.
Hanski, I. 1987. Populations of small mammals cycle — Unless they don't. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2(3): 55–57.
Hanski, I., Hansson, L. and Henttonen, H. 1987. Specialist predators, generalist predators, and the microtine rodent cycle. Journal of Animal Ecology 60: 353–367.
HeikkilÄ, J., Below, A. and Hanski, I. 1994. Synchronous dynamics of microtine rodent populations on islands in Lake Inari in northern Fennoscandia: evidence for regulation by mustelid predators. Oikos 70: 245–252.
Henttonen, H., Oksanen, T., Jortikka, H. and Haukisalmi, V. 1987. How much do weasels shape microtine cycles in northern Fennoscandia taiga? Oikos 50: 353–365.
Hansson, L. 1988. The domestic cat as a possible modifier of vole dynamics. Mammalia 52(2): 159–164.
Hansson, L. 1989. Predation in heterogeneous landscapes: how to evaluate total impact? Oikos 54(1): 117–119.
Johnson, A.R., Wiens, J.A., Milne, B.T. and Crist, T.O. 1992. Animal movements and population dynamics in heterogeneous landscape. Landscape Ecology 7(1): 63–75.
Kozakiewicz, M. 1993. Habitat isolation and ecological barriers. The effect on small mammal populations and communities. Acta Theriologica 38(1): 1–30.
Krebs, C.J. and Myers, J.H. 1974. Population cycles in small mammals. Advances in Ecological Research 8: 267–399.
Lidicker, W.Z.J. 1985. Population structuring as a factor in understanding microtine cycles. Acta Zoologica Fennica 173:23–27.
Lidicker, W.Z.J. 1988. Solving the enigma of microtine ‘cycles’. Journal of Mammalogy 69(2): 225–235.
Lidicker, W.Z.J., Wolff, J.O., Lidicker, L.N. and Smith, M.H. 1992. Utilization of a habitat mosaic by cotton rats during a population decline. Landscape Ecology 6(4): 259–268.
Loman, J. 1991. Small mammal and raptor densities in habitat islands: area effect in a south Swedish agricultural landscape. Landscape Ecology 5(3): 183–189.
Merriam, G. 1990. Ecological processes in the time and space of farmland mosaics.In Changing Landscapes: An Ecological Perspective, pp. 121–133. Edited by I.S. Zonneweld and T.T. Forman. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Rose, R.K. and Birney, E.C. 1985. Community ecology.In Biology of New World Microtus. Special Publication Nℴ 8. pp. 310–339. Edited by R.H. Tamarin. The American Society of Mammalogists. Shippensburg. Pennsylvania.
Szacki, J., Babinska-Werka, J. and Liro, A. 1993. The influence of landscape spatial structure on small mammal movements. Acta Theriologica 38(2): 113–123.
Teivainen, T. 1979. Vole damage to forest tree seedlings in reforested areas and fields in Finland in the years 1973–1976. Folia Forestalia 387: 23 pp.
Thioulouse, J. 1989. Statistical analysis and graphical display of multivariate data on the Macintosh. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 5: 287–293.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Delattre, P., Giraudoux, P., Baudry, J. et al. Effect of landscape structure on Common Vole (Microtus arvalis) distribution and abundance at several space scales. Landscape Ecol 11, 279–288 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02059855
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02059855