An analysis of the Aharonov-Anandan-Vaidman model


We argue that the Aharonov-Anandan-Vaidman model, by using the notion of so-called “protective measurements,” cannot claim to have dispensed with the ldcollapse of the wave function,” because it does not succeed in avoiding the quantum measurement problem. Its claim to be able to distinguish between two nonorthogonal states is also critically examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

    Y. Aharonov, J. Anandan, and L. Vaidman,Phys. Rev. A 47, 4616 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    A. J. Leggett, inQuantum Implications, B. J. Hiley and F. D. Peat, eds. (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1986);Contemp. Phys. 25, 583 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman,Phys. Lett. A 178, 38 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    M. Namiki,Physica B 151, 381 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghose, P., Home, D. An analysis of the Aharonov-Anandan-Vaidman model. Found Phys 25, 1105–1109 (1995).

Download citation


  • Wave Function
  • Protective Measurement
  • Quantum Measurement
  • Measurement Problem
  • Nonorthogonal State