Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative studies on receptor structure in the brittlestarOphiura ophiura

  • Published:
Journal of Neurocytology

Summary

The morphology of cells incorporating modified cilia in the epithelium of the spines, tube-feet and general surface of the ophiuroid echinodermOphiura ophiura are described using transmission and scanning electron microscopy and compared to those on the tube-feet of the echinoidEchinus esculentus. Some receptor cells have cilia showing a normal 9 + 2 microtubular arrangement and these project from the cuticular surface. There are also three basic cell types in which the cilia do not show a continuous normal 9 + 2 microtubular arrangement. In one class, a ring of microvilli form a tube which protrudes from the cuticular surface and which contains a cilium. This type is present on both spines and tube-feet and is identical in structure to the Stäbchen receptors described previously. The second type, termed the non-projecting receptor, is not surrounded by specialized microvilli, and the cilium which projects from the receptor cell ends flush with the cuticle which may be 3 or 4 μm above the epithelial surface; these are only present on the tube-feet. The third type of receptor occurs on the general surface of the arm, and from its position and some aspects of its structure may be a general photic receptor. It consists of a highly modified cilium characterized by a very short ciliary root. The cilium projects very little above the receptor cell surface and terminates among the extracellular fibrillar material that packs the gap of variable width between the epithelial cellular surface and the non-cellular cuticle. The distribution of these presumptive receptor cells is discussed in the light of recent sensory physiological findings and previous descriptions by other authors of receptor structures in the whole phylum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker, M. F. (1978) Structure of the organs of attachment of brachiolaria larvae ofStichaster australis (Verrill) andCoscinasterias calamaria (Gray).Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 33, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouland, C., Massin, C. &Jangoux, M. (1982) The fine structure of the buccal tentacles ofHolothuria forskali.Zoomorphology 101, 133–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, P. H. (1975) Bioluminescence: the anatomy and physiology of its nervous control in Ophiopsila californica. PhD Thesis, University of California.

  • Burke, R. D. (1978) The structure of the nervous system of the pluteus larva ofStrongylocentrotus purpuratus.Cell and Tissue Research 191, 233–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. D. (1980) Podial sensory receptors and the induction of metamorphosis in echinoids.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 47, 223–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. D. (1983) The structure of the larval nervous system ofPisaster ochraceus.Journal of Morphology 178, 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, M. &Fontaine, A. R. (1983) Morphology and function of the tubefeet ofFlorometra serratissima.Zoomorphology 102, 175–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. C. (1983) Form and function of pedicellariae. InEchinoderm Studies, Vol. 1 (edited byJangoux, M. &Lawrence, J. M.), pp. 139–67. Rotterdam: Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, J. L. S. (1968) The fine structure of the pedicellariae ofEchinus esculentus. II. The sensory system.Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society 88, 223–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, J. L. S. (1985) The neurobiology of the ectoneural/ hyponeural synaptic Connection in an echinoderm.Biological Bulletin 168, 432–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, J. L. S. &Stubbs, T. (1981) The giant neurone system in ophiuroids. I. The general morphology of the radial nerve cords and circumoral ring.Cell and Tissue Research 219, 197–207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, L. (1985) Ultrastructure of tubefeet of the ophiuroidAmphipholis squamata. InProceedings of 5th International Echinoderms Conference (edited byKeegan, B. F.). Rotterdam: Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, H. F. &Fontaine, A. R. (1975) A decalcification method for ultrastructure of echinoderm tissue.Stain Technology 50, 351–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin, R. M. (1966) Evolution of photoreceptors.Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 30, 363–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fankboner, P. V. (1978) Suspension-feeding mechanisms of the armoured sea cucumberPsolus chitinoides.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 31, 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florey, E. &Cahill, M. A. (1982) Scanning electron microscopy of echinoid podia.Cell and Tissue Research 224, 543–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. R., Bergquist, P. R. &Bullivant, S. (1979) An anastomosing septate junction in endothelial cells of the phylum Echinodermata.Journal of Ultrastructure Research 67, 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, N. D. &Nealson, K. H. (1978) The fine structure of the echinoderm cuticle and the subcuticular bacteria of echinoderms.Acta zoologica 59, 169–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, M. C. (1984) The ciliary basal apparatus is adapted to the structure and mechanics of the epithelium.Tissue and Cell 16, 287–310.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, J. L. (1977) Estructura y ultraestructura del epitelio de los podios deOphiothrix fragilis.Real Sociedad Espanola de Historia Natural 75, 275–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A. &Cobb, J. L. S. (1985a) Neurophysiological studies on photic responses inOphiura ophiura.Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 80A, 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A. &Cobb, J. L. S. (1985b) Neurophysiological studies on the detection of amino acids byOphiura ophiura.Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 82A, 395–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, S. C. (1975) Surface fine structure of the globiferous pedicellariae of the regular echinoid,Psammechinus miliaris.Cell and Tissue Research 162, 377–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penn, P. E. &Alexander, P. E. (1980) Fine structure of the optic cushion in the asteroidNepanthia belcheri.Marine Biology 58, 251–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichensperger, A. (1908) Die Drüsengelbilde der Ophiuren.Zeitschrift Wiss Zoologie 91, 304–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, N. A. &Campbell, A. C. (1982) Chemoreception. InEchinoderm Nutrition (edited byJangoux, M. &Lawrence, J. M.), pp. 1–22. Rotterdam: Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza Santos, H. (1966) The ultrastructure of the mucous granules from starfish tubefeet.Journal of Ultrastructure Research 16, 259–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strathmann, R. R. (1972) The feeding behaviour of planktotrophic echinoderm larvae: mechanisms, regulation and rates of suspension-feeding.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 6, 109–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, T. &Cobb, J. L. S. (1982) A new ciliary feeding structure in an ophiuroid echinoderm.Tissue and Cell 14, 573–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, W. &Grosmann, M. (1977) Ultrastructure of the basiepithelial nerve plexus of the sea urchinCentrostephanus longispinus.Cell and Tissue Research 175, 551–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, P. J. &Emson, R. H. (1983) Presumptive ciliated receptors associated with the fibrillar glands of the spines of the echinodermAmphipholis squamata.Cell and Tissue Research 232, 609–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. L. &Cavey, M. J. (1981) Ultrastructure of the coelomic lining in the podium of the starfishStylasterias forreri.Cell and Tissue Research 218, 449–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cobb, J.L.S., Moore, A. Comparative studies on receptor structure in the brittlestarOphiura ophiura . J Neurocytol 15, 97–108 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02057908

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02057908

Keywords

Navigation