Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of individual surgeon's performance

Risk-adjusted analysis with POSSUM scoring system

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Comparison of outcome after colorectal resection among different surgeons is difficult. Crude rates of morbidity and mortality can be misleading because such rates make no allowance for differences in case mix and fitness of patients. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare outcome among five surgeons by means of the simple, well-validated scoring system POSSUM for risk-adjusted analysis. METHODS: A total of 438 patients were studied prospectively. Each patient underwent colorectal resection by one of the five surgeons. Demographic details, operative procedure, and postoperative course were recorded, and physiologic and operative severity scores were determined. Risk of morbidity and mortality was calculated for each patient. RESULTS: Incidence of morbidity varied sharply among the five surgeons, from 13.6 to 30.6 percent, and the 30-day mortality varied from 4.5 to 6.9 percent. However, application of POSSUM to allow risk-adjusted analysis of the data demonstrated that the incidence of morbidity and mortality predicted by POSSUM based on patients physiologic and operative risks factors was very similar to the observed outcome for each surgeon. CONCLUSION: Direct comparison of individual surgeon's performance based on crude rates of morbidity and mortality can be misleading. Risk-adjusted analysis allows more meaningful comparison.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fletcher D. Hospital “death league” tables provoke outcry. The Daily Telegraph 1994 Dec 17;8.

  2. Berwick DM. The double edge of knowledge. JAMA 1991;266:841–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Copeland GP, Jones D, Wilcox A, Harris PL. Comparative vascular audit using the POSSUM scoring system. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1993;75:175–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Copeland GP. The variability of surgical outcome. Colonews 1994;3:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sagar PM, Hartley MN, Mancey-Jones B, Sedman PC, May J, MacFie J. Comparative audit of colorectal resection with the POSSUM scoring system. Br J Surg 1994;81:1492–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 1991;78:355–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Copeland GP. Comparative audit: factversus fantasy (for debate). Br J Surg 1993;80:1424–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Copeland GP, Sagar PM, Brennan J,et al. Risk-adjusted analysis of surgeon performance: a 1 year study. Br J Surg 1995;82:408–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McArdle CS, Hole D. Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival. Brit Med J 1991;302:1501–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, May 7 to 12, 1995.

About this article

Cite this article

Sagar, P.M., Hartley, M.N., MacFie, J. et al. Comparison of individual surgeon's performance. Dis Colon Rectum 39, 654–658 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02056945

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02056945

Key words

Navigation