Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy
- 73 Downloads
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine whether different regimens using sodium phosphate (NaPh) solutions resulted in better bowel cleansing than polyethylene glycol-salt (PEG) solutions and, if so, why. Side-effects and patient acceptability of the different regimens were also investigated. METHODS: A total of 486 patients requiring colonoscopy were randomly assigned to one of three preparations in a single-blind prospective study. The preparations were as follows: Group A, 3 liters of PEG solution taken at 2 p.m. the day before examination; Group B, 45 ml of NaPh solutions taken at 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. the day before examination; or Group C, 45 ml of NaPh taken at 6 p.m. the day before and at 6 a.m. on the morning of, examination. Cleanliness of the bowel was assessed blindly, and patients were questioned about side-effects and preferences for NaPhvs.PEG. RESULTS: Numbers, ages, and gender distribution of patients in the three groups did not differ significantly from each other. Cleanliness scores for the three groups were 3.34±0.97, 3.22±0.85, and 4.11±0.67 (Group Cvs.Groups A and B,P<0.0005; Group Avs.Group B,P>0.30). Predominance of material in the right side of the colon was found in 13.7, 29.8, and 4.2 percent of Groups A, B, and C, respectively. In the three groups, nausea alone occurred in 3.8, 13.7, and 16.3 percent of patients; vomiting occurred in 0.6, 7.4, and 5.4 percent of patients; and dryness/thirst occurred in 1.9, 17.4, and 20.4 percent of patients, respectively. A total of 80.6 and 82.6 percent of those in Groups B and C who had previously had PEG expressed a preference for taking NaPhP<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The regimen of Group C is significantly better than the regimens of Groups A or B in bowel cleansing. Regimens of Groups A and B did not differ in efficacy of cleansing. It is the timing of taking NaPh in the regimen of Group C rather than its composition that is responsible for its superior cleansing ability compared with PEG. Overnight deposition of small intestinal material in the right colon is partly responsible for the inferior cleansing ability of regimens that involve taking the solution on the day before colonoscopy. Despite a higher incidence of minor side-effects from NaPh than from PEG, a significantly higher proportion of patients preferred NaPh.
Key wordsBowel preparation Sodium phosphate Polyethylene glycol Gut lavage Colonoscopy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Vanner SJ, MacDonald PH, Paterson WG, Prentice RS, Da Costa LR, Beck IT. A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (GoLYTELY) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Am J Gastoenterol 1990;85:422–7.Google Scholar
- 3.Polglase AL. Oral sodium phosphate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Med J Aust 1993;159:491–2.Google Scholar
- 5.Haroon N, Iber FL. Randomized clinical trial comparing oral sodium phosphate (NaP) with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Colyte) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy [abstract]. Gastroenterolology 1992;102:A13.Google Scholar
- 7.Henderson JM, Barnett JL, Elta GH, Nostrant TT, Turgeon DK. Single day oral sodium phosphate laxative preparation for colonoscopy vs intestinal lavage: efficacy and patient tolerance [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 1994;40:47.Google Scholar
- 12.Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH. Applied linear statistical models. 2nd ed. Homewood: Richard Irwin, 1985:582–4.Google Scholar