Abstract
Patients undergoing proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are reported to have an improvement in lifestyle and are able to return to their previous occupation. We questioned whether this was also true of active duty military personnel who require this operation. The rigors of military service are unlike that of most civilian occupations. Soldiers must maintain a physical fitness regimen and remain eligible to deploy overseas. We reviewed our experience with IPAA to determine whether our active duty patients could return to full duty. METHODS: The charts of all patients undergoing IPAA since October 1990 were reviewed, and each patient was interviewed by telephone to elicit late complications not noted in their medical records and to inquire about their present bowel function. Patients were classified as active duty or nonactive duty. Active duty patients were queried as to whether they have remained on active duty, have required a permanent profile, have been promoted, or have been deployed overseas. If a military medical evaluation board had determined whether they were fit for duty, the findings of the board were reviewed. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients underwent an IPAA; 15 were active duty. Mean follow-up was 24 months. Indication for IPAA was ulcerative colitis in 76 percent of patients and familial adenomatous polyposis in 24 percent. J-Pouch was created in 88 percent of patients. Mean bowel movement frequency was seven per day, and 84 percent could defer a bowel movement for more than one hour. Leakage requiring a pad was reported by three patients (9 percent). Seven of 15 active duty patients (47 percent) remained on active duty, and 3 have been promoted. Of the eight patients who were evaluated by a medical evaluation board and were retired, only four were found unfit because of poor bowel function. Therefore, if it were not for other physical limitations, 11 of 15 (73 percent) active duty patients could have continued to serve. CONCLUSIONS: Barring other disqualifying illnesses, active duty soldiers can anticipate continuation of their military career following IPAA. Active duty soldiers, if motivated, can excel and maintain their status in the military.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker JM. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: current status and controversies. Surg 1993;113:599–602.
Beck DE, Gathright JB. Ulcerative colitis: surgical indications and alternatives. South Med J 1994;87:773–9.
Corman ML. Colon and rectal surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1993:472–80.
Sitzmann JV. Familial colorectal polyposis. In: Cameron JL, ed. Current surgical therapy. 4th ed. St. Louis: BC Decker/Mosby, 1992:188–90.
Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM,et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 Patients. Ann Surg 1995;222:120–7.
Nicholls RJ, Moskowitz RL, Shepherd NA. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir. Br J Surg 1985;72(Suppl):S76–9.
Damgaard B, Wettergren A, Kirkegaard P. Social and sexual function following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:286–9.
Kohler LW, Pemberton JH, Zinsmeister AR, Kelly KA. Quality of life after proctocolectomy. Gastroenterology 1991;101:679–84.
Pemberton JH, Phillips SF, Ready RR, Zinsmeister AR, Beahrs OH. Quality of life after Brooke ileostomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1989;209:620–8.
Kohler LW, Pemberton JH, Hodge DO, Zinsmeister AR, Kelly KA. Long-term functional results and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and cholecystectomy. World J Surg 1992;16:1126–32.
Skarsgard ED, Atkinson KG, Bell GA, Pezim ME, Seal AM, Sharp FR. Function and quality of life results after ileal pouch surgery for chronic ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis. Am J Surg 1989;157:467–71.
Fujita S, Kusunoki M, Shoji Y, Owada T, Utsunomiya J. Quality of life after total proctocolectomy and ileal j-pouch anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:1030–9.
McIntyre PB, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, Beart RW, Dozois RR. Comparing functional results one year and ten years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:303–7.
Wexner SD, Jensen L, Rothenberger DA, Wong WD, Goldberg SM. Long-term functional analysis of the ileoanal reservoir. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:275–81.
Pezim ME, Nicholls RJ. Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy with pelvic ileal reservoir. Br J Surg 1985;72:31–3.
Glotzer D, Mowschenson P. Chronic ulcerative colitis. In: Cameron JL, ed. Current surgical therapy. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1995:150–8.
Sandborn WJ. Pouchitis following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: definition, pathogenesis, and treatment. Gastroenterology 1994;107:1856–60.
Atkinson KG, Owen DA, Wankling G. Restorative proctocolectomy and indeterminate colitis. Am J Surg 1994;167:516–8.
Pezim ME, Pemberton JH, Beart RW Jr,et al. Outcome of “indeterminate” colitis following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:653–8.
Koltun WA, Schoetz DJ Jr, Roberts PL, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Indeterminate colitis predisposes to perineal complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:857–60.
Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Welling DR,et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: comparison of results in familial adenomatous polyposis and chronic ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg 1989;210:268–73.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Bamberger, P.K., Otchy, D.P. Ileoanal pouch in the active duty population. Dis Colon Rectum 40, 60–66 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055683
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055683