Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intraoperative reasons for abandoning ileal pouch-anal anastomosis procedures

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the operation of choice for most patients with chronic ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. However, because of technical or disease factors at the time of pouch construction, IPAA must sometimes be abandoned. A retrospective review was conducted to find reasons for IPAA failure or abandonment. METHODS: Since 1981, 103 patients have had to have an IPAA procedure at the George Washington University Medical Center in Washington, DC. All charts were reviewed and data retrospectively collected. RESULTS: Six of 103 patients (six percent) were unable to have IPAA constructed. Five patients ultimately received a standard end ileostomy, and one had an ileorectal anastomosis. The reasons for abandoning the IPAA procedure were an ischemic pouch, failure to reach the anus, poorly controlled presacral hemorrhage, desmoid of the mesentery, and finding incurable colon carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Information regarding the risk of failure or abandonment during the IPAA procedure should be discussed with the patient during preoperative counseling and must be included as an element of informed consent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pemberton JH, Phillips SF, Ready RR, Zinsmeister AR, Beahrs OH. Quality of life after Brooke ileostomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: comparison of performance status. Ann Surg 1989;209:620–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Skarsgard ED, Atkinson KG, Bell GA, Pezim ME, Seal AM, Sharp FR. Function and quality of life results after ileal pouch surgery for chronic ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis. Am J Surg 1989;157:467–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ Jr, Coller JA, Murray JJ, Veidenheimer MC. Long-term results of the ileoanal pouch procedure. Arch Surg 1993;128:500–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grotz RL, Pemberton JH. The ileal pouch operation for ulcerative colitis. Surg Clin North Am 1993;73:909–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith LE. The superior mesenteric artery: the critical factor in the ileal pouch pull-through procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:741–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burnstein MJ, Schoetz DJ Jr, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Technique of mesenteric lengthening in ileal reservoir-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:863–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Penna C, Tiret E, Parc R,et al. Operation and abdominal desmoid tumors in familiar adenomatous polyposis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993;177:263–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hulten L, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Oresland T. Kock's pouch converted to a pelvic pouch: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:467–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Chun, HK., Smith, L.E. & Orkin, B.A. Intraoperative reasons for abandoning ileal pouch-anal anastomosis procedures. Dis Colon Rectum 38, 273–275 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055601

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055601

Key words

Navigation