Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Natural history of minute sessile colonic adenomas based on radiographic findings

Is endoscopic removal of every colonic adenoma necessary?

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: With the development of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema, detection of minute sessile coIonic adenomas has increased. We evaluated progression of these lesions radiologically and attempted to clarify the natural history. METHODS: A total of 125 minute sessile adenomas (≤5 mm in size) with histologic confirmation were examined by double-contrast barium enema at an interval of more than one year. The average follow-up period was 24 (range, 12–36; standard deviation, 9–4) months. To allow for differences in magnification, adenomas increasing in size by 2 mm or more were defined as growing, and the other lesions were defined as unchanged. RESULTS: Eighty-six adenomas showed no interval change in size. Four adenomas decreased 1 mm in size, and 27 adenomas increased 1 mm in size. The remaining eight adenomas (6 percent) increased by 2 or 3 mm in size. None of the adenomas showed any morphologic changes. There was also no difference in degree of histologic atypia between growing and unchanged adenomas. None of the adenomas developed into carcinomas during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that most minute sessile adenomas remain unchanged in size and morphology over the long term. Accordingly, these adenomas probably should be followed up radiologically or endoscopically to avoid excessive polypectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Church JM, Fazio VW, Jones IT. Small colorectal polyps: are they worth treating? Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:50–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ryan ME, Norfleet RG, Kirchner JP,et al. The significance of diminutive colonic polyps found at flexible sigmoidscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1989;35:85–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Morson BC, Dawson IM. Gastrointestinal pathology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Figiel LS, Figiel SJ, Wietersen FK. Is surgical removal of every colonic polyp necessary? AJR 1962;88:721–32.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rickert RR, Auerbach D, Garfinkel L, Hammond EC, Frasca JM. Adenomatous lesions of the large bowel: an autopsy survey. Cancer 1979;43:1847–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eide TJ, Stalsberg H. Polyps of the large intestine in Northern Norway. Cancer 1978;42:2839–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitsushima T, Arima N, Nagatani K,et al. Distribution of neoplastic polyps in Japanese adults: estimation based on five years experience of colonoscopic mass screening. I to Cho 1989;24:147–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by the Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research (3022) from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan.

About this article

Cite this article

Ueyama, T., Kawamoto, K., Iwashita, I. et al. Natural history of minute sessile colonic adenomas based on radiographic findings. Dis Colon Rectum 38, 268–272 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055600

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055600

Key words

Navigation