Abstract
PURPOSE: It is commonly believed that the right lobe of the liver is the most frequent site of colorectal liver metastases. However, direct evidence for this is lacking in the literature. This study was designed to document and evaluate the pattern of liver metastases according to liver segments. METHODS: A retrospective medical records review of 270 patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal adenocarcinoma was performed to determine the pattern of metastases according to Couinaud's segments. There was operative confirmation of liver metastases in 202 patients (75 percent). A total of 1,166 segments were involved with liver metastases and were used in this analysis. Segment I was excluded from calculations because of its dual blood supply. When groups contained different numbers of Couinaud's segments an appropriate correction was made in the statistical comparison. RESULTS: There were 736 (63 percent) right lobe segments (V,VI, VE, VIE) and 430 (37 percent) left lobe segments (II, III, IV) involved with metastases (P <0.001). Of 430 left lobe segments, 298 (69 percent) involved the left lateral segment (II, III) and 132 (31 percent) involved the medial segment (TV) of the left lobe (P =0.25). When evaluating patients with 4 or less segments involved, there were 258 right lobe segments (75 percent) and 88 left lobe segments (25 percent) involved with metastases (P <0.0001). Of 88 left lobe segments with 4 or less segments involved, there were 68 segments (77 percent) involving the left lateral segment and 20 segments (23 percent) involving the medial segment of the left lobe (P =0.035). All of these relationships were statistically independent of the primary tumor site. CONCLUSIONS: We have documented an overall predominance of right hepatic lobe metastases independent of site of the primary colorectal carcinoma. However, when metastases occurred in the left lobe, the left lateral segment (II, III) was more commonly affected than the medial segment (TV), but this difference was statistically significant only when there were four or less segments involved with liver metastases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T, Montgomery S. Cancer statistics, 1994. CA Cancer J Clin 1994;44:7–26.
Couinaud C. Le foie: etudes anatomiques et chirugicales. Paris: Masson and Cie, 1957:3–9.
Bismuth H. Surgical anatomy and anatomical surgery of the liver. World J Surg 1982;6:3–9.
Greenway CV, Stark RD. Hepatic vascular bed. Physiol Rev 1971;51:23–65.
Griffen WO, Levitt DG, Ellis CJ, Lifson N. Intrahepatic distribution of hepatic blood flow: single input studies. Am J Physiol 1970;218:1474–9.
Lifson N, Levitt DG, Griffen WO, Ellis CJ. Intrahepatic distribution of hepatic blood flow: double input studies. Am J Physiol 1970;218:1480–8.
Blei AT, O'Reilly DJ, Gottstein J,et al. Distribution of portal blood flow in the liver of rat: a microsphere study. J Lab Clin Med 1984;104:404–13.
Lautt WW, Schafer J, LeGare DJ. Hepatic blood flow distribution: consideration of gravity, liver surface and norepinephrine on regional heterogeneity. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1993;71:128–35.
Daneshmend TK, Jackson L, Roberts CJ. Physiological and pharma-cological variability in estimated hepatic blood flow in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1981;11:491–6.
Svensson CK, Edwards DJ, Mauriello PM,et al. Effects of food on hepatic blood flow: implications in the food effect phenomenon. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1983;34:316–23.
Lemmer B, Nold G. Circadian changes in estimated hepatic blood flow in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1991;32:627–9.
Stone MD, Kane R, Bothe A,et al. Intraoperative ultrasound imaging of the liver at the time of colorectal cancer resection. Arch Surg 1994;129:431–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Orlando, Florida, May 8 to 13, 1994.
About this article
Cite this article
Holbrook, R.F., Rodriguez-Bigas, M.A., Ramakrishnan, K. et al. Patterns of colorectal liver metastases according to Couinaud's segments. Dis Colon Rectum 38, 245–248 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055595
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055595