Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anal manometry with microtransducer technique before and after restorative proctocolectomy

Sphincter function and clinical correlations

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Anal manometry, with microtransducer technique, was performed in 55 patients after restorative proctocolectomy. Forty-two patients were followed regularly from before surgery until 12 months after surgery, and 23 patients until 24 months of function. Postoperatively, sphincter function was severely impaired. At 12 months, the mean height was less than 60 percent, mean area less than 50 percent, and mean length less than 90 percent of the preoperative values of the high pressure zone. There was no improvement between 12 and 24 months. Mean maximal squeeze pressure was restored at 12 months. Rectoanal inhibitory reflex was constantly present preoperatively, but in only 4 of 30 patients, postoperatively. Those patients with preoperative resting pressure 100 cm H 2 O or greater had significantly higher resting tones at 12 months than those with less than 100 cm H 2 O. Patients with 5 or fewer bowel movements every 24 hours had significantly higher resting tones than those with more than 6 movements every 24 hours (66 vs. 45 cm H 2 O). Patients with deferral 60 minutes or greater had significantly higher resting pressures than those with deferral less than 30 minutes (65 vs. 44 cm H 2 O). No correlation was found between resting pressure and state of continence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J 1978;2:85–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liljeqvist L, Lindquist K. A reconstructive operation on malfunctioning S-shaped pelvic reservoirs. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:506–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schouten WR, van Vroonhoven TJ. A simple method of anorectal manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:721–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liljeqvist L, Lindquist K, Ljungdahl I. Alterations in ileoanal pouch technique, 1980 to 1987: complications and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:929–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Varma JS, Smith AN. Anorectal profilometry with the microtransducer. Br J Surg 1984;71:867–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller R, Bartolo DC, Roe AM, Mortensen NJ McC. Assessment of microtransducers in anorectal manometry. Br J Surg 1988;75:40–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Duthie HL, Watts JM. Contribution of the external anal sphincter to the pressure zone in the anal canal. Gut 1965;6:64–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gibbons CP, Bannister JJ, Trowbridge EA, Read NW. An analysis of anal sphincter pressure and anal compliance in normal subjects. Int J Colorect Dis 1986;1:231–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nasmyth DG, Johnston D, Godwin PG, Dixon MF, Smith A, Williams NS. Factors influencing bowel function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1986;73:469–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharp FR, Bell GA, Seal AM, Atkinson KG. Investigations of the anal sphincter before and after restorative proctocolectomy. Am J Surg 1987;153:469–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Keighley MR, Yoshioka K, Kmiot W, Heyen F. Physiological parameters influencing function in restorative proctocolectomy and ileo-pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1988;75:997–1002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Becker JM. Anal sphincter function after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy and endorectal ileoanal pull-through. Arch Surg 1984;119:526–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pescatori M, Parks AG. The sphincteric and sensory components of preserved continence after ileoanal reservoir. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1984;158:517–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. O'Connell PR, Stryker SJ, Metcalf AM, Pemberton JH, Kelly KA. Anal canal pressure and motility after ileoanal anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1988;166:47–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lubowski DZ, Nicholls RJ, Swash M, Jordan MJ. Neural control of internal anal sphincter function. Br J Surg 1987;74:668–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lane RH, Parks AG. Function of the anal sphincters following colo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1977;64:596–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hancock BD, Smith K. The internal sphincter and Lord's procedure for haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1975;62:833–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hiltunen K-M, Matikainen M. Anal manometric evaluation in anal fissure: effect of anal dilatation and lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy. Acta Chir Scand 1986;152:65–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Keighley MR. Abdominal mucosectomy reduces the incidence of soiling and sphincter damage after restorative proctocolectomy and J-pouch. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:386–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Heppell J, Taylor BM, Beart RW, Dozois RR, Kelly KA. Predicting outcome after endorectal ileoanal anastomosis. Can J Surg 1983;26:132–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nicholls RJ, Belliveau P, Neill M, Wilks M, Tabaqchali S. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir: a pathophysiological assessment. Gut 1981;22:462–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Neal DE, Williams NS, Johnston D. Rectal, bladder and sexual function after mucosal proctectomy with and without a pelvic reservoir for colitis and polyposis. Br J Surg 1982;69:599–604.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. O'Connell PR, Pemberton JH, Brown ML, Kelly KA. Determinants of stool frequency after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Am J Surg 1987;153:157–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reference

  1. Johnston D, Holdsworth PJ, Nasmyth DG, et al. Preservation of the entire anal canal in conservative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a pilot study comparing end-to-end ileo-anal anastomosis without mucosal resection with mucosal proctectomy and endo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1987;74:940–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by The Swedish Cancer Society (Project numbers 2240-B86-01X and 2240-B87-02X).

About this article

Cite this article

Lindquist, K. Anal manometry with microtransducer technique before and after restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 33, 91–98 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055534

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055534

Key words

Navigation