Advertisement

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 40, Issue 10, pp 1228–1232 | Cite as

Long-term results of suture rectopexy in patients with fecal incontinence associated with incomplete rectal prolapse

  • J. W. Briel
  • W. R. Schouten
  • M. O. Boerma
Original Contributions

Abstract

Suture rectopexy is the recommended therapy for complete rectal prolapse that is associated with fecal incontinence. It has been suggested that correction of an incomplete rectal prolapse is also worthwhile for patients with fecal incontinence. PURPOSE: Aims of this study were 1) to evaluate the clinical outcome of suture rectopexy in a consecutive series of patients with incomplete rectal prolapse associated with fecal incontinence, and 2) to compare these results with those obtained from patients with complete rectal prolapse. METHODS: Between 1979 and 1994, suture rectopexy was performed in 13 incontinent patients (3 males; median age, 65 (range, 45–77) years) with incomplete rectal prolapse (Group I) and in 24 incontinent patients (21 females; median age, 71 (range, 24–86) years) with complete rectal prolapse (Group II). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 67 months, continence was restored in 5 of 13 (38 percent) patients with incomplete rectal prolapse and in 16 of 24 (67 percent) patients with complete rectal prolapse. In both groups, all male patients became continent. CONCLUSIONS: For the majority of incontinent patients with incomplete rectal prolapse, a suture rectopexy is not beneficial. The clinical outcome of this procedure is only good in incontinent patients with complete rectal prolapse. Based on these data, it is questionable whether incomplete rectal prolapse plays a causative role in fecal incontinence.

Key words

(In)complete rectal prolapse Fecal incontinence Rectopexy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Parks AG. Anorectal incontinence. Proc R Soc Med 1975;68:681–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Watts JD, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Treatment of rectal prolapse. In: Henry MM, Swash M, eds. Coloproctology and the pelvic floor. London: Butterworths Publishing, 1985:308–39.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Allingham W. Fistula, haemorrhoids, painful ulcer, stricture, prolapses and other diseases of the rectum, their diagnosis and treatment. 2nd ed. London: J&A Churchill, 1873.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ripstein CB. Symposium. Procidentia of the rectum: internal intussusception of the rectum (stage I rectal prolapse). Dis Colon Rectum 1975; 18:458–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoffman MJ, Kodner IJ, Fry RD. Internal intussusception of the rectum: diagnosis and surgical management. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:435–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuijpers HC, Schreve RH, ten Cate Hoedemakers H. Diagnosis of functional disorders of defecation causing the solitary ulcer syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:126–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Broden B, Snellman B. Procidentia of the rectum studied with cineradiography: a contribution to the discussion of causative mechanism. Dis Colon Rectum 1968;11:330–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ihre T, Seligson U. Intussusception of the rectum-internal procidentia: treatment and results in 90 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1975;18:391–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Delemarre JB, Kruyt RH. Aspects of anorectal physiology [thesis]. Leiden: Karstens Drukkers BV, 1993:63–73.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schultz I, Mellgren A, Dolk A, Johansson C, Holmström B. Continence is improved after the Ripstein rectopexy: different mechanisms in rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception? Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:300–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parks AG. Anorectal incontinence. J R Soc Med 1975;68:681–90.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mann CV. Rectal prolapse. In: Morson BC, ed. Diseases of the colon, rectum and anus. Apleton-Century-Crofts. 1969:238–50.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ripstein CB. Symposium. Procidentia: definitive corrective surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1972;15:334–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Launer DP, Fazio VW, Weakley FL, Turnbull RB Jr, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC. The Ripstein procedure: a 16 year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:41–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parks AG, Swash M, Urich H. Sphincter denervation in anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Gut 1977; 18:656–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Butler EC. Complete rectal prolapse following removal of tumours of the cauda equine: two cases. J R Soc Med 1954;47:521–2.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Neill ME, Parks AG, Swash M. Physiological studies of the anal sphincter musculature in faecal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1981;68:531–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holmström B, Brodén G, Dolk A, Frenckner B. Increased anal resting pressure following the Ripstein operation: a contribution to continence? Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:485–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Snooks SJ, Henry MM, Swash M. Anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse: differential assessment of the innervation to puborectalis and external anal sphincter muscles. Gut 1985;26:470–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Farouk R, Duthie GS, MacGregor AB, Bartolo DC. Rectoanal inhibition and incontinence in patients with rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994;81:743–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Farouk R, Duthie GS, Bartolo DC, MacGregor AB. Restoration of continence following rectopexy for rectal prolapse is associated with recovery of the internal anal sphincter electromyogram. Br J Surg 1992;79:439–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Duthie GS, Bartolo DC. Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparison of techniques. Br J Surg 1992;79:107–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Duthie GS, Bartolo DC. A comparison between Marlex and resection rectopexy. Neth J Surg 1989;41:136–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yoshioka K, Hyland G, Keighley MR. Anorectal function after abdominal rectopexy: parameters of predictive value in identifying return of continence. Br J Surg 1989;76:64–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spencer RJ. Manometric studies in rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:523–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sainio AP, Voutilainen PE, Husa AI. Recovery of anal sphincter function following transabdominal repair of rectal prolapse: cause of improved continence? Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:816–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brodén G, Dolk A, Holmström B. Recovery of the internal anal sphincter following rectopexy: a possible explanation for continence improvement. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;3:23–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ihre T. Internal procidentia of the rectum: treatment and results. Scand J Gastroenterol 1972;7:643–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Goldberg SM, Gordon PH, Nivatvongs S. Essentials of anorectal surgery. 1st ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1980.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Goei R, van Engelshoven J, Schouten H, Baeten C, Stassen C. Anorectal function: defecographic measurement in asymptomatic subjects. Radiology 1989;173:137–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 1989;30:1737–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wiersma TG. Dynamic rectal examination: clinicoradiological correlation [thesis]. Utrecht: Drukkerij 1994:104–9.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bartram CI, Turnbull GK, Lennard-Jones JE. Evacuation proctography: an investigation of rectal expulsion in 20 subjects without defecatory disturbances. Gastrointest Radiol 1988;13:72–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P. Defecography. II. Contribution to the diagnosis of defecation disorders. Gastrointest Radiol 1984;9:253–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Freimanis MG, Wald A, Caruana B, Bauman DH. Evacuation proctogrpahy in normal volunteers. Invest Radiol 1991;26:581–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Goei R, Baeten C. Rectal intussusception and rectal prolapse: detection and postoperative evaluation with defecography. Radiology 1990;174:124–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Selvaggi F, Canonico S, Riegler G,et al. Surgical treatment of internal rectal prolapse. Coloproctology 1994;16:341–5.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Christiansen J, Hesselfeldt P, Sorensen M. Treatment of internal rectal intussusception in patients with chronic constipation. Scand J Gastroenterol 1995;30:470–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1905–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Burnett SJ, Speakman CT, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Confirmation of endosonographic detection of external anal sphincter defects by simultaneous electromyographic mapping. Br J Surg 1991;78:448–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. W. Briel
    • 1
  • W. R. Schouten
    • 1
  • M. O. Boerma
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryUniversity Hospital DijkzigtRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations